Multidisciplinary Research Program of the University Research Initiative MURI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Multidisciplinary Research Program of the University Research Initiative MURI

Description:

design and discovery of new ones. A practical method for predicting solvation and separation ... from the flame to burning surface. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Suza157
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multidisciplinary Research Program of the University Research Initiative MURI


1
Multidisciplinary Research Program of the
University Research Initiative (MURI)
Accurate Theoretical Predictions of the
Properties of Energetic Materials Donald L.
Thompson (PI) Department of Chemistry University
of Missouri Columbia
2
Motivation
The need for more efficient, faster, and cheaper
methods for discovering new energetic
materials The Plan ? Develop theoretical
methods that can be used predict the critical
properties and behaviors of notional energetic
materials ? Provide theoretical guidance in the
development of new energetic materials ?
Better understanding of existing energetic
materials ? Advances in theoretical
computational methods
3
OVERARCHING GOALS
Predictive capabilities for energetic materials
applicable to the chemical decomposition of
condensed-phase energetic materials under
extreme conditions to enhance our understanding
of current materials and aid in the design and
discovery of new ones. A practical method for
predicting solvation and separation in
supercritical fluids.
4
Specific Goals
  • Potentials that describe the inter- and
    intra-molecular forces,
  • including phase transitions and chemical
    reactions.
  • Ab initio predictions of structures and
    properties
  • of solids at high temperatures and pressures.
  • Methods to predict mechanical properties and
  • physical changes in condensed phases.
  • Methods to predict chemical decomposition
  • in condensed phases, particularly ignition and
    sensitivity
  • in response to heating and shocking.
  • Methods for predicting temperatures of the
    condensed
  • phases and flames resulting from physical and
    chemical
  • changes, including a predictive model for the
    heat feedback
  • from the flame to burning surface.
  • Methods for predicting solvation and separation
    for energetic

5
Advances in basic theoretical methods
  • Advanced methods for ab initio treatments of
    condensed phase
  • materials, including chemical changes
  • Advanced methods for ab initio predictions of
    reaction energetics
  • New methods for using ab initio quantum
    chemistry methods in
  • conjunction with molecular dynamics methods
  • General universal atomic-level potentials for
    describing complex
  • chemical reaction, particularly for
    combustion of C,N,O,H systems.
  • Accurate methods for predicting molecular
    solubility
  • Improved practical methods for computing rates
  • Improved methods for performing atomic-level
    simulations
  • Methods for realistic simulations of chemistry
    in condensed phases

6
Transitioning the Methods
There are ongoing interactions with and feedback
from the Army for the immediate transitioning of
methods and results for DoD applications We are
working closely with Dr. Betsy Rice to
immediately hand off new developments The
models and methods are being continuously tested
and incorporated into Army modeling codes.
7
The Expertise
The MURI brings together the requisite expertise
to develop the theory, models, computational
methods, and computer codes for accurate
predictions of the properties and behaviors of
energetic materials.
8
The MURI Team
John E. Adams (University of Missouri, Columbia)
Flame-Surface Heat Exchange Herman L. Ammon
(University of Maryland) Crystal Models Rodney
J. Bartlett (University of Florida) Ab Initio
Potential Energy Surfaces Donald W. Brenner
(North Carolina State University) Reactive
Potentials David M. Ceperley and Richard M.
Martin (University of Illinois,
Urbana-Champaign) Quantum Simulations of
Materials Donald L. Thompson (University of
Missouri, Columbia) Simulations and Rates
Christopher J. Cramer and Donald G. Truhlar
(University of Minnesota) Separation and
Solvation
9
David M. Ceperley and Richard M.
MartinUniversity of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Development of Fundamental Methods for Prediction
    of
  • Properties of Materials Under Extreme Conditions
  • Develop methods for first-principles
    simulations
  • Provide benchmarks that can be used in
  • constructing universal force field models

10
Rodney J. BartlettUniversity of Florida
  • Ab Initio Predictions for Potential Energy
    Surfaces
  • for Chemical Reactions
  • ? Develop better Q.M. methods for computing
  • accurate PESs
  • Provide critical data for the classical
    potentials
  • ? Develop methods for direct dynamics

11
Herman L. AmmonUniversity of Maryland
  • Structure-Density-Heat of Formation-Sensitivity
    Predictions
  • Develop procedures for predictions of crystal
    structures,
  • densities and heats of formation of energetic
    materials
  • Investigate the relationships between crystal
  • structure/microstructure and sensitivity,
    compressibility,
  • polymorphism and crystal shape
  • Test procedures by predictions for known
    energetic
  • materials

12
Donald W. BrennerNorth Carolina State University
  • Quantum-Based, Reactive Potentials for Simulating
    Shock
  • Dynamics of Condensed-Phase Energetic Materials
  • A Bridge between Ab Initio Calculations and
    Experimental
  • Shock Dynamics
  • Developing a transferable analytic reactive
    potential for C,H,O,N species,
  • e.g., RDX HMX, based on a bond-order
    formalism and ab initio data that
  • will enable large-scale, 3-D MD simulations
  • ? Validating specific reaction paths and rates
  • Will predict system properties related to shock
    initiation and detonation
  • for a wide range of energetic materials
  • Bridge molecular ab initio studies and the
    macroscale properties of shocked,
  • condensed-phase energetic materials
  • ? Validation of the potentials across length
    scales
  • ? Initial focus Hydrazine, RDX and HMX.

13
John E. AdamsUniversity of Missouri, Columbia
  • Gas-Liquid Interactions Flame-Surface Heat
    Exchange
  • Develop accurate models to aid in the prediction
    of the burning
  • rate of solid-phase energetic materials
  • Predictions of the temperature of the fluid
    layer that forms between
  • the flame and the underlying solid surface
  • Develop quantitative model for the energy
    feedback from
  • flame to surface.
  • Link the MURI condensed-phase models with the
    steady-state
  • continuum model of Miller and Anderson

14
Christopher J. Cramer and Donald G. Truhlar
University of Minnesota
  • Prediction of Separation and Solvation Behavior
  • ? Develop models for computing free energies of
    transfer
  • of molecules between the gas phase, the
    liquid phase,
  • and the solid phase, and into supercritical
    fluids.
  • ? Base models on both semiempirical and
    first-principles
  • methods
  • Achieve a better understanding of the
    solubility and other
  • properties of substances in supercritical
    fluids
  • Employ that understanding to develop
    supercritical fluid
  • technologies for recycling and reclamation of
    energetic
  • materials

15
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com