Title: Bertrand Martin
1p17 tt? ee cross section p20 W helicity
prospects
Bertrand Martin for the LPSC group Dø France
Strasbourg 11/26/07
2Outline
- Status of the p17 ee selection
- success
- failures
- Around MET
- jet resolution
- Prospects for p20 W helicity
- improvements in the dilepton channel
-
3The dielectron signature
-
- The main physics backgrounds
- Drell-Yan Z/? jets ? ee / tt jets
- Diboson processes (WW , WZ , ZZ)
- Instrumental backgrounds (fake leptons and fake
MET)
2e top_tight pT gt 15 GeV
pT(1) gt 30 GeV pT(2) gt 20 GeV
2 high pT jets
- Further cuts
- 15 lt Meelt 80 GeV ? MET gt 40 GeV
- or
- Mee gt 100 GeV ? MET gt 35 GeV
- Sphericity gt 0.15
4Status of stt
Preliminary results approved for Moriond E.W.
2007
- 16 observed events , 9.5 expected ttbar ( for s
7 pb ) , 3.0 background - No optimization w.r.t. p14 analysis
- Still statistics dominated. However, large
systematics were also quoted - EMID 5.5 per object
- (?det , Fdet) ? accounted for (scale factors)
- ?R(e,closest jet) , inst. lumi ? not corrected
systematics
5EMID systematics
Assuming an efficiency depending on 3
variables e (?,F,?R)
(?,F) and ?R are independent variables
Efficiencies from the (?,F) spc files are
averaged over the ?R variation
Cant make a 3D .spc file
spc files may not be directly applied for ttbar
as the hidden variable is integrated over the
Zee spectrum
6EMID contd
Finally, after some more equations, one gets
Average reco ID efficiency of a Zee electron
Can be used for ttbar now
- Applying additional corrections on ttbar (?R ,
lumi) - does not change much the shape of the
distributions, - but rather the normalization 2.3 between
full / (?,F)
7Post-Moriond life
Along with the final JES / SSR , came a new
version of ReComputeMET , with a right way to
propagate jet smearing to MET. See the effect
for ee 2 jets
Post-Moriond propagation
Before Moriond no propagation
Numerous attempts to explain the MET oversmearing
in vain Some people suspect that jet
smearing might be too large.
8Jet Resolution Or How to absorb Mikkos work in
1 week ?
I dont know
Mikkos code developed for JCCA with special JES
corrections Switch to JCCB and usual JES, to
compare jet resolutions in data and MC
SSR Compute asymmetries in a dijet sample
extract jet resolution
y lt 0.4
Of course, not so simple
9Jet resolution , bias corrections
Equivalent gaussian core resolution
Reco cut 6 GeV
pT imbalance expected at particle level ( missing
? , µ )
10Raw Jet Resolution in CC
Data from sgaussian
Data from RMS
11Raw Jet Resolution in CC
MC no SSR from sgaussian
MC no SSR from RMS
12Jet Resolution - status
- This study is at its very beginning
- Cant conclude anything yet
- low pT region driven by ksoft corrections
- needs further checks
- CC needs punch-through tails correction at
high pT - ICR needs the double gaussian structure
- EC needs kbias corrections
- Dijet sample ? access to high pT jets resolution
- ( fits constrained above 20 30 GeV )
- While dielectron jets rather low pT
13Now, the future
( Once we are done with p17 MET)
p20 prospects get involved in the W Helicity
measurement
14Extracting f with log(L)
ljets
Dilepton
ljets and dilepton results are marginally
consistent (2.4s stat) ? Assumed it originates
from a statistical fluctuation proceed to
combination What about adding another 1 fb-1 in
each channel
15p17 W helicity
ttbar multivariate selection likelihood
discriminant Reconstruction of the 2 W
leptonic decays ( to find cos? ) 2 neutrinos
unknown momenta kinematically
underconstrained Algebraic resolution
needs mass assumptions ( MW , Mtop )
lepton / b jet pairing ambiguity
More powerful approaches Decorrelated
likelihood , N.N. , Boosted decision trees
Also room for improvement (see next slides)
16Kinematics
6 final state particles (2b , 2l, 2v) 3
independent variables ( px , py , pz ) 12
directly measured quantities ( 2b and 2l ) 2 MW
2 Mtop assumptions Last constraints in p17
18 unknowns
? 2 unknowns left
Quadratic equations give several solutions for
neutrino momenta
p17 way of picking up the right solution
17Alternative approach
Try an approach a-la neutrino weighting ( top
mass analysis )
Abandon the METx,y constraints
- Make an assumption on the neutrinos rapidities
gaussian - ? Enough constraints now
- Compute the neutrinos momenta
- Then one can compare the expected METx,y with
the observed MET (weight w)
Should give better results than the current
average ?
18Summary
Preliminary p17 cross section measurement (1.04
fb-1)
OLD
- Main analysis improvement EMID systematics
-
- BUT
- Cross section analysis stuck due to the MET
oversmearing - ? Waiting for the jet resolution results
- Optimization is the next step
-
- Publication
- W helicity
- the end
19Backup slides
20Fake electron background
- Fake electron jet faking electron, or a
non-isolated electron (b decay).
Includes QCD, Wjets ? ljets, ttbar? ljets - Signal/fake separation electron likelihood (1
for signal, 0 for background) - 2 steps
- Determination of likelihood shapes for
signal-like background-like samples - Likelihood fit to extract the background
contamination in the analysis sample.
Estimated from data
Signal sample Z?ee (incl)
Bkg sample (incl)
- Signal sample Z?ee , METlt15
- Background sample same topology as the
analysis sample, but require - 1 anti-isolated electron , MET lt 15
Likelihood fit determine ne and ns
21Fake MET background
- Main background Z/? jets ? ee jets
- no real MET (no ?) but fake MET can appear
due to resolution effects -
- MET may not be accurately modeled in the MC
- Fake rate measurement
- sample kinematically close to Zjets , with no
real MET ? jets sample
Estimated from data
Major impact of jets on MET
- Event yield calculation from analysis sample
in the low MET regime (reversed MET cut)
Yield in the low MET regime
22tt cross section
The cross section is extracted with a likelihood
minimization
where
The statistical error on s arises from the
likelihood minimization procedure
Compared to p14 results (425 pb-1)
Preliminary p17 result (1.04 fb-1)
23Z pT 0 jet
Parameterization with generated Z pT
Z pT 1 jet
24Z pT 2 jets
jets
25Jet 1 pT
Jet 2 pT