Qualitative Studies: Case Studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Qualitative Studies: Case Studies

Description:

... tool to test hypotheses in an ex post facto manner ie when the researcher CAN NOT ... Case studies are therefore usually concerned with investigating how or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: keith145
Category:
Tags: case | ex | facto | post | qualitative | studies

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Qualitative Studies: Case Studies


1
Qualitative StudiesCase Studies
2
Introduction
  • In this presentation we will examine the use of
    case studies in testing research hypotheses
  • Validity
  • Quality
  • Analysis.

3
Case study methodology
  • Case studies are used as a research tool to test
    hypotheses in an ex post facto manner ie when the
    researcher CAN NOT control ANY of the variables
    under investigation.
  • Case studies are therefore usually concerned with
    investigating how or why events occurred.

4
Case study methodology
  • Case studies involve examining what has occurred
    to identify reasons for the occurrence.
  • The lack of control leads to a number of
    potential problems with case study based research
    which, if not controlled, can invalidate any
    conclusions drawn from the research.

5
Case study methodology
  • There are three typical criticisms of the case
    study methodology
  • Problems of bias
  • Lack of generalisability
  • They are only suitable for explanatory
    investigations.

6
Problems of bias
  • Many researchers are concerned with the apparent
    lack of rigour involved in case study research
    (as compared to experimental studies) bought
    about by investigator bias.
  • Relationships may appear simply because you are
    looking for them.

7
Generalisability
  • Because case studies allow no control over any of
    the variables many question whether conclusions
    drawn from one specific example can be applied
    generally.

8
Exploratory studies
  • Many argue that only experimental research can be
    used to establish causal relationships with case
    studies being limited in use to the explanatory
    stage of a research project.
  • This view misses the most important aspect of a
    case study, its holistic and real-life nature.

9
Design of a case study
  • Many of the concerns associated with the use of
    case studies can be minimised by careful design.
  • Validity is the most important issue to be
    addressed in the design of a case study
    methodology.

10
Concepts and indicators
  • Most research involves measuring concepts (eg
    intent).
  • Unfortunately concepts are normally abstract and
    thus not directly observable.
  • Thus indicators (variables) are specified which
    operationalise the concept.

11
Concepts and indicators
  • Unfortunately not all concepts can be easily
    operationalised and thus the validity of the
    indicator is drawn into question.
  • One way around this problem is to use multiple
    indicators each of which are a partial
    operationalisation of the concept.

12
Validity of indicators
  • The next question is how to evaluate the validity
    and reliability of the indicators does it
    measure what it is supposed to measure.

13
Validity of indicators
  • There are various types of validity
  • Face validity
  • Criterion validity
  • Construct validity
  • Internal validity
  • External validity.

14
Face validity
  • Face validity involves a subjective evaluation of
    the indicator using
  • Logic
  • Common sense
  • Previous reported studies
  • Jury/Expert opinion.

15
Criterion validity
  • Criterion validity uses a well established
    indicator to compare the performance of a newly
    defined indicator.
  • The new indicator behaves in a similar manner to
    the established one then validity is assumed.

16
Construct validity
  • Construct validity involves examining one
    indicator and its relationships to other presumed
    indicators of the same concept.
  • High correlation between the indicators implies
    they are valid measures of the concept.
  • Perfect correlation implies redundancy.

17
Construct validity
  • In case studies three strategies can be used to
    increase construct validity
  • multiple sources of evidence
  • chains of evidence
  • informants comments.

18
Internal validity
  • Internal validity examines the extent to which a
    research finding (eg A lead to B) is valid.
  • Internal validity involves eliminating all other
    relationships between other variables (eg C) and
    B.

19
Internal validity
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
20
Internal validity
Other possible Variables
X
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
21
Internal validity
  • There are numerous factors that can effect
    internal validity.
  • History/Maturity
  • a long time between observations can cause
    problems.
  • Testing
  • people behave differently under test conditions.

22
Internal validity
  • Selection
  • observed differences could be the result of
    differences within the group.
  • Mortality
  • systematic dropout from the study.

23
Internal validity in case studies
  • The nature of case studies require inferences to
    be made during data collection.
  • Is the inference correct?
  • Have all possibilities been considered?
  • Is the evidence convergent?
  • The overall quality depends on the quality of the
    investigator.

24
Internal validity in case studies
25
External validity
  • External validity is concerned with the
    applicability of the research results to other
    (non examined) populations.
  • Testing
  • attitudes may change as a result of the
    questioning and the sample thus be
    unrepresentative.

26
External validity
  • Sample selection
  • self-selecting samples could be biased - include
    details of those who refused to cooperate.
  • In case studies the use of multiple case studies
    usually satisfies the requirements for external
    validity

27
Reliability
  • Reliability is concerned with the reproducibility
    of measurements.
  • When attitudes are examined how do you know that
    each respondents ratings are the same?
  • Interview structure, telephone protocols,
    standard letters, rigour in data collection and
    pilot studies all help in improving reliability.

28
Analysing case study data
  • Each case study must be reported in detail
  • the visit
  • interviews
  • conversations
  • facts
  • evidence in support/rejection of hypotheses

29
Analysing case study data
  • conclusions
  • outstanding issues
  • further investigation
  • other case studies.
  • Across case studies
  • replication
  • rigourous thinking.

30
Summary
  • A good case study must be
  • Significant
  • Complete
  • Consider all perspectives
  • Display sufficient evidence
  • Compelling.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com