Individual Member Contributions to Achieving MCC Priorities

1
Individual Member Contributions to Achieving MCC
Priorities

• Evaluating Progress of MCCI Implementation

2
Michigan in a Leadership Role

• ...with regard to comprehensive cancer control
  evaluation
• --We need to develop meaningful evaluation
  measures that enhance accountability
• --We need consensus around critical attributes
  of success
• --We need a mechanism to track annual progress,
  and to provide members with tools to define and
  assess their contributions

3
Rationale for Assessment and Evaluation

• Were collecting multiple data components at the
  state level and by priority
• We have had a mechanism in place to collect data
  on an annual basis
• We need to evolve these data components to
  approach a link between members collective
  efforts and state-level outcomes
• We need to identify best practices

4
Multiple Uses for Data

• Assess member commitments/ gaps in implementation
  of critical activities
• Document member contributions and major
  accomplishments
• Annual reports can be viable advocacy tools.
  Enhance visibility and give credit
• Increase accountability to funders

5
Eight Categories of MCC Membership

• Health Care Insurance Plans
• H-Care/Primary Care Systems w/cancer prgs
• Health Education/H-Research Evaluation
• Organizations Representing Special Pops
• Univ -Based H-Care Systems w/cancer prgs
• Community-Based Systems w/cancer prgs
• Local Public Health Organizations
• Trade Professional Organizations

6
MCC Ad-Hoc Evaluation Committee

• John Ruckdeschel KCI, University-Based H-System
  w/ca prg
• Patrick Salow Ingham,1oCare H-System w/ca prg
• Marie Beisel MPRO, H-Research/Evaluation
• Paula Lantz UM-SPH, H-Research/Evaluation
• Bala Pai HAPMAHP, H-Insurance Plan Trade/Prof.
  Assoc.
• Huda Fadel BCBS, H-Care Insurance Plan
• Noel Pingatore ITC, Special Populations
• Deborah Oakley Healthy Asian, Special Pop
• Jamie Picken Oakland County, Local Public
  Health
• Lesley Duffner ACS, Trade/Prof. Assoc
• Steven Mandell MI Soc. Pathologists, Trade/Prof.
  Assoc.
• Donna Handley St John, Community-Based H-System
  w/ca prg
• MPHI Staff May Yassine, Chris Fussman, Beth
  Trierweiler

7
Review of Strategic Plans by Priority

• Early Detection Breast, Cervical, Colorectal
• Tobacco Use Reduction Adult, Youth
• Prostate Cancer
• End of Life Care
• Cancer Clinical Trials

8
Development of Metrics/Indicators of Progress by
Strategies Within Each Plan

• Focused on measurable strategies
• Considered achievability of proposed strategy
• Considered applicability of proposed strategy to
  each member category
• Considered strategies as written (verbatim)

9
Examples Turn to Handouts

• Metrics by Plan /Linked to Individual Strategies
• List of Indicators to track by Member Category

10
Thoughts

• Advisory committees are encouraged to write plan
  in specific, attainable, and measurable manner to
  enhance success
• Members commitment to reporting and completing
  data collection tools is crucial for success of
  evaluation effort
• Evaluation process is dynamic and adaptable to
  evolution of the program

11
Next Steps / Timeline

• Design data collection tool in progress
• Pilot test tool at key organizations October
• Committee to review finalize (early Nov
• Present Final plan to Board Nov 16
• Disseminate late Nov
• Data requested by January 30, 2006
• First data report to Board spring 06