SU2 U1 and the nature of light - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SU2 U1 and the nature of light

Description:

... thermodynamics: phase diagram. deconfining. preconfining ... horizon-volume of solar system moves into regions which, formerly, were causally disconnected: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: wolfgang80
Category:
Tags: diagram | light | nature | solar | su2 | system

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SU2 U1 and the nature of light


1
SU(2) U(1) and the nature of light
COSMO 2005 31 August 2005 Bonn
Ralf Hofmann Universitäten Frankfurt/Heidelberg
hep-th/0504064 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 4123
(2005), hep-th/0507033 hep hep-th/0507122,
hep-ph/0508176, hep-th/0508212
2
Outline
3
Motivation for
SU(2) U(1)
4
WMAP 1-year release of temperature map
5
temperature-polarization cross correlation at
large angles
?
power spectrum of TE cross correlation excess
compared to primordial prediction ! (reionization
versus mobile electric monopoles at
)
6
more motivation
  • Universes equation of state
  • (slowly rolling Planck-scale axion)
  • nontrivial ground state physics related to
  • physics of photon propagation?
  • (invisible
    ether)
  • intergalactic magnetic fields ?
  • (condensed, electrically charged monopoles)

7
SU(2) Yang-Mills thermodynamics, nonperturbatively
8
SU(2) Yang-Mills thermodynamics
at large temperatures spatial coarse-graining
over both
topological fluctuations (large, topology
changing quantum fluctuations, calorons)
plane-wave fluctuations (small quantum
fluctuations, perturbation theory)
  • induce magnetic monopole constituents in calorons
  • induce interactions between monopoles
  • after coarse-graining
  • pure-gauge configuration
  • provide spatial correlations to resolve the
    infrared catastrophe
  • after coarse-graining
  • inert adjoint scalar with dependent
    modulus
  • quasiparticle masses by Higgs mechanism

Polyakov 1974,Nahm 1980, Lee Lu 1998, Kraan
van Baal 1998, Brower et al. 1998, Diakonov et a.
2004, Ilgenfritz et al. 2005,
9
SU(2) Yang-Mills thermodynamics phase diagram
confining
preconfining
deconfining
ground state CVL condensate
(spin-1/2) excitation
single and self-intersecting CVLs

ground state monopole condensate plus
collapsing, closed magnetic flux lines (CVL)
(spin-1)
excitation massive, dual mode apparent
gauge-symmetry breaking
ground state short-lived (attracting) BPS
monopoles and antimonopoles (
) plus dilute, screened
BPS monopoles and antimonopoles (spin-1)
excitations two massive modes one massless
mode apparent gauge-symmetry breaking

Hage-dorn
2nd order
10
microscopics of ground-state dynamics
deconfining phase
inert adjoint scalar after spatial
coarse-graining
pure gauge after spatial
coarse-graining
11
quasiparticle excitations after spatial
coarse-graining
Yang-Mills scale
quasiparticle mass
effective gauge coupling
12
one-loop evolution of with temperature
monopole condensation, decoupling of
magnetic-charge conserving atrractor
SU(2)
SU(3)
magnetic charge of isolated monopole after
screening
monopoles mobile close to phase transition CMB
gets polarized at large angles !
mass of isolated monopole after screening
quasiparticle mass
13
pressure at one-loop
14
energy density at one-loop
today
small correction to dark-energy content of the
Universe (Planck-scale axion)
15
electric-magnetic coincidence
at
electric coupling , magnetic
coupling (dynamically stabilized)
  • free photon gas (no screening,
    decoupled )
  • 2. (i) not yet a coupling of the photon to the
    monopole condensate
  • (ii) photon massless,
  • (iii) rest-frame of heat bath not visible in
    single photon propagation (invisible ether),
  • (iv) superconductivity of ground state
    (intergalactic magnetic fields ?) barely visible

coincide!
(neither dynamical magnetic charges (screening)
nor condensed electric charges (photon mass)
measureable)
16
CMB fluctuations at large angles as radiative
corrections
dominant diagram
subject to compositeness constraints
(plane-wave quantum fluctuations softer than
, harder fluctuations integrated out into
)
radiative corrections to pressure at most 0.2
Herbst, RH, Rohrer 2004
17
dominant correction
for
dipole contribution in temperature map of CMB
(computed with upper bound for modulus when
! )
18
kinematical plus dynamical generation of dipole
anisotropy ?
  • solar system moves w.r.t. CMB rest frame
  • km/s
    Peebles Wilkinson 1968
  • horizon-volume of solar system moves into
    regions which,
  • formerly, were causally disconnected

kin
lt
kindyn
kin
kindyn
19
Summary and Outlook
Universe today possibly dynamically stabilized at
boundary between deconfining and preconfining
phase of SU(2) Yang-Mills theory of scale
invisible ether structureless condensate of
electric monopoles
(electric-magnetic concidence)
after jump to preconfining phase Universes
ground state
visibly superconducting
monopole condensate small correction to
Universes dark-
energy content
large-angle part of CMB power spectra radiative
corrections in
deconfining
phase of
(mobile and dilute
monopoles)
20
Summary and Outlook
future work
  • computation of two-loop correction to pressure
    in an FRW background
  • at low
  • computation of various thermal two-point
    correlators in Minkowski
  • space and FRW background with or without axion
    background
  • polarization power spectra and CP
    violation
  • rate of axion rolling necessary for jump to
    preconfining phase
  • (violation of thermal equilibrium)

21
(No Transcript)
22
Typical situation in thermal perturbation theory
taken from Kajantie et al. 2002
23
SU(2)
taken from van Baal Kraan 1998
24
Does fluctuate?
quantum mechanically
No !
compositeness scale
thermodynamically
No !
25
Thermodynamical self-consistency
pressure (one-loop)
however Higgs-induced masses and ground-state
pressure both - dependent
- derivatives involve also implicit dependences
relations between thermod.quantities
violated
.
26
Relaxation to the minima
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com