U.S. ATLAS Computing Project: Budget Profiles.

1
U.S. ATLAS Computing Project Budget Profiles.

• Jim Shank
• Boston University
• DOE/NSF Review of LHC Computing
• LBNL
• 14-19 Jan., 2003

2
Budget Profile Overview

• What has happened since last review
• The Bare-Bones profile from last summer
• The construction project stretch-out
• The NSF MO/Computing proposal
• New profile estimates
• Profile of Success (POS)
• Guidance adjusted Profile (GAP)

3
Project Funded Core SW FTE
4
Current (FY03) Project Funded Manpower

• Core SW
• 4.5 FTE _at_ LBL
• 3 FTE _at_ ANL
• 4 FTE _at_ BNL
• Facilities (Tier 1 _at_ BNL)
• 4.5 FTE _at_ BNL

5
Bare Bones Budget from June 2002
6
Recent BCP (approved recently)
7
NSF MO/Computing proposal budget

Submitted Oct. 02
8
NSF proposal SW effort breakdown
9
Profile of Success (POS)

• What is needed for a leadership role in LHC

10
POS DOE
11
POS NSF
12
POS Computing breakdown

13
Computing POS
14
Guidance Adjusted Profile (GAP)

• Assuming the guidance from last month 1500 K
  less from DOE FY04, nominal guidance numbers from
  NSF.
• Distribute shortfall from POS 50-50 between MO
  and Computing
• Distribute resulting computing shortfall
  pro-rated between Facilities and Software
• Rationalize a bit re-distribute between
  Fac./SW so we are not hiring one year, then
  firing.
• Result GAP on next slide

15
GAP Computing Breakdown
16
GAP Profile

17
Profile comparison
18
Tier 1 Profile comparison
19
Summary

• Profile of Success
• Funds Core SW effort some university support
  including badly needed presence (3 FTE) at CERN
• Viable Facilities profile
• Guidance Adjusted Profile
• Serious shortfall in facilities
• Lose some University based sw FTEs
• If FY04 guidance numbers are wrong
• 25 less than guidance ? Profile of Death (POD)
• Will show in breakout session