Title: Interpersonal%20Knowledge%20Sharing:
1Interpersonal Knowledge Sharing
- The Low-Tech, High-Touch Side of Knowledge
Management
2Objectives
- To present one perspective on the theory and
practice of knowledge sharing, a humanistic
counterpoint to mechanistic knowledge management.
- To illustrate how knowledge sharing can be
encouraged (not managed). - To open a discussion of best practices in this
area.
3Agenda
- Overview of NCR
- Status of Knowledge Management at NCR
- Two Models of Knowledge Management
- Sharing Knowledge Over Mail Lists
- Impact on NCRs Business
- The Art and Science of Fostering CoPs
- Discussion
4NCR Corporation
- Revenue 6 billion
- Employees 32,000 in
- 80 countries
- Headquarters Dayton, Ohio
- Key Offerings
- Relationship TechnologyTM Solutions built on
- Teradata Warehousing (TD)
- Automated Teller Machines (FSD)
- Retail Point-of-Sale Systems (RSD)
- Consumable Media and Supplies (SMD)
- Comprehensive Service and Support (WCSD)
5NCR Corporation
- Strategic Challenge
- Transition from a product manufacturer
(1880-1990) - to a solution provider (1990-2000).
- New Environment The virtual workplace
- KM Implications
?
6NCR Corporation
- Strategic Challenge
- Transition from a product manufacturer
(1880-1990) - to a solution provider (1990-2000).
- New Environment The virtual workplace
- KM Implications
- Legacy knowledge is both asset and liability
- New knowledge and skills needed throughout
company - Much (most?) innovation occurs in the field, not
at plants or headquarters - Field personnel are physically more isolated
7NCRs Initial Approach to KM
- Corporate KM Champion Assigned (1995)
- Initial Focus - Capture/re-use of knowledge
gained in professional services engagements - Parallel efforts in several business units,
particularly customer services - Corporate team sponsored KAM - the Knowledge
Asset Manager (based on Notes)
8NCRs Knowledge Asset Mgr.
9KAM Communities
10Status of KM at NCR
- Business Units are driving requirements and
projects - Informal cross-BU collaboration
- New cross-BU initiative for Professional Services
Automation using Changepoint - Growing awareness of importance of communities of
interest and practice - New KM Community of Practice founded in January
2002
11KM Evolution
12KM Lessons Learned
- The value proposition must start with your people
- A knowledge-sharing culture is critical to
embracing knowledge management - KM best practices must be integrated with
business processes - Collaboration is key to knowledge transfer
- Recognizing, rewarding and measuring KM best
practices must be balanced and consistent. - Technology serves only as an enabler
13Todays Starting Point
- Knowledge exists only in human heads.
14Two Ways to Transfer Knowledge
15Two Ways to Transfer Knowledge
16A KM/KS Comparison Matrix
17A Model of Associate Competence
18Competence Stereotypes
Others?
19Knowledge Transfer Strategies
KNOWLEDGE DOMAIN
NARROW
MODERATE
BROAD
20Knowledge Transfer Strategies
KNOWLEDGE DOMAIN
NARROW
MODERATE
BROAD
EXAMPLE
Telephone Fault Diagnosis
On-Site System Installation
Enterprise Information
Resolution
Maintenance
Architecture Design
CONTEXT
CCC
PS
Field CE
Structured Knowledge
On-line Databases
On-line Databases
STRATEGY
Capture and Guided
Practitioner Knowledge
Practitioner Knowledge
Rediscovery
Exchange
Exchange
TOOLS
Databases
Databases
Databases
Internet access
Internet access
On-line Manuals
Guided Search Interface
Communities of Practice
Communities of Practice
(
CoP)
(
CoP)
METRICS
Time-to-solve
Time-to-solve
Win/loss ratio
Escalation levels
No. of visits
Billable time ratio
Customer sat.
Customer sat.
Customer sat.
APPLICABLE MODEL
Personal Communication
Information Processing
21Applying the KS Model
- Professional Services -
Design Specs
N
N
C
S
Internet Technology
Field Experience
C
S
Mentored Practice
New College Hire
Professional Consultant
Community of Practice
Customer
Information Communication
22Applying the KM Model - 1997
- Worldwide Remote Services -
Design Specs
N
C
CBR Technology
Field Experience
S
Dialog Prompts
Para-Technical Call Taker
Technical Diagnostician
Comprehensive Knowledge Solution
23Applying the KM Model - 2002
- Customer Care Center -
Design Specs
N
C
CKS Technology
Field Experience
S
Guided Search
Para-Technical Call Taker
Technical Diagnostician
CoP
Comprehensive Knowledge Solution
24Supporting the KS Model
- Continuous Knowledge Sharing
- Mailing Lists
- Periodicals (external and internal)
- Regular Symposia
- Communities of Practice
- Just In Time Knowledge Sharing
- Mailing Lists
- Expert locator (e.g. AskMe.com)
25NCRs Web-Archived Mail Lists
- Released in late 1995
- Target users Field practitioners
- Design bias Field-to-field communications
- Uneven management sponsorship
- Pilot (95 - 96)
- Production (97 - 99)
- Orphan (99 )
26Mailing List Architecture
27Mailing List Architecture
28Mailing List Architecture
29Mailing List Architecture
30Mailing List Architecture
31Mail List Statistics
- Released November 1995
- Total Lists 525
- Active Lists (lt90d) 78 (15)
- (lt30d) 53 (10)
- Current subscribers 13,000
- Current subscriptions 50,000 (4/subscriber)
- Cumulative Postings 62,000
- Contributors 9,000
- Author Distribution 51231573.8.1
32Keys to Successful KS
- Start with existing relationships
- Provide simple, unobtrusive communication support
(participation must be optional) - Support de facto community leaders
- Publicize (but dont hype) successes
- Do not impose formal objectives on participation
and contribution - Do not introduce new processes and procedures
- Allow good things to happen...
33Mailing List Study - ATR
- Created October 1996 30 subscribers
- Initial Name Advanced Tech. Research
- Purpose News alerts from ATR director
- Signal Event Reply All in December 1996
- First Discussion 13 Jan 1997 (4 replies)
- Renamed A Terrific Resource (Jan. 1999)
- Current subscribers 940
- Cumulative Postings 13,000 over 5 years
- Contributors 1,000
34A Week In the Life of ATR
New Messages 19 -gt Replies 19
Total 38
(ca. 7/day)
35Business Impact 1 - Prima Facie
- The statistics on the previous slides suggest a
strong prima facie case for the business value of
the mailing lists
36Business Impact 2 - War Stories
- Supporting new sales
- I presented our CRM solution to the decision
makers of a bank in Hong Kong. We won that deal
due to some key messaging and positioning of our
product compared to our competitors. I posted my
presentation on the CRM List. A number of
responses indicated it would help them position
us against our competitors in the future.
Australia - Value Not disclosed - Solving customer problems
- In Dec 01 we upgraded a large Teradata site. A
hidden problem popped up all of a sudden which
was a very critical issue for business users at
the site. A quick shot to ATR revealed a known
issue elsewhere in the world and 24 hrs later a
patched version could be deployed. Austria -
Value 1.8M annually - Improving NCR solutions
- The ss-fbd-emv mailing list was fundamental
during the development of the FBD EMV Application
Kernel and in obtaining the first EMV Level 2
approval for an ATM Application in the world.
Europe - Value US 5 million over 3 years.
37Business Impact 3 - ROI
- Initial cost 75 K 15 K (HW)
- Ongoing costs 60 K (10 K/yr.)
- Value of
- Deals won 1 M
- Time saved 1 M
- Deals influenced 1 M
- Customers retained 1 M
- Competitors thwarted 1 M
38Business Impact 3 - ROI
- Initial cost 75 K 15 K (HW)
- Ongoing costs 60 K (10 K/yr.)
- Value of
- Deals won 1 M
- Time saved 1 M
- Deals influenced 1 M
- Customers retained 1 M
- Competitors thwarted 1 M
39Definition of Community
- A Community of Practice is an informal network of
people engaged in a particular profession,
occupation, or job function who actively seek to
work more effectively and to understand their
work more fully.
40Communities and Organizations
41Communities and Organizations
42Community Ecosystem
43Community Ecosystem
44Community Ecosystem
45The Invisible Key to Success
- Communities of practice are the shop floor of
human capital, the place where the stuff gets
made. - They're like professional societies. People
join and stay because they have something to
learn and to contribute. The work they do is the
joint and several property of the group--cosa
nostra, our thing." - - Tom Stewart
- Fortune
- 5 August 1996
46Reflections on Community - 1
- The problem is that corporate types don't know
from community. They think network. They think
conference. They think in safe, gray office
metaphors that don't rock the boat. Their only
question is, "So, how are you better than
NetMeeting, Microsoft's conferencing software?" - - Chris Tacy, Underdeveloped
- NYT Cybertimes
- 2 July 1997
47Reflections on Community - 2
- Learning is social, but not all groups learn
- It is possible to
- Seed new communities
- Enhance existing communities
- Link formal and informal learning
- Align community and organizational objectives
48The Community Life Cycle
49The Community Life Cycle
50Conclusions
- Knowledge sharing is essential to KM
- Knowledge sharing is a natural part of natural
community behavior - Communities can be seeded, fostered, guided, and
supported, but not managed - Successful communication technologies are simple
and convenient - Knowledge sharing is incomplete and messy
- The ROI on simple technologies can be very high
51Discussion
- Thoughts on the KS/KM models?
- Other examples of ways to support KS?
- Policies? - Research?
- Processes?
- Technologies?
- Other examples? Counter-examples?
- Impact of emerging technologies
- Wireless communications
- Real-time language translation
- Others?