Do small systems equilibrate chemically? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Do small systems equilibrate chemically?

Description:

heat bath and particle reservoir. T, V, m fix. Statistical Ensembles. E, V, N. T, V, N ... Suppressed strangeness production beyond canonical suppression ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Ingrid110
Learn more at: https://hq2006.bnl.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Do small systems equilibrate chemically?


1
Do small systems equilibrate chemically?
  • Ingrid Kraus
  • TU Darmstadt

2
Outline
  • Introduction to the Statistical Model
  • Ensembles, partition function
  • Grand canonical ensemble
  • Comparison to data
  • Extrapolation and predictions for heavy-ion
    collisions at LHC
  • Experimental observables for T and µB
    determination
  • Relevance of resonances
  • From PbPb to pp system size and energy
    dependence
  • Canonical suppression
  • Concept of equilibrated clusters
  • Comparison to data
  • Summary

3
Statistical Ensembles
  • Micro-canonical
  • closed system
  • E, V, N fix
  • Canonical
  • heat bath
  • T, V, N fix
  • Grand-canonical
  • open system
  • heat bath and particle reservoir
  • T, V, m fix

E, V, N
Laplace transformation
SE
SN
4
Partition function and its derivations
  • Partition function of a grand canonical ensemble
  • Energy density Entropy density
  • Particle number density Pressure
  • Grand-canonical partition function
  • i species in the system
  • Mesons m lt 1.5 GeV, Baryons m lt 2 GeV

5
Partition function and model parameters
  • Partition function for species i with degenaracy
    factor gi
  • with
  • () for fermions, (-) for bosons
  • Model parameters
  • T and mB mS constrained by strangeness
    neutrality
  • V cancels in ratios mQ constrained by charge of
    nuclei

6
Comparison to Experimental Data
A.Andonic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel,
nucl-th/0511071
  • Accurancy in T, mB few MeV
  • Different data selected for fits

7
T - mB systematics, extrapolation to LHC
Chemical decoupling conditions extracted from SIS
up to RHIC Feature common behavior On the
freeze-out curve TLHC TRHIC 170 MeV T TC
170 MeV µB from parametrised freeze-out curve
µB (v(sNN) 5.5TeV) 1 MeV Nucl. Phys. A 697
(2002) 902 Grand canonical ensemble for PbPb
predictions
hep-ph/0511094
8
Predictions for PbPb
  • Reliable for stable particles
  • Benchmark for resonances
  • Errors
  • T 170 /- 5 MeV
  • µB 1 4 MeV

- 1
All calculations with THERMUS hep-ph/0407174
9
Extraction of thermal parameters from data
_
  • determine µB from p/p
  • sensitivity on T
  • increases with mass difference
  • decay contribution affect lighter particles
    stronger
  • increasing feed-down with increasing T
  • decay dilutes T dependence
  • T from W / p and/or W / K

10
Resonance Decays
  • Hadron Resonance gas
  • W no resonance contribution
  • X
  • 50 from feed-down
  • both exhibit same T dependence
  • K decay exceeds thermal at LHC
  • p
  • thermal production constant
  • resonance contribution dominant
  • 75 of all p from resonances

11
Canonical suppression
  • Grand canonical ensemble
  • large systems, large number of produced hadrons
  • Canonical ensemble
  • small systems / peripheral collisions, low
    energies
  • suppressed phase-space for particles related to
    conserved charges
  • density of particle i with strangeness S
    approxiamtely
  • S order of Bessel functions
  • x sum over strange hadrons, related to volume
  • Volume enters as additional parameter V
  • here radius R of spherical volume V

12
Canonical suppression
  • Stronger suppression for multi-strange hadrons
  • Suppression depends on strangeness content, not
    difference
  • (expected from gS)

13
Suppression by undersatured phase-space
  • Stronger suppression for multi-strange hadrons
  • Suppression depends on difference of strangeness
    content
  • (power of gS)

14
Suppression in small systems
  • Suppressed strangeness production beyond
    canonical suppression
  • addressed by canonical treatment and
    undersaturation factor gS
  • new equilibrated clusters

SPS v(sNN) 17 AGeV
15
Modification of the model
  • Statistical Model approach T and µB
  • Volume for yields ? radius R used here
  • Deviations strangeness undersaturation factor gS
  • Fit parameter
  • Alternative small clusters (RC) in fireball (R)
    RC R
  • Chemical equilibrium in subvolumes canonical
    suppression
  • RC free parameter

R
RC
16
Fit Example
  • All Fits were performed with THERMUS hep-ph/040
    7174
  • Fits with gS / RC give better description of data

17
System size and energy dependence of T and mB
  • T independent of
  • System size
  • Data selection
  • Energy
  • µB smaller at RHIC

18
System size and energy dependence of the cluster
size
  • Small clusters in all systems
  • Small system size dependence
  • pp
  • energy dependence?
  • PbPb
  • depends on data selection (multistrange hadrons
    needed)

19
System size and energy dependence of the cluster
size
  • AA clusters smaller than fireball
  • RC not well defined for RC 2 fm because
    suppression vanishes

20
Canonical Suppression
  • Particle ratios saturate at RC 2 - 3 fm
  • no precise determination for small strangeness
    suppression

21
Summary
  • Canonical ensemble
  • volume dependend suppression
  • stronger suppression modeled with smaller,
    thermally equilibrated clusters
  • successful description of pp, CC, SiSi data
  • strangeness production in small systems
    reproduced with equilibrated subvolumes
  • Outlook
  • strangeness production in pp at LHC
  • Grand canonical ensemble
  • successful description of AuAu, PbPb data
  • extrapolations allow for predictions
  • determination of thermal parameters with few
    particle ratios
  • proper treatment of resonances is mandatory

22
Going into formulas
  • performing the momentum integration
  • () for bosons, (-) for fermions
  • mi mass of hadron i
  • Particle number density

23
Density and Ratios
  • Approx. modified Bessel function
  • Particle ratio
  • Antiparticle/Particle ratio

24
System size dependence of T and mB
  • µB decreases at mid-rapidity in small systems .
  • . as expected from increasing antibaryon /
    baryon ratio

25
System size dependence of the cluster size
  • Same trend as K / p

26
More SPS and RHIC 200 GeV Data
27
Model setting with gS
  • gS
  • sensitive on data sample
  • increase with size
  • increase with energy

28
Extrapolation to LHC
  • does strangeness in pp at LHC behave grand
    canonical ?
  • multiplicity increases with v(sNN)
  • canonical and grand canon. event classes?
  • plot from PPR Vol I

29
Prediction for pp
  • significant increase of ratios at RC 1.5 fm
  • K / p and W / X behave differently
  • multistrange hadrons suffer stronger suppression
  • RC will be determined with ALICE data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com