Differentiated Instruction: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Differentiated Instruction:

Description:

Collaborative planning processes enable teachers to craft meaningful assessment tasks that will ... very welcoming and keen to share their ideas and opinions. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: Informatio254
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Differentiated Instruction:


1
Differentiated Instruction
  • Knowing our students to teach our students

2
Differentiated Instruction
  • Knowing our students to teach our students

3
School Effectiveness Framework Debrief
  • WSI example
  • Literacy Numeracy score improvements due to a
    deeper, data driven and focused approach.
  • The SEF is an assessment instrument
  • indicates where we are as a school in a given
    moment in time.
  • Dec. 5th Leadership Team retreat.
  • Facilitator Diane Hawkins - group of 20 formal
    informal school leaders
  • able to identify 4 key areas of the learning
    process
  • at the school / classroom / and student levels

4
School Effectiveness Indicators
  • 1. Student Learning and Achievement (SEF
    Indicator)
  • Instruction takes into account the background and
    experiences of all students and meets their
    diverse interests, aptitudes and special needs
  • At the School (Evidence)
  • Professional learning communities focus on
    meeting the diverse needs of students
  • In the classroom (Evidence)
  • Tasks are chosen which have range of entry points
    so that sudents who have different experiences
    and achievement levels can acce3ss the intended
    learning
  • Students are able to (Evidence)
  • apply their learning in a variety of new contexts
    in response to instruction and additional
    interventions

5
School Effectiveness Indicators
  • 2. Instructional Leadership
  • Job-embedded and inquiry-based professional
    learning is made available to staff, building
    capacity and informing practice at the school and
    classroom level.
  • At the school
  • Common planning time is scheduled where feasible.
  • In the classroom
  • Knowledge and effective instructional practices
    are shared (e.g. through co-teaching, mentoring
    and coaching)
  • Students are able to
  • Apply knowledge, skills and strategies across
    content areas (e.g. interpreting charts, graphs
    and non-continuous text)

6
School Effectiveness Indicators
  • 3. Assessment Evaluation
  • Common assessment tasks are collaboratively
    crafted and the resulting student work is
    analyzed to ensure consistency of standards
    within and across grade levels, with the goal of
    equity of outcomes for all students.
  • At the school
  • Collaborative planning processes enable teachers
    to craft meaningful assessment tasks that will
  • activate students knowledge and experiences
  • build consistency and align understanding of
    performance levels across grades and divisions
    (e.g. teacher moderation)
  • In the classroom
  • Learning goals and criteria for success are
    transparent for students and parents (e.g.
    criteria charts, anchor charts, exemplars,
    rubrics)
  • Students are able to
  • Articulate the learning goals of the task and the
    criteria that will be used to assess their work

7
School Effectiveness Indicators
  • 4. Curriculum and Instructional Strategies
  • There are comparable learning experiences, a
    range of differentiated approaches to instruction
    and required interventions within grades, and a
    continuum of knowledge, skills and learning
    across grades
  • At the school
  • Collaborative approaches to planning and
    instructional practice are facilitated across all
    grades levels to ensure a continuum of learning
    from Grade 9 to Grade 12
  • In the classroom
  • Differentiated instruction is designed and
    delivered in a manner that supports student
    achievement in an inclusive classroom setting
  • Students are able to
  • Enthusiastically and confidently engage in the
    learning process (e.g. use accountable talk, are
    on task, questioning, curious, have ownership for
    their learning/classroom, show pride in their
    work)

8
The Three Step Process
School Leadership Team Collaboratively
identifies key areas for focus How will this data
inform my practice?
Feedback
Feedback
First School Visit What are the consistent
patterns across classes? What can students
demonstrate? How will we share this with
teachers? How do we allocate resources
effectively?
Second School Visit What are the consistent
patterns across classes? What can students
demonstrate? Have we moved forward in our
capacity building focus?
9
SEF VISIT FEEDBACK
This District Support visit provided the SEF team
and school administration with an opportunity to
scan a sampling of the school in a short period
of time. We were able to classrooms at all grade
levels and with all pathway designations
represented. School staff was welcoming and
provided some insights into the classroom
routines. Students were also very welcoming and
keen to share their ideas and opinions. Thank
you to the school administration for providing
the team with a schedule that allowed for easy
access to classrooms and an opportunity to
debrief throughout the day.
10
Evident
  • Students are given multiple opportunities to
    practice, apply the new learning
  • Students are able to articulate the classroom
    norms and expectations and learning goals

11
Focus for Professional Learning
  • Although some of the aspects of the
    teaching/learning process listed below, were seen
    in some classrooms, a focus for learning in order
    to build greater consistency of practice across
    all grades and courses is recommended in these
    areas
  • Differentiated instruction is designed and
    delivered in a manner that supports student
    achievement
  • Tasks are chosen which have a range of entry
    points so that students who have different
    experiences and achievement levels can access the
    intended learning
  • Learning goals and criteria for success are
    transparent for students and support student
    learning (criteria charts, anchor charts,
    rubrics)
  • Students are able to enthusiastically and
    confidently engage in the learning process (e.g.
    use accountable talk, questioning, inquiry)

12
Questions to Consider
  • How is student engagement measured?
  • How is student understanding and accountability
    monitored in the classroom?
  • How is instruction being differentiated based on
    assessment data and the needs of students?
  • How are students involved in formative assessment
    and teacher descriptive used to support student
    learning?

13
Questions to Consider
  • What can we reasonably plan for improving student
    achievement by June 2009?
  • What will be our professional learning needs /
    capacity building focus?
  • Follow Up Visit May 20, 2009

14
Next Steps
15
Why We Must Constantly Improve
  • Dallas ISD Video Clip
  • clip

16
Our Differentiated LearnersUnrepresentative
Survey of VSS Students from grades 9-12
  • Taken on May 28, 2008
  • Janet Atkinson

17
Who was surveyed?
  • 140 students
  • All grades
  • Applied/college and university/academic
  • grade 12 respondents are all from the college
    stream

18
What were they asked?
  • They were to self determine their
  • 1. best course--the one they feel excited
    being a part of and attending each day
  • 2. most challenging coursethe one that gave
    them the least joy

19
I have a level 4 in my course
  • Boys have level four in their best subjects, but
    not in their most challenging
  • Fewer boys attain level four in their best
    subject as they progress through grades
  • note that grade 12 is the only grade with no
    academic students surveyed
  • students have better marks in their best course
    than in their most challenging
  • are the marks the criteria students use to
    determine their best most challenging
    courses? Or does their interest encourage them
    to engage therefore earn higher marks? What
    else counts for them?

20
I frequently ask questions and contribute to
discussions in the classroom
  • As they move through school, boys ask fewer
    questions and contribute less to discussions
  • In most cases, the number of questions and
    contribution to discussion is higher in courses
    where students feel best
  • Are there opportunities for discussion in the
    more challenging classes? Is the teaching format
    conducive to student input?
  • What other ways do we have to enable students to
    ask questions contribute in class besides
    discussions?

21
I frequently use technology in the classroom
  • Students were asked about the use of moodle,
    SmartBoards, computers, etc. in their best and
    most challenging classes
  • In all cases, students used more technology in
    the classroom in their best class than in their
    most challenging class
  • 42 of boys identify technology as part of their
    best course and as only 11-31 of their most
    challenging
  • What causes the correlation between technology
    use and best mark? Innovative teaching? Hands
    on, authentic assessments?

22
I frequently receive prompt teacher feedback
  • Both genders report getting prompt feedback,
    either orally or in writing, more frequently in
    their best course than in their most challenging.
  • What constitutes prompt feedback? Are we
    (teachers) as conscientious about returning
    assignments promptly as we are about collecting
    them on time? What other ways can we provide
    feedback?

23
I frequently feel my teacher cares about students
  • Overall, students were more likely to feel that
    the teacher cared in the best course than their
    worst
  • what does caring look like, sound like, feel
    like for boys and for girls? How can we find out?

24
I frequently complete homework and assignments on
time
  • In all cases, students completed more homework
    and assignments on time in their best class than
    their most challenging
  • Are they not completing work in their most
    challenging course because they dont understand
    and/or lost hope/confidence or does their
    understanding lessen because they havent worked?

25
I have 0-3 absences
  • There is remarkable stability in regular
    attendance between best and most challenging
    courses, with students who have good attendance.
  • Females have better attendance than males

26
I have 10 absences
  • Boys are more likely to miss large numbers of
    classes
  • There is a positive correlation between boys
    grades and attendance.
  • Are boys absent because they are challenged, or
    challenged because they are absent? Are they
    bored? Disengaged?

27
What Makes a Classroom Successful for Students?
  • Across gender, grades and streams student
    identify a teacher who cares as key to a
    successful classroom in 85 of students.
  • Males and females identify teacher feedback as
    2nd key for males and 3rd key piece for females

28
What Makes a Successful Classroom
  • Girls say
  • 86 A teacher who cares
  • 79 Teacher feedback
  • 72 Feeling appreciated by teacher
  • 69 Choice in assignments
  • 65 Class discussion
  • 60 Group work
  • 55 Assignments that seem real
  • 51 Learning new things
  • 35 Use of technology
  • 33 Quiet classroom
  • Boys say
  • 85 A teacher who cares
  • 73 Choice in assignments
  • 62 Teacher feedback
  • 59 Learning new things
  • 58 Feeling appreciated by teacher
  • 52 Class discussion
  • 56 Group work
  • 49 Use of technology
  • 48 Fewer tests
  • 44 Assignments that seem real

29
Where do we go from here?
  • The survey results raise many questions that link
    to the SPCI focus on
  • Literacy
  • Use of technology
  • Engagement of students
  • Differentiated instruction

30
Making Connections
  • The data collected from our students links to the
    presentation by Dr. Rumens we need to ask more
    questions of the students in order to understand
    (e.g. When an assignment is not handed in, we
    need to ask the question What happened?) and we
    then need to listen to the answers

31
Agenda
  • Social and Academic Goals
  • Review of the Big Ideas of Differentiated
    Instruction
  • Learning Profile Cards
  • Tools to Know Your Learners
  • Developing a Plan

32
Academic and Social Goals
  • To deepen our understanding of differentiated
    instruction (DI)
  • To develop a plan to get to know our learners
    strengths needs and interests to be able to
    intentionally differentiate instruction
  • To invest in our own learning and the learning of
    others

33
Our System Goal
  • Delivering assessment-based instruction that
    is differentiated to intentionally support the
    strengths, needs and interests of each student to
    improve student achievement and success in all
    subjects and programs
    YRDSB Plan for
    Continuous Improvement

34
Big Idea Non Negotiable
  • Differentiation is responsive teaching rather
    than one size fits all teaching.

35
Big Idea
  • Knowing your learner in order to teach them well

36
Big Idea Non Negotiable
  • Quality differentiation depends on having clear
    curriculum targets
  • Differentiation must be an extension of, not a
    replacement for, high quality curriculum.
  • Tomlinson, 2000

37
Big Idea
  • Using varied instructional strategies for
    responding to readiness, interest, and learning
    profiles

38
Big Idea Non Negotiable
  • Flexible grouping that varies depending on
    readiness, interests and learning profile.

39
Differentiating Instruction
is a teachers response to learners needs guided
by
Ongoing assessment and adjustment
Start Here!
Teachers Can Differentiate Through
Process
Product
Content
Environment
according to students
Readiness Start where they are!
Interests -Make it meaningful!
Learning Profile -Build on their strengths!
Based on The Differentiated Classroom - Carol
Ann Tomlinson
40
Big Idea Non Negotiable
  • On-going assessment and adjustment is essential

41
Understanding the Learner
  • Students taught in their preferred learning
    styles demonstrated higher levels of achievement,
    showed more interest in the subject matter,
    approved of instructional methods, and wanted
    other subjects to be taught similarly.
  • Bell, L. (1986). Learning styles in the middle
    school classroom Why and how. Middle School
    Journal, 18(1), 18 19.

42
Learner Profile Cards
Gender Stripe
Auditory, Visual, Kinesthetic Modality
Analytical, Creative, Practical Sternberg
Students Interests
Multiple Intelligence Preference Gardner
Favorite subject
Nanci Smith,Scottsdale,AZ
43
Why do we need learning profiles?
  • Learning profile refers to how an individual
    learns best - most efficiently and effectively.
  • Teachers and their students may
  • differ in learning profile preferences.
  • Janet Rex ASCD 2009

44
Creating the Learner Profile
  • Interactive Tools
  • V.A.K.
  • http//www.usd.edu/trio/tut/ts/stylest.html
  • M.I.
  • http//www.bgfl.org/bgfl/custom/resources_ftp/clie
    nt_ftp/ks3/ict/multiple_int/questions/questions.cf
    m
  • Student Interests/Strengths
  • www.careercruising.ca (Matchmaker My Skills)
  • Paper Tools
  • http//www.e2c2.com/uploads/Learning_Profiles_Rety
    ped.doc
  • Karen Humes Start Where They Are CD-ROM
    (permission to copy, share, modify)

45
Tools for going deeper
Materials available at www.caroltomlinson.com
www.e2c2.com/fileupload.asp
Karen Humes Start Where They Are
46
A New Semester Continued Learning
  • How will we know we are on the right track?
  • 1. Share with an elbow partner.
  • Share in your larger group.
  • Pick a spokesperson to share with the whole group.

47
Exit Card
  • What I like about explicitly getting to know my
    students is
  • One question I am asking myself right now about
    DI is
  • One support I will require in getting to know my
    students further is
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com