Title: Unification Feasibility Study
1Unification Feasibility Study
- Coarsegold Union School District (CUSD) and
Yosemite Joint Union High School District
(YJUHSD) - Petition to unify to be executed by majority vote
of both governing boards is being contemplated - If approved, the petition starts a process that,
if State approved, would result in a local
election - In the meantime, there is a 2-3 year process of
review by the county and state to ensure the
proposal is educationally and fiscally sound - Nigro Nigro White, LLP (NNW) was engaged to
assist the governing boards in making an informed
decision by conducting a feasibility study
2Study Background
- CUSD serves 1,037 pupils grade K-8
- YJUHSD serves 1,358 pupils grade 9-12 from 3
feeder elementary schools - The proposed unified school district would serve
approximately 2,395 pupils in grades K-12 - As permitted by EC 35542(b), Bass Lake and
Raymond-Knowles would remain independent K-8
school districts - A resolution must be passed by Bass Lake and
Raymond-Knowles in order to remain independent
3Study Scope and Methodology
- NNW evaluated whether the States Nine Criteria
for unification are substantially met and
computed the estimated revenue limit for the
proposed unified district - NNW toured the study area, interviewed districts
staff, gather districts data and attended a joint
governing board meeting - Statewide published statistical measurements
were used in the educational, facilities and
fiscal analyses
4Evaluation of the States Nine Criteria
- The States nine criteria all were readily and
substantially met - District size greater than 1,500 pupils
- Community identity
- Equitable division of property, funds and
obligations - Not promote racial/ethnic discrimination/segregati
on - No significant increased costs to the State
- Not disrupt educational programs and continue to
promote a sound educational program - No significant increase in school housing costs
- Not designed to increase property values
- No substantial negative fiscal effects on either
district -
5Additional Questions Addressed
- In addition to the States criteria, there were
questions of local interest that NNW has
researched and included in the study. - How much new money should the unified district
receive from the State? - How much of the new money might be spent on
leveling up salary and benefit schedule? - Will there be any money left over for program
expansion? - Will necessary small school funding eligibility
be lost? - Will administrative efficiencies be achieved and
could this result in staff layoffs? - How would a Chawanakee High School affect the
proposed unified school district? - Will Coarsegolds bonded indebtedness affect Bass
Lake or Raymond-Knowles? - How might the new unified governing board be
elected and organized?
6How much new money should the unified
district receive from the State?
- EC 35735 specifies how the newly unified school
districts State funded revenue limit is to be
computed - The computation is based using actual salary,
benefit and FTE data from the 2nd prior fiscal
year from the effective unification date (e.g.,
2003-04 for a July 1, 2005 unification date) - But the data is readily estimatible and is not
expected to materially change - There are two parts to the computation
- Blending of the two districts revenue limit,
this is revenue neutral - New money from the districts average difference
in salaries and benefits
7How much new money should the unified
district receive from the State?
- The first part of the calculation yields 5,052
per ADA and is revenue neutral - The second part, the new money, yields 505 per
ADA (or 1.1 million using current data) - The total unified revenue limit is estimated at
5,557 and is on-going - Compared to the statewide average for a unified
school district, 4,753, the Yosemite-Coarsegold
proposal yields 804 more per ADA
8How much of the new money might be spent on
leveling up salary and benefit schedule?
- There is no requirement to spend any but common
salary and benefits schedules must be negotiated
by the new unified governing board and each
employee group - Often pay is negotiated up to the best of both
schedules to promote equity and maintain employee
morale - If unified today, NNW estimates YJUHSD
certificated staff compensation would increase
45,000 and all CUSD groups would increase by a
total of 364,000
9Will there be any money left over for program
expansion?
- Yes. An estimated 691,000 would remain that
could be used for any purpose. For example - Reducing class sizes
- Hiring program specialist (e.g., reading)
- Expanding pupil services (e.g., nurses,
psychologists) - Differentiated programs for gifted, special need
and at-risk youths - Improved grounds, maintenance and custodial
services -
10Will necessary small school funding eligibility
be lost?
- Yes, if the unified school districts ADA exceeds
2,500 - Enrollment projections show the unified district
is not expected to reach 2,501 ADA until 2008-09
(at the earliest) - The net loss is estimated at 378,000 and would
occur several years after unification - Even with the loss, the unified school district
would still have a net fiscal positive after
leveling up salaries and benefits of over 300,000
11Will administrative efficiencies be achieved and
could this result in staff layoffs?
- Administrative efficiencies would be achieved due
to the reduction of duplicative reports and
processes - Staff layoffs are highly unlikely for three
reasons - Enrollment is expected to increase annually
- Classified staff have a two-year right to
employment and cannot be laid off during this
period - The two districts today are administratively
lean, 15 administrator FTEs compared to 26 FTEs
among comparative districts
12How would a Chawanakee High School affect the
proposed unified school district?
- Transfer of pupils from Yosemite High School to
the proposed Chawanakee High School would
actually be economically beneficial to the
proposed unified school district - A fiscal positive from the revenue limit results,
estimated at 100,000 - Loss of necessary small school funding is
postponed - Transportation savings are possible
- It is uncertain when and if Chawanakee High
School is to be built, the school district does
not currently have eligibility for State funding
and would have to raise taxes to fund construction
13Will Coarsegolds bonded indebtedness affect Bass
Lake or Raymond-Knowles?
- No. The California Department of Education and
the Districts legal counsel have asserted that
no reapportionment of debt would occur due to
unification - In other words, the Coarsegold residents would
continue to pay for the bonds the same as today - Future bond measures for the unified district
would need to specify the purpose of the bonds,
elementary versus high school, in order to match
the voting and tax areas to where the bonds are
to be used - As such, Bass Lake and Raymond-Knowles would not
be taxed without the benefit of using the funds
14How might the new unified governing board be
elected and organized?
- The Education Code permits a 5 or 7 member board
elected at-large or through trustee areas - Currently both district use trustee areas to
nominate candidates with the election held
at-large - There are pros and cons about the use of trustee
areas, past history may help guide the decision - The decision on board composition and method of
election can be made (and changed) at any time - If not specified before the unification, a 5
member board elected at-large would be
established (subject to change at any time) - Current board members may run for the new unified
board
15Recommendation tothe Governing Boards
- All of the States Nine Criteria for
unification are substantially met and there are
many benefits that would result from unification - Substantial financial benefits
- Higher salaries and benefits for many employees
- Added funds for educational program expansion
- Administrative efficiencies
- Bass Lake and Raymond-Knowles would remain
independent - There is no prohibition on subsequent unification
actions - Recommended Next Step
- Initiation of a petition to unify