Update of high speed networking in Hungary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Update of high speed networking in Hungary

Description:

Traditional peering with ISPs in Hungary via the Budapest Internet Exchange (BIX) only ... five providers 3 routes. Telcos handle DF as an asset ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: tete8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Update of high speed networking in Hungary


1
Update of high speed networking in Hungary
  • István Tétényi, Hungarnet/NIIF, Hungary
  • E-mail tetenyi_at_sztaki.hu

2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • NGN-Hungarnet (infrastructure only)
  • CEF in Hungary
  • CEF in .cz-.hu
  • Conclusions

This is not a technical presentation!
3
Background
  • Representing the Hungarian research networking
    community Hungarnet/NIIF
  • Hungarnet has got 19 years of history
  • Serving 700 institutions and 600 000 users
  • Personal involvement in Pan European research
    networking projects

4
The seven ages of networking(a well-known story)
  • stages/acts
  • analogue circuits
  • X.25
  • managed leased digital circuit
  • ATM
  • SDH
  • leased lambda
  • dark fiber based switched lambda network (CEF)

All the world's a stage, And all the men and
women merely players (William
Shakespeare - As You Like It )
5
NGN-Hungarnet Evolution of high speed networking
(1)
  • Yearly average growth
  • Budapest 223
  • country side 193

6
NGN-Hungarnet Evolution of high speed
networking(2)
  • Yearly average growth
  • Budapest - 244
  • country - 273



7
NGN-Hungarnet10G usage trends (1)
8
NGN-Hungarnet10G usage trends (2)
Nr. of months traffic to double 21 Trunk
capacity growth is yearly 250
9
NGN-HungarnetChange of peering policy
  • Traditional peering with ISPs in Hungary via the
    Budapest Internet Exchange (BIX) only
  • Problems
  • capacity, resiliency, mean time to repair
  • Solutions
  • Capacity upgrade with BIX to 10GE
  • Direct peering with big ISPs and back-up via BIX
  • Dark fiber (longer distance), GE used, planned
    10GE
  • Aggregated peering capacity 17Gbps

10
CEF in HungaryDF experience
  • Nr of DF connections 38
  • Total length 410km
  • Inter city 10
  • Within city 90
  • Just as good as managed services

11
CEF in HungaryViability
  • Telco/market view
  • (updated)
  • telecommunication companies is limited
  • investors do not invest in the telco segment
  • dramatically decreasing profit in traditional
    voice
  • telecommunication market shrink is being
    compensated by broadband and mobile voice
  • Telcos focus is broadband ADSL or WiMax (quick
    ROI)
  • competition is very limited for nation-wide
    high-speed services
  • CapEx is scarce
  • Research network view (updated)
  • Hungarnet budget is not improving
  • government support is uncertain
  • higher prices for high speed services
  • experience with long range dark fiber is limited
  • reliability is an issue
  • Is CEF viable countrywide?

12
CEF in HungaryPossibilities
  • Limited availability of dark fiber for
    inter-city routes
  • single provider - 11 -routes,
  • dual-providers - 14 routes,
  • three providers 9 routes lack of competition
  • four providers 4 routes
  • five providers 3 routes
  • Telcos handle DF as an asset
  • Lack of interest in investing local fiber-loop
  • Not much interest in selling pure infrastructure
  • IRU is not an option
  • Situation is not going to change soon
  • EU structural funds from 2007
  • Hungarian broadband strategy might include FTTx
    targets
  • Conclusion limited possibilities

13
CEF in HungaryPlans in 2005
  • New public procurement
  • Lease expires in November 2005
  • 23 SDH connections 34/155Mbps
  • 15 DF connections in Budapest
  • Target
  • Min managed GE country side, DF in Budapest
  • Max DF everywhere
  • Realistic passive WDM countryside, DF in
    Budapest
  • Constrains
  • capacity upgrade is a must
  • development cap-ex is nil in 2005
  • budget limit is very tight
  • longer term financial commitments need special
    authorization for NREN
  • lack of competition
  • Conclusion great challenge

14
CEF in .cz vs. .hu
  • CESNET financial figures 2003 TF-NGN meeting in
    Cambridge
  • Both NRENs aim is to optimize price/performance
  • Hungarnet chose a mixed route due to the
    attractive pricing
  • CESNET approach is mainstream
  • Hungarnet approach is down-to-earth

15
Conclusions
  • Hungarnet network is continuously growing
  • Nation-wide CEF availability is uncertain
  • Cross-border circuit soon with AMREJ
  • Difficult public procurement in 2005
  • GEANT2 services open new options
  • More government support required to keep rate of
    development
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com