Earth Wind Fire Water:

1

• Earth Wind Fire Water
• simulations four needs
• Ed Kruzins, Director General Simulation
• SIAA AGM 24 Aug 2006

2

• Earth-growth
• What does Defence need from Simulation ?
• Wind-push
• What does Defence need from ADSO ?
• Fire-create
• What does Defence need from Industry ?
• Water-nourish
• What does Industry need from Defence ?

3
Earth

• What does Defence need from Simulation?
• Risk without consequence.
• Ability to play without regard, do things we have
  not done.
• Objective traceable decision support.
• Employing the force
• Support to training, operations at service, joint
  and combined levels
• Developing the force
• Support to capability life cycle and decision
  making.
• Link strategy-capability-acquisition with ops and
  lessons.
• Allow earlier industrial and scientific
  involvement

4
Defence Outcomes
Developing the Force
Employing the Force
CJOC
CCDE
Simulation Champion

• Command
• of Operations
• Planning
• Performance
• Manage ADF commitments
• Preparedness

Defence Functions Supported

• Capability Development
• Strategic policy
• Capability development
• Acquisition and through life support
• Stewardship of resources
• Advice to Force Employment

Strategy
CDE, DMO
JOC, Navy, Army, Air Force, IS
Stakeholders
DSTO, CFO, DSP, CIO, DPE
Industry
Other External Organisations
5
Developing the Force Capability Life Cycle.
6
Wind

• What does Defence expect of ADSO ?
• DIG Ops 42-1
• enhance capabilities, save resource, reduce risk,
• Governance, standards, collaborate, encourage,
  develop sim capability
• Help simulations to answer key questions
• Shape coherence
• services, joint, combined (US NATO)
• Develop the vision and broker marriages
• Simulation Roadmap
• Promote, fund and seed
• Minors program , SSSO panel
• Revamp ADSO to meet new challenges

7
Comments from Simtect

• Perceptions of ADSO I noted
• Office needs to be more accessible to help with
  simulation information. Eg support to bidding,
  standards, governance
• Army orientation?
• Not sufficiently articulating the future sim
  vision or plan
• Industrial sim facilities are not getting
  sufficient support
• Simulation standing offer panel needs to be
  reviewed

8
What keeps me up at night

• Delivering JCTC on time, and post TS07, what
  next?
• Completing the Simulation Roadmap
• Clever evolution of legacy simulation
  capabilities
• Simulators, emulators and stimulators
• AF, Navy, Army, Joint Simulation working Groups
  policies
• Coalition sim relations (NATO, US)
• Sim-Lab Concepts
• Support to Industry and science
• Right minors program, rebuilding the Industry
  SSSO Panel

9
Proposed New ADSO
Currently a service oriented structure. Army,
Navy, AF, Joint and CD posns. Intent - Move to
an output based focus. Capability, Governance,
Corporate
10
Fire

• What does defence need from industry ?
• Your hearts and minds
• Your role in whole of nation defence
• Engage collaboratively, early in requirements
  exploration
• Provide suitable products to support decision
  making for
• Employing the force - training, operations,
  mission rehearsal etc
• Developing the force - capability life cycle
• Coherence

11
Industries role within Capability
Future?
Current
12
Water

• What does industry expect of defence ?
• Vision, plan, clarity of needs
• Chance to orient themselves to apply hard-won
  resources effectively to defences questions
• Stronger simulation role across the spectrum of
  defence activities
• Coherence and sustained opportunities
• (I will be taking notes today)

13
Summary

• ADSO internet website for industrial access by
  Sep 06
• Roadmap by Nov 06
• Industrial Sim centre workshop (QL) by Aug 06
• Networking of Defence Sim training capabilities
  is in plan.
• Simulation role within DCP being clarified within
  Defence.
• Stronger industrial voice in collaborating and
  shaping defence simulation.