Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process

Description:

... have their feedback conference in the fall when data is available for ... A and B within the first 90 days and a second Part A during the second semester. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: crot8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process


1
Leon County SchoolsPerformance Feedback Process
  • August 2006
  • For more information
  • www.leon.k12.fl.us/Public/Person/

2
Three Key Elements
  • The professional educator is engaged in a process
    of continuous improvement.
  • A constant focus is on improvement of student
    performance.
  • The shift is from minimum competencies to highly
    effective instructional practices.

3
The Critical Element
  • The individual classroom is the focus of
    influence.
  • Performance feedback should result in a positive
    impact upon classroom instruction and increased
    learning of all children.

4
All Teachers
  • The LCS Teacher Performance Feedback Summary Form
    will be used with all teachers.
  • All teachers will have developed and implemented
    an approved Individualized Professional
    Development Plan (IPDP).

5
Documentation
  • All participants in the Professional Education
    Competence (PEC) Program must also complete all
    requirements of the program portfolio.
  • Teachers with an Improvement Notice must document
    the identified target areas.

6
Documentation
  • Teachers rated Professional do not have to
    provide any additional documentation beyond their
    completed IPDP.

7
Annual Salary Increase
  • In order to qualify for a salary increase,
    instructional staff are required to show
    improvement in the performance of their students,
    demonstrate effective teaching practices and
    receive a satisfactory (Professional or
    Accomplished) performance evaluation.

8
Performance Pay Plan
  • Teachers will be given the specific requirements
    for the LCS Performance Pay Plan with the option
    to declare their interest in participating in the
    program at a later time.
  • When available and appropriate, standardized or
    criteria-based national and/or state assessment
    results must be utilized.

9
Peer Feedback
  • Documentation from peer observations, review or
    feedback may be used as part of the assessment
    process only with the teachers approval and at
    the discretion of the administrator.

10
Evaluation Cycles
  • Annual contract teachers, who are not being
    renominated, should have a formal performance
    feedback conference prior to the end of the
    school year.
  • All renominated and continuing or professional
    services contract teachers may have their
    feedback conference in the fall when data is
    available for their IPDP.

11
Observation Timelines
  • Experienced teachers do not require formal
    observations when site administrators are
    conducting regular Classroom Walk-Throughs.
  • Classroom Walk-Throughs CANNOT be used to
    document Needs Improvement.

12
Observation Timelines
  • Experienced teachers, new to the district, should
    have Teacher Assessment Part A and B within the
    first 90 days and a second Part A during the
    second semester.
  • Beginning teachers, new to the district, should
    have Teacher Assessment Part A within the first
    45 days, Part A and B within the first 90 days,
    and the PEC portfolio completed before
    renomination.

13
Observation Timelines
  • Teachers needing assistance will be observed with
    Teacher Assessment Part A and Part B as needed or
    on an ongoing basis. Other elements in an
    improvement plan or improvement notice will be
    addressed within specified timelines.

14
Notification
  • The site administrator will inform his/her staff
    about the evaluation process. The staff will be
    told when formal and informal observations will
    be conducted and by whom.
  • Formal observation for assessment purposes
    requires prior notification to the teacher.
  • Informal observations may be conducted at any
    time.

15
Conferences
  • A conference must be held and documented after
    each formal observation and after any informal
    observation where a serious concern was
    identified.
  • An annual performance feedback conference must be
    held to review the IPDP and the Teacher
    Performance Feedback Summary Form

16
Contract Renewal
  • A satisfactory evaluation (Professional or
    Accomplished overall rating) is necessary but
    not sufficient for annual contract renewal.
  • Fiscal, programmatic and other employee
    performance factors may affect contract renewal.

17
Teacher Performance Feedback Summary Form
  • Completion of IPDP
  • Implementation of Appropriate Curriculum
  • Demonstration of Effective Instructional
    Strategies
  • Utilization of Technology for Instruction
  • Monitoring Student Progress
  • Meeting the Responsibilities of a Teacher

18
Teacher Performance Feedback Summary Form
  • Beyond the IPDP no documentation is required for
    a Professional rating.
  • Teacher must provide documentation to receive an
    Accomplished rating.
  • Administrator must document Needs Improvement.

19
Overall Professional
  • Completed IPDP
  • No other documentation by teacher or
    administrator needed if Classroom Walk-Throughs
    were conducted

20
Overall Accomplished
  • IPDP shows significant growth in student
    achievement.
  • Teacher provides evidence of outstanding
    performance in at least one other area.
  • No area is marked Needs Improvement.

21
Overall Needs Improvement
  • At least two areas have been documented by the
    administrator and marked Needs Improvement.
  • OR
  • The misconduct or ineffective practice has been
    documented to be of a significantly serious
    nature.

22
Overall Unsatisfactory
  • Failure, over time, to improve the serious
    problems identified using the Needs Improvement
    Process
  • A documented serious incident or policy violation
    has occurred.
  • Improvement notices or other documentation must
    be attached.

23
IPDP
  • Student learning outcomes
  • Related professional competencies
  • Related professional development activities
  • Faculty/peer study group
  • School improvement involvement
  • Parent/guardian communication

24
IPDP Student Outcomes
  • One outcome related to the school improvement
    plan focus or targets
  • One outcome based upon an analysis of the needs
    students in your classroom

25
IPDP Professional Competencies
  • One curriculum knowledge, instructional strategy
    or skill, or other professional competency that
    you wish to develop that will help improve
    student performance FOR EACH of the targeted
    outcomes

26
IPDP Professional Development
  • One professional development activity (FOR EACH
    of the identified knowledge, skills or
    competencies) that will help you learn and apply
    the competency in your classroom in order to
    improve the targeted student outcomes

27
IPDP Faculty Study Group
  • Every teacher will participate in a faculty wide,
    department, team or other peer study group in
    order to examine and improve instructional
    practices.
  • The study group may focus on lesson study,
    research based practices, or theory into practice
    using texts or other resources.

28
IPDP SIP Process
  • All teachers are expected to participate in the
    development, implementation and/or monitoring of
    the schools improvement plan.
  • Teachers may serve on SAC, SIP committees or
    subcommittees or otherwise assist in helping the
    school successfully reach SIP goals and
    objectives.

29
IPDP Parent Communication
  • Using surveys, interviews or other formal
    strategies, all teachers will solicit input from
    parents/guardians regarding the effectiveness of
    their communication of expectations, activities
    and student progress
  • Grade level, special area and department teams
    are encouraged to coordinate the solicitation of
    feedback from parents and guardians.

30
IPDP Follow-up
  • The primary question to be answered is What have
    you learned that will help you be better able to
    help your students improve their performance?
  • Use the IPDP Process rubric to assess follow-up.

31
Teacher Assessment Part A
  • Part A is used as an observation instrument to
    provide feedback on specific effective teaching
    practices that help students be successful.
  • Part A may be requested by a teacher wishing
    feedback used by an administrator to help
    document competencies for the PEC program or be
    part of the documentation for Needs Improvement
    on the Teacher Performance Feedback Summary Form.

32
Teacher Assessment Part B
  • Part B is used as a portfolio guide to provide
    feedback on specific effective teaching practices
    that help a teacher be more successful with
    his/her students.
  • Part B may be requested by a teacher wishing
    feedback used by an administrator to help
    document competencies for the PEC program or be
    part of the documentation for Needs Improvement
    on the Teacher Performance Feedback Summary Form.

33
Teacher Assessment Improvement Notice
  • The Improvement Notice is a vehicle to get a
    teachers attention that improvement is not just
    suggested but required.
  • Several opportunities for improvement, with
    support and assistance from the site
    administrator, will be provided.
  • Failure to improve is sufficient grounds for an
    unsatisfactory evaluation.

34
Summary
  • This process assumes the competence of the
    majority of teachers and focuses on professional
    development in the context of improving student
    performance as its priority.
  • The documentation of problematic or ineffective
    behavior is secondary should occur with no
    surprises to the teacher and should include
    opportunities for improvement.

35
Summary
  • The most important part of this whole process is
    the conversation between a teacher and an
    administrator about ways to improve student
    learning.
  • Both teachers and administrators must look for
    ways to initiate those conversations both within
    and outside of this process.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com