Title: Materials Resources Strategy Workshop 4
1Materials Resources StrategyWorkshop 4
2Introduction Round-Up of Progress to Date
- Dr Alison Millward
- MRS Lead Facilitator
3 What Are We Doing Here?
- Preparing an over-arching document
- the Hampshire MRS
- full involvement of stakeholders
- to include action plans
4MRS Links
- Waste Strategy
- Land Use Planning
- Societal Change
5Achievements
- Vision and aims
- Principles
- Strategic objectives
6Vision
- We will change the way we use material
resources to maximise efficiency and minimise
wasteage
7Aims
- To change minds and practises to use all material
resources efficiently, minimising wastage at all
stages - Where waste is produced, maximise opportunities
for everyone to re-use, recycle and recover value
of the waste materials
8Aims
- To extract primary material resources only where
it can be shown that the need cannot be met in a
more acceptable way - To dispose of unavoidable waste in the best
possible way
9Progress To Date
- This is the 4th of 7 workshops
- 5 process chain groups
- 14 resource stream groups
- briefing papers produced
- information available on
- www.mrs-hampshire.co.uk
10Last Week LGA Conference
- The Material Resources Strategy is a good
example of holistic thinking...it is exactly the
kind of innovative thinking that we want to
encourage in Local Authorities - Elliot Morley
11Focus of Workshop 4
- Feedback on process chain work
- Feedback on resource group work
- Choosing objectives for appraisal
- Moving forward on the MRS project programme
- Stakeholder endorsement of the MRS process next
steps
12Still To Do After Workshop 4
- Appraisal of options
- Establish criteria for determining where
facilities will be best located - Develop action plans
- Completion of MRS document
13Feedback on Engaging the Process Chain
- Campbell Williams
- Hampshire County Council
14Process Chain
- To change minds and practices to use resources
efficiently, minimising wastage at all stages
15Developing the Process Streams
- Build upon the 31 March workshop
- Used experts and stakeholders
- All discussions involved Entec
- Papers developed in response
16Elements of the Process Chain
- Design
- Business Practices
- Retail
- Procurement
- Consumption
17Experts Include . . . . . .
- British Retail Consortium
- Boots
- Surrey Institute of Art and Design
- Waste Watch
- Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply
18Results
- Factor Four improvement required
- Difficult to quantify practically
- Real opportunities for change
- What can we achieve?
- Cross cutting themes
19Cross Cutting Themes
- Increase awareness
- Formal education and training
- Develop markets
- Influence key sectors
20Design
- 75 of an objects environmental impact
determined during design - Huge opportunity in South-East
- Cost, legislation and reputation as drivers
- MRS can act as overall driver
21Opportunities in Hampshire
- Green products guides
- Design competitions
- Sustainability into design courses
- Delegations from leading countries
- Lobby on issues identified as barriers
- Target main consumers of material
22Next Steps
- Develop cross-cutting themes
- Radical delivery ideas
- Links to resource stream issues
- Appraise options
- Develop action and delivery plans
23Next Steps
- Quantify possible changes
- Links to European examples
- Stakeholder involvement
24Feedback on Resource Group Work (End of Life
Vehicles)
- Julian Lucraft
- What did we do and how did we do it?
25First Steps
- Formed a research strategy
- Decided how we were going to operate
- Gathered initial thoughts
26Initial Thoughts
- Used Experts to identify a benchmark
- Waste streams produced
- Current operations within the industry
- Discussions with industry
- Current industry performance
- Possible Best Practices
- Identified possible buttons that we could press
27Resource Group Actions - 1
- Meeting held 28th June - lively and conclusive
discussions - Current operations scenario clearly defined -
knowledgeable group members - Focussed in on Stretching Best Practice
scenario
28Resource Group Actions - 2
- produced conclusions at meeting
- paper produced
- verified paper with members
29Points of Note
- effective co-ordination with other resource
groups - further research
- e.g. sustainability map
30An Appraisal Approach to Identifying a Preferred
Solution for the MRS
31Content of Presentation
- What is an appraisal?
- Why are we doing them?
- How are they done?
- What do we have to do today?
32What is an Appraisal?
- An objectives led, qualitative assessment of
plans, policies, programmes and projects
33Why are we Doing Appraisals?
- To identify the social, economic and
environmental performance of the options - To suggest ways to improve the performance, if
required - To feed into other processes
- e.g. BPEO and SEA
34How is an Appraisal Done?
- Identify the options
- Develop the objectives
- Gather supporting information
- Appraisal workshops
- Put forward recommendations
35What do we have to do today?
- Discuss and agree the objectives
- Indicate priorities
36Any Questions?
37Introduction to the Appraisal Discussion Session
38Feedback on the Appraisal
39Feedback on Appraisal
40Feedback on the Appraisal
41Feedback on the Appraisal
42Moving ForwardMRS Project Programme
- Richard Read
- Head of Minerals and Waste Planning
- Hampshire County Council
43Preparation
Consultation
(Statutory)
MRS Core Strategy (MWDF
DPD)
Preparation
MRS Sites
(MWFD DPDs X2)
Consultation
(Statutory)
MW DS
Community Workshops
Sites
Proposals Map
Sites
Appraisal
(SEA, SA, BPEO)
Draft Reports / Final Reports
Consultation
(Statutory)
Statement of Community
Involvement (SCI)
Draft
Core Strategy / SCI
Public Examinations (All
DPDs SCI)
Sites
MRS Supplementary (MWDF SPDs)
Municipal Waste Management Strategy etc.
Minerals Waste Development Scheme
(MWDS)
Annual
Report
Annual
Report
Annual
Report1
Submission /
Adoption
Projects
D
N
O
S
A
J
J
M
A
D
N
O
S
A
J
J
M
A
M
F
J
D
N
O
S
A
J
J
M
A
M
F
J
2004
2005
2006
1 Dummy - Submission to SoS - Community
Workshops
Month
Month
Month
Month
44Core Strategy
- 23 September
- Resource recovery options
- 11 November
- Unavoidable waste / minerals
- 2 December
- Spatial options / draft strategy
45March 2005
- Draft Core Strategy
- Proposals Map
- Draft Environmental Report
- Draft Consultation Strategy
46And then . . . . . .
- Summer / Autumn 2005 Submission to Secretary of
State - Spring 2006
- Public examination and adoption
- Winter 2006
- Inspectors report / adoption
47MRS sites
- Spring 2005 Community debate and Integra review
- Summer 2005 Draft site plans draft environment
report, and proposals map modifications - 2006 Submission
48MRS projects
- During 2005 and onwards, projects will commence
across all aspects of Materials Resources
Strategy
49Unavoidable Waste and Minerals
- At the September workshop
- The options on unavoidable waste will be debated
- Mineral supply issues will also be debated
50Spatial Issues
- At the November workshop
- Dispersed vs concentrated facilities
- Generic locations
- Resource recovery parks
- Mineral prospect areas
51Introduction to The Way Forward Discussion
Session
52Discussion Points
- MRS Project programme
- Is it realistic?
- Does it provide sufficient public engagement?
53Unavoidable Waste Discussion Points
- What resources do you need to make judgements?
- Technical briefings
- Data on web-site
- Off-line workshops
- Newsletters
54Discussion Points
- Mechanisms for finalising preferred options
- Off-line workshops
- Aggregation exercises
55- Summary of outputs
- Discussion on appraisal approach
- Prioritisation of objectives
- Unavoidable waste issues
- Re-connection to minerals work
- Forward programme for MRS
- Sign up for off-line work
56Next Steps
- Resource Groups - August/September meetings
- Workshop 5 - 23 September
- Workshop 6 - 11 November
- Evaluation forms - on your table
- Expenses
57Thank you