Title: Do small systems equilibrate chemically?
1Do small systems equilibrate chemically?
- Ingrid Kraus
- TU Darmstadt
2Outline
- Introduction to the Statistical Model
- Ensembles, partition function
- Grand canonical ensemble
- Comparison to data
- Extrapolation and predictions for heavy-ion
collisions at LHC - Experimental observables for T and µB
determination - Relevance of resonances
- From PbPb to pp system size and energy
dependence - Canonical suppression
- Concept of equilibrated clusters
- Comparison to data
- Summary
3Statistical Ensembles
- Micro-canonical
- closed system
- E, V, N fix
- Canonical
- heat bath
- T, V, N fix
- Grand-canonical
- open system
- heat bath and particle reservoir
- T, V, m fix
E, V, N
Laplace transformation
SE
SN
4Partition function and its derivations
- Partition function of a grand canonical ensemble
- Energy density Entropy density
- Particle number density Pressure
- Grand-canonical partition function
- i species in the system
- Mesons m lt 1.5 GeV, Baryons m lt 2 GeV
5Partition function and model parameters
- Partition function for species i with degenaracy
factor gi - with
- () for fermions, (-) for bosons
- Model parameters
- T and mB mS constrained by strangeness
neutrality - V cancels in ratios mQ constrained by charge of
nuclei
6Comparison to Experimental Data
A.Andonic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel,
nucl-th/0511071
- Accurancy in T, mB few MeV
- Different data selected for fits
7T - mB systematics, extrapolation to LHC
Chemical decoupling conditions extracted from SIS
up to RHIC Feature common behavior On the
freeze-out curve TLHC TRHIC 170 MeV T TC
170 MeV µB from parametrised freeze-out curve
µB (v(sNN) 5.5TeV) 1 MeV Nucl. Phys. A 697
(2002) 902 Grand canonical ensemble for PbPb
predictions
hep-ph/0511094
8Predictions for PbPb
- Reliable for stable particles
- Benchmark for resonances
- Errors
- T 170 /- 5 MeV
- µB 1 4 MeV
-
- 1
All calculations with THERMUS hep-ph/0407174
9Extraction of thermal parameters from data
_
- determine µB from p/p
- sensitivity on T
- increases with mass difference
- decay contribution affect lighter particles
stronger - increasing feed-down with increasing T
- decay dilutes T dependence
- T from W / p and/or W / K
10Resonance Decays
- Hadron Resonance gas
- W no resonance contribution
- X
- 50 from feed-down
- both exhibit same T dependence
- K decay exceeds thermal at LHC
- p
- thermal production constant
- resonance contribution dominant
- 75 of all p from resonances
11Canonical suppression
- Grand canonical ensemble
- large systems, large number of produced hadrons
- Canonical ensemble
- small systems / peripheral collisions, low
energies - suppressed phase-space for particles related to
conserved charges - density of particle i with strangeness S
approxiamtely - S order of Bessel functions
- x sum over strange hadrons, related to volume
- Volume enters as additional parameter V
- here radius R of spherical volume V
12Canonical suppression
- Stronger suppression for multi-strange hadrons
- Suppression depends on strangeness content, not
difference - (expected from gS)
13Suppression by undersatured phase-space
- Stronger suppression for multi-strange hadrons
- Suppression depends on difference of strangeness
content - (power of gS)
14Suppression in small systems
- Suppressed strangeness production beyond
canonical suppression - addressed by canonical treatment and
undersaturation factor gS - new equilibrated clusters
SPS v(sNN) 17 AGeV
15Modification of the model
- Statistical Model approach T and µB
- Volume for yields ? radius R used here
- Deviations strangeness undersaturation factor gS
- Fit parameter
- Alternative small clusters (RC) in fireball (R)
RC R - Chemical equilibrium in subvolumes canonical
suppression - RC free parameter
R
RC
16Fit Example
- All Fits were performed with THERMUS hep-ph/040
7174 - Fits with gS / RC give better description of data
17System size and energy dependence of T and mB
- T independent of
- System size
- Data selection
- Energy
18System size and energy dependence of the cluster
size
- Small clusters in all systems
- Small system size dependence
- pp
- energy dependence?
- PbPb
- depends on data selection (multistrange hadrons
needed)
19System size and energy dependence of the cluster
size
- AA clusters smaller than fireball
- RC not well defined for RC 2 fm because
suppression vanishes
20Canonical Suppression
- Particle ratios saturate at RC 2 - 3 fm
- no precise determination for small strangeness
suppression
21Summary
- Canonical ensemble
- volume dependend suppression
- stronger suppression modeled with smaller,
thermally equilibrated clusters - successful description of pp, CC, SiSi data
- strangeness production in small systems
reproduced with equilibrated subvolumes - Outlook
- strangeness production in pp at LHC
- Grand canonical ensemble
- successful description of AuAu, PbPb data
- extrapolations allow for predictions
- determination of thermal parameters with few
particle ratios - proper treatment of resonances is mandatory
22Going into formulas
- performing the momentum integration
- () for bosons, (-) for fermions
- mi mass of hadron i
- Particle number density
23Density and Ratios
- Approx. modified Bessel function
- Particle ratio
- Antiparticle/Particle ratio
24System size dependence of T and mB
- µB decreases at mid-rapidity in small systems .
- . as expected from increasing antibaryon /
baryon ratio
25System size dependence of the cluster size
26More SPS and RHIC 200 GeV Data
27Model setting with gS
- gS
- sensitive on data sample
- increase with size
- increase with energy
28Extrapolation to LHC
- does strangeness in pp at LHC behave grand
canonical ? - multiplicity increases with v(sNN)
- canonical and grand canon. event classes?
- plot from PPR Vol I
29Prediction for pp
- significant increase of ratios at RC 1.5 fm
- K / p and W / X behave differently
- multistrange hadrons suffer stronger suppression
- RC will be determined with ALICE data