Technological Progress and Growth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Technological Progress and Growth

Description:

The table illustrates three main facts: ... France. 1.6. 1.8. 2.3. Germany. 1.4. 2.2. 2.9. Japan. 1.5. 2.0. 3.0. United Kingdom. 2.3. 2.0. 2.3 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: arbo1
Learn more at: http://www2.hawaii.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technological Progress and Growth


1
TechnologicalProgress andGrowth
2
Technological Progressand the Rate of Growth
  • Technological progress has many dimensions. It
    may mean
  • Larger quantities of output
  • Better products
  • New products
  • A larger variety of products
  • Technological progress leads to increases in
    output for given amounts of capital and labor.

3
Technological Progressand the Production Function
  • Lets denote the state of technology by A and
    rewrite the production function as
  • A more restrictive but more convenient form is
  • Output depends on both capital and labor, and on
    the state of technology.

4
Technological Progressand the Production Function
  • Technological progress reduces the number of
    workers needed to achieve a given amount of
    output.
  • Technological progress increases AN, which we can
    define as the amount of effective labor in the
    economy.
  • With constant returns to scale,

5
Technological Progressand the Production Function
  • As in the previous framework, the relation
    between output per effective worker and capital
    per effective worker is

6
Technological Progressand the Production Function
  • Output per Effective Worker Versus Capital per
    Effective Worker

7
Assumptions
  • We now relax the two assumptions we used before
    (in Chapter 11)
  • The number of workers (the population) is growing
    at a constant (exogenous) rate.
  • Technology is improving at a constant (exogenous)
    rate.

8
Interactions BetweenOutput and Capital In a
Steady State
  • The amount of investment per effective worker
    needed to maintain a constant level of capital
    per effective worker is

As before, in the steady state, this expression
will equal investment (per effective worker)
9
Interactions BetweenOutput and Capital
  • Dynamics of Capital per Worker and Output per
    Effective Worker

10
Dynamics of Capital and Output
  • In the steady state
  • Output per effective worker is constant.
  • Output per worker grows at a rate (gA).
  • Output growth equals (gAgN).
  • The growth rate of output in the steady state is
    independent of the saving rate.
  • Capital and effective labor also grows at a rate
    equal to (gAgN).
  • Because output, capital, and effective labor all
    grow at the same rate, (gAgN), the steady state
    of the economy is also called a state of balanced
    growth.

11
Dynamics of Capital and Output
The Characteristics of the Steady State The Characteristics of the Steady State The Characteristics of the Steady State The Characteristics of the Steady State The Characteristics of the Steady State
Rate of growth of Chap. 12 Chap. 11 Chap. 11
1 Capital per effective worker 0 0
2 Output per effective worker 0 0
3 Capital per worker gA gA 0
4 Output per worker gA gA 0
5 Labor gN gN 0
6 Capital gA gN gA gN 0
7 Output gA gN gA gN 0
12
The Determinants of Technological Progress
  • Technological progress in modern economies is the
    result of research and development (RD)
    activities.
  • Private spending on RD depends on
  • The fertility of the research process, or how
    spending on RD translates into new ideas and new
    products, and
  • The appropriability of research results, or the
    extent to which firms benefit from the results of
    their own RD.

13
The Fertility of Research
  • The determinants of fertility include
  • The interaction between basic research and
    applied research.
  • The institutional environment education levels,
    firms characteristics, legal frameworks, etc.
  • Time It might take many years for the full
    potential of major discoveries to be realized.

14
The Appropriability of Research Results
  • If firms cannot appropriate the profits from the
    development of new products, they will not engage
    in RD.
  • Factors at work include
  • The nature of the research process. Is there a
    payoff in being first?
  • Legal protection. Patents give a firm that has
    discovered a new product the right to exclude
    anyone else from the production or use of the new
    product for a period of time.

15
Capital Accumulation Versus Technological Progress
Average Annual Rates of Growth of Output per Capita and of Technological Progress Average Annual Rates of Growth of Output per Capita and of Technological Progress Average Annual Rates of Growth of Output per Capita and of Technological Progress Average Annual Rates of Growth of Output per Capita and of Technological Progress Average Annual Rates of Growth of Output per Capita and of Technological Progress Average Annual Rates of Growth of Output per Capita and of Technological Progress Average Annual Rates of Growth of Output per Capita and of Technological Progress
Growth of Output per Capita Growth of Output per Capita Growth of Output per Capita Rate of Technological Progress Rate of Technological Progress Rate of Technological Progress
1950-73(1) 1973-87(2) Change(3) 1950-73(4) 1973-87(5) Change(6)
France 4.0 1.8 ?2.2 4.9 2.3 ?2.6
Germany 4.9 2.1 ?2.8 5.6 1.9 ?3.7
Japan 8.0 3.1 ?4.9 6.4 1.7 ?4.7
United Kingdom 2.5 1.8 ?0.7 2.3 1.7 ?0.6
United States 2.2 1.6 ?0.6 2.6 0.6 ?2.0
16
Capital Accumulation Versus Technological Progress
  • The table illustrates three main facts
  • The earlier period of high growth of output per
    capita was due to rapid technological progress.
  • The slowdown in growth of output per capita since
    1973 has come from a decrease in the rate of
    technological progress.
  • Convergence of output per capita across the rich
    countries has come from higher technological
    progress rather than from faster capital
    accumulation.

17
Why Did Technological ProgressSlow Down in the
mid-1970s?
Spending on RD as a Percentage of GDP Spending on RD as a Percentage of GDP Spending on RD as a Percentage of GDP Spending on RD as a Percentage of GDP
1963 1975 1989
France 1.6 1.8 2.3
Germany 1.4 2.2 2.9
Japan 1.5 2.0 3.0
United Kingdom 2.3 2.0 2.3
United States 2.7 2.3 2.8
18
TFP Growth
19
Science Education
20
Epilogue
  • We still cannot explain well enough why some
    countries grow more than others.
  • There seem to be many different reasons for the
    vastly different growth performances across
    countries (and to a lesser extent across time).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com