SNAP Management Plan

1
SNAP Management Plan

• WBS 1.1
• Peter R. Harvey
• Space Sciences Laboratory
• University of California at Berkeley
• July 2002

2
Management, Cost Schedule Breakout Structure

• RD Management Plan P. Harvey
• RD Risk Management and Controls R. DiGennaro
• Cost and Schedule Methodology P. Harvey
• Cost and Estimate Collection D. Peterson
• Cost and Schedule Details (as required)

3
RD Management Plan Outline

• Project RD Organization and Roles
• RD Science Organization and Roles
• Institutional Organization and Roles
• Management Emphasis and Work Breakdown Structure
• Deliverables
• Budget and Schedule
• Summary

4
SNAP RD Phase Organization
5
SNAP RD Management Roles

• Principal Investigator (PI) Perlmutter LBNL
• Overall scientific leadership
• Principal responsibility for scientific mission
• Directs work of Science Working Groups
• Develops scientific requirements for project
• Principal Interface with External Science
  Advisory Committee
• Collaboration Spokesperson and spokesperson for
  the Project
• Project Director (PD)/Co-PI Levi LBNL
• Directs RD activities
• Interfaces with PI on science requirements
• Interfaces with PM and DPM on conduct, progress
  of RD programs
• Responsible for generation of CDR
• Project Manager (PM) Heetderks SSL
• Oversees execution of RD tasks, with emphasis on
  SSL tasks
• Manages cost/schedule for RD
• Tracks progress on deliverables
• Develops cost/schedule data for construction
  phase
• Develops project controls, PMP (Project
  Management Plan) for construction phase

6
SNAP RD Management Roles (cont.)

• Deputy Project Manager(DPM) DiGennaro LBNL
• Assists PM with oversight, with emphasis on LBNL
  tasks
• Assists PM in areas of cost/schedule tracking
• Assists PM in development of cost/schedule and
  project structure for construction phase
• Project Office Systems Engineering
• Provides QA, safety guidance in project planning
• Provides systems engineering services for project
  development
• Tracks and reports on expenditures, technical
  progress with RD tasks
• Task Leaders
• Execute RD tasks
• Generate management reports for Project Office
• Communicate technical results
• Develop cost/schedule data for construction phase
• Provide input for CDR
• Project Advisory Committee
• Assess status of SNAP on continuing basis
• Technical progress and management
• Provides feedback to LBNL Directorate

7
Science Working Groups Centered Under Principal
Investigator
Establishment of Science Requirements
8
SNAP RD Science Roles

• Science Working Groups
• Develop and refine science mission for SNAP
• Develop performance requirements for instrument,
  and overall mission
• Develop operations scenarios required to achieve
  science goals
• Collaboration Council
• Collaboration Executive Board
• Lead scientist from each collaborating
  institutions
• Establishes scientific goals and objectives
• Advises the Principal Investigator
• Develops policy for membership and publication.
• External Science Advisory Committee
• Provide input to PI on science goals
• Analyze and critique output from Science Working
  Groups
• Provide support for SNAP through available
  channels

9
SNAP RD Organization Structured to Foster
Development and Project Evolution

• Emphasis placed on areas with required enabling
  technologies - Instrument
• Experienced personnel selected who can commit to
  the Project
• H. Heetderks Project Manager (SSL)
• Strong Aerospace/NASA experience
• Managed EUVE Spacecraft Development
• Recently completed successful IMAGE FUV
• R. DiGennaro Deputy Project Manager (LBNL),
• Strong DOE project experience
• Successfully completing SNS Front-End Systems
  (July 2002)
• Collaboration for Science development Project
  for Mission development
• Science requirements and trades flow down
• Deliverables and development results flow up
• Trades developed with project Systems
  Engineering for PI decision

10
Formal Institutional Commitments Follow Funding
Sources During RD/Concept

• Funding from DOE to SSL through LBNL via UC
  Regents transfer
• Project control via statement of work
• Space Sciences Laboratory telescope, spacecraft
  
• Funding from DOE directly to institution
• Project control via Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
• University of Michigan near-infrared detectors
• Funding from non-DOE source directly to
  institution
• Project control via MOA
• IN2P3-INSU (CNRS/CNES France) spectrograph

11
Management Emphasis

• Focus on deliverables and milestones
• Highest priority given to development in major
  technical and schedule risk areas
• Technical
• CCD Development
• NIR Detector Development
• Schedule
• Telescope
• Conceptual Phase trades directed towards fully
  optimized configuration

12
SNAP Work Breakdown Structure
13
Major Deliverables

• Item Completion Date
• Zeroth-Order Design Report 1-Aug-2003
• Draft Requirements Review 1-Aug-2003
• Long Lead Procurement/ Budget Request 1-Oct-2003
• Systems Engineering Management Plan 1-Feb-2004
• Performance Assurance Implementation Plan
  (Draft) 1-Feb-2004
• Risk Management Plan 1-Feb-2004
• OTA S/C Study RFPs 1-Feb-2004
• OTA S/C Study Contracts 1-Apr-2004
• Preliminary Project Execution Plan 1-May-2004
• Preliminary Hazards Analysis 1-May-2004
• Systems Requirements Review 1-Jul-2004
• Conceptual Design Report/Review 1-Aug-2004

14
Instrument RD Deliverables

• SNAP HgCdTe characterization, specifications, and
  acquisition plan.
• SNAP preproduction CCD with full
  characterization, specifications, and production
  plan.
• CCD readout ASIC core prototype.
• Spectrograph image slicer prototype
  characterization.
• Instrument readout electronics concept.
• HgCdTe readout strategy and implementation path.
• Filter set and mounting concept.
• Particle shield performance study and refined
  mass estimate.
• Shutter concept.

15
Telescope RD Deliverables

• Telescope Requirements Specification Document
• Subcontractors Final Reports
• Metering Structure Concept Trades
• Telescope Mirror Materials Trade Study
• OTA Thermal Model and Results Summary
• Focusing/Alignment Tolerance Analysis
• Focusing/Alignment Mechanism Trade Study
• Front Aperture Door Trade Study
• Integration Flow and Test Plan
• Preliminary Stray Light Analysis
• Shutter Mechanism Reliability Failure Modes
  Study
• Telescope acquisition plan schedule/milestones,
  cost.

16
Spacecraft RD Deliverables

• Spacecraft Bus
• Spacecraft Bus Performance Requirements
• Spacecraft Bus Studies
• Mechanical and Electrical Systems Concepts
• Environmental, Quality, Programmatic
  Requirements
• Integration and Test Plan Draft
• Construction Cost and Schedule
• Attitude Control System / Guider
• Preliminary SNAP ACS Model
• Performance Requirements on Guider System
• Draft S/C Interface
• Draft Integration and Test Plan with S/C
• Telemetry
• Final Concept Design Communications Requirements
• Ground System(s) Make/Buy Decisions
• Integration and Test of Ground and Space Segment
  Compatibility

17
Ground Segment RD Deliverables

• Mission Operations
• High-speed K band telemetry upgrade concept
• High speed data link design from Mission
  Operations Center at SSL to Science Operations
  Center at LBNL
• Contingency plan for back-up ground station
• Science Operations
• Software Requirements Document
• SNAP Data Archive Specification
• Calibration Plan
• Software Interface Control Document
• Software Framework Specification Document
• Simulation code
• Parametrized instrument emulation in SNAPfast
• Prototype full pixel-level instrument response
  emulation in SNAPsim
• Testbed code identifying data processing
  bottlenecks

18
Full Project Schedule Underscores Areas to
Emphasize During RD
19
Top Level RD Schedule
20
Summary

• The management organization is in place to direct
  the RD effort
• Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined
• Emphasis is on deliverables and interim
  milestones
• Schedules and budgets are focused on areas
  needing greatest development or having longest
  lead times