Title: Does Technology Influence Teaching Practices in the Classroom
1Does Technology Influence Teaching Practices in
the Classroom?
- April O. Di Benedetto
- NECC 2005
- Philadelphia, PA
2Purpose of the Study
- The purpose of the study was to determine
whether a state-supported staff development
program influenced teachers to shift their
teaching practices from teacher-centered to
student-centered learning.
3Limitations
- The participants were limited to teachers
employed with the select school district
participating in the study where their
administrator granted time for InTech training. - The sample group was limited to 200 InTech
trained and 200 Non InTech trained teachers. - The InTech trained sample group was limited to
teachers who had participated in an InTech
workshop in the state of Louisiana. - The variables were limited to student-centered
learning, utilization of a variety of technology
skills, teaching pedagogy, and attitudes toward
technology use in the classroom.
4Population
- A convenience sample of certified elementary
(K-6) teachers employed by the selected school
district was identified for this study. A total
of 400 subjects (200 InTech and 200 Non-InTech
trained teachers) were invited to complete the
survey.
5Research Design
- Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was
used to address the five research questions. - If the test was statistically significant,
multivariate univariate follow-up tests were
conducted.
6Data Collection Procedures
- The participants for this study consisted of the
elementary grade teachers (K-6) in the target
district. - This study was conducted using online data
collection via a survey. - Subjects were also given the option to complete a
paper and pencil survey. - The 400 subjects were selected from a data base
that maintains professional development records
for all teachers within the parish under study.
7Variables
- Student-Centered Learning Activities
- that provide the use of technology.
- Use of technology skills Experience
- level.
- Teaching pedagogy Instructional
- strategies.
- Attitude Use of technology in the
- classroom.
8Description of Sample
- Return Rates of Technology Survey for Each Group
- Training Type Requested
Online Paper Returned Return
rate - InTech Trained 200 109
3 112 56 - Non-InTech Trained 200
41 15 56
28 - Total 400 150
18 168 42
9Reliability
Reliability Analyses for the InTech Summative
Evaluation
10 Univariate Follow-Up Tests for Manova
Student-Centered Learning
- The study did not report a shift toward
student-centered learning. In this study,
student-centered learning was found to be not
statistically significant - F (4, 163) 1.70, p .20, ?² .01.
11Univariate Follow-Up Tests for Manova
Utilization of a Variety of Technology Skills
The study did not report a statistically
significant difference between the training
groups with respect to utilization of a variety
of technology skills. F (4, 163) 1.70, p
.20, ?² .56
12 Univariate Follow-Up Tests for Manova
Teaching Pedagogy
In this current study, InTech trained
teachers reported a significant difference from
Non-InTech trained teachers in regards to
teaching pedagogy. F (4, 163) 31.20, p lt
.001, ?² .16
13Univariate Follow-Up Tests for Manova Attitudes
of Teachers Toward Technology
In the present study, the reported attitudes
of InTech trained teachers toward technology use
in the classroom was supported by other research
conducted into the correlation of positive
attitudes towards technology and the amount of
technology training. F (4, 163) 9.56, p
.002, ?² .05
14Recommendations for Practice
- Conduct a needs assessment to determine preferred
training method. Offer a variety of trainings
that encourage teachers to integrate technology
into the classroom. - Provide technology facilitators for educators as
a means for providing support at the school level
by demonstrating in teachers classrooms
student-centered lessons. Also, the technology
facilitator could serve as a mentor to assist
teachers with planning of student-centered
lessons because teachers reported in this study
that they were not practicing methods that they
believed were student-centered learning. - Increase training hours previous studies reported
a statically significant increase in technology
integration when training spanned a three to four
year time frame. - Request evaluation feedback on every training
session in order to continue to improve the
training.
15Conclusion
- According to this study, educators believed
that student- centered learning was the most
appropriate method to integrate technology.
However, technology trained teachers reported
that student-centered technology activities were
not taking place in the classrooms.