Title: Student research behavior
1Student research behavior prototype application
From research conducted at the University of
Maryland, 2005-2006
- Computers in Libraries, March 2009
- Dan Wendling, MLS, Neal Kaske, PhD
- wendlingd_at_acm.org
- http//ponder-matic.com
2How do students use Google in their last
course-related search for information? (n544
2005-06)
When
Who
How
3How do students use UMDs ResearchPort in their
last course-related search? (n544 2005-06)
(ResearchPort is the University of Maryland
Libraries gateway to licensed content.)
4Comparison of who used Google and ResearchPort in
course-related searching (n544)
5Comparison of when Google and ResearchPort were
accessed in course-related searching (n544)
6This presentation
- How should we describe information-seeking
behavior? Project research questions /
methodology - Demonstration of the application prototype at
http//www.ponder-matic.com - Results, conclusions, next steps
7Foudy, Johnson, Kaske 2005 research questions
- What are contemporary university students
information-seeking behaviors and what role(s),
if any, do libraries and/or librarians play in
these behaviors? - What are contemporary students mental models of
the tasks performed by librarians? - Do these behaviors or mental models differ
according to level of matriculation, from
freshmen through graduate students?
8Basic Research Design Methodology Mixed Method
Approach, 2005-2006
- Individual interviews with 544 students
- (N544 256 288)
- On campus
- Not in, not near a library
- Sampling convenience
- Critical incident reporting
- Run one week in April 2005 and one week in
November 2006
- Focus group interviews with 110 students
- (N12 110 participants)
- 3 groups each for
- Freshmen
- Sophomores
- Juniors Seniors
- Graduate students
9Individual Interview Form (page 1 of 2)
(Reproduced in your conference book and on our
web site.)
10Project coding sheet, version 9
(See conference book or web site for version 10.)
11Model How students move through information space
12Anatomy of one session, a ResearchPort search
13Demo of the prototype at http//www.ponder-matic.c
om
14What makes projects like this work
- Selected bullets from the book Competing on
Analytics, by Davenport and Harris, Signposts of
effective IT - Information workers spend their time analyzing
data and understanding its implications rather
than collecting and formatting data. - Managers focus on improving processes and
business performance, not culling data. - A hypothesis can be quickly analyzed and tested
without a lot of manual behind-the-scenes
preparation beforehand. - Analysts have direct, nearly instantaneous access
to data.
15Where to go for more background
- Your conference book
- LOEX Library Instruction Conference Procedings
2006 Is Google God? How do students look for
information today? (description) - Paper for ARLs 2008 Library Assessment
Conference, Student research behavior
Quantitative and qualitative research findings
presented with visualizations.
16Key influences
- Competing on Analytics, a business book by Tom
Davenport and Jeanne Harris - A good Google
- Also the podcast Competing on Analytics by
Jeanne Harris - A presentation on information visualization by
Ben Shneiderman - The ideas about the importance of assessing
libraries locally - Our bibliography has more information
17Acknowledgements
- University of Maryland students of the College of
Information Studies, LBSC 713 Planning
Evaluating Library Services, two classes - Spring semester 2005
- Fall semester 2006
- Initial project funding from the University of
Maryland Libraries
18Contact Information
- Web site http//www.ponder-matic.com
- Dan Wendling, MLS wendlingd_at_acm.org
- Neal K. Kaske, PhD nkaske_at_noaa.gov
-
- The contents of this presentation reflect the
views of the authors who are responsible for the
opinions, facts, and the accuracy of the data
presented. The contents do not necessarily
reflect the official views or policies of the
authors employers or of the University of
Maryland Libraries.
19Questions?