GAINESVILLE GOLF

1
CPA-02-08 Location Map
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
2
CPA-02-08 Aerial
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
3
CPA-02-08 Zoning Districts
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
4
CPA-02-08 Existing Future Land Use
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
5
CPA-02-08 Proposed Future Land Use
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
6
CPA-02-08 North Oblique Aerial
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
7
CPA-02-08 South Oblique Aerial
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
8
CPA-02-08 East Oblique Aerial
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
9
CPA-02-08 West Oblique Aerial
GAINESVILLE GOLF COUNTRY CLUB
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Chronology

• February 12, 2008 BoCC recommends transmittal
  of CPA-02-08 to the Department of Community
  Affairs (DCA)
• February 19, 2008 transmittal of all large
  scale CPAs in this cycle to DCA with relevant
  background materials
• March 6, 2008 DCA acknowledges receipt of
  materials and 60 day timeframe for review begins

15
Chronology

• May 5, 2008 DCA issues its Objections,
  Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report
• June 16, 2008 - Applicant response (Draft
  Development Agreement)
• June 20, 2008 - Preliminary E-Agenda deadline
• June 25, 2008 Final E-Agenda deadline

16
DCA ORC Report

• Three Objections
• Impacts to natural resources associated with
  Paynes Prairie
• Given the character of the amendment site and
  the density of the proposed future land use
  category, the County has not demonstrated the
  amendment will not negatively impact onsite
  natural resources as well as the wetlands and
  natural resources and wildlife associated with
  Paynes Prairie. Furthermore, the County has not
  included the resources management plan required
  by COSE Policy 3.4.1. Therefore, the amendment is
  not consistent with the natural resource
  protection requirements of Chapter 163, F.S.,
  Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. and with Alachua County
  Comprehensive Plan policies to protect natural
  resources including COSE Policies 3.4.1, 3.6.3,
  and 3.6.6.

17
DCA ORC Report

• Impacts to local roads including those which
  provide access to the project site
• The proposed amendment is internally
  inconsistent with the Alachua County
  Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Policy
  1.3.8.2 which requires development in the Medium
  Density Residential land use category have access
  to an arterial or collector roadway. The location
  of the amendment site, within the Gainesville
  Golf and County Club, does not have access to an
  arterial or collector roadway.

18
DCA ORC Report

• Inconsistency with State Comprehensive Plan
• The proposed plan amendment is not consistent
  with and does not further the following goals and
  policies of the State Comprehensive Plan (Section
  187.201, F.S.)
• (7) Water Resources, Goal (a) and Policies (b) 8
  10 (9) Natural Systems and Recreation Lands,
  Goal (a) and Policies (b)1, 7, 10 (15) Land
  Use, Goal (a) and Policies (b) 2 and 6 (21) The
  Economy. Goal (a) and Policy (b)3 and (25) Plan
  Implementation, Goal (a) and Policy (b)7.

19
Applicant Response

• On June 16, 2008, the applicants agent submitted
  a draft Development Agreement for review by
  staff. However, DCA has indicated that such an
  instrument is not appropriate to address the
  concerns raised in the ORC report. Rather, DCA
  finds that revisions should occur to the CPA
  itself. County staff support this finding

20
Staff Finding

• Staff finds that the proposed Development
  Agreement does not adequately address the
  objections raised in the ORC report or the
  concerns of County staff as stated in the first
  staff report. Issues related to environmental
  impacts have been only partially addressed while
  issues related to traffic and concurrency have
  been ignored

21
Staff Recommendation

• Based on the findings of the ORC report as well
  as previous findings by staff in its first staff
  report, staff recommends that CPA-02-08 not be
  adopted. County Staff has cited inconsistencies
  with the County Comprehensive Plan, most notably
  with numerous policies found in the Conservation
  and Open Space Element. Also cited are policies
  within the Future Land Use Element relating to
  vehicular access to the proposed site (FLUE
  Policies 1.3.8.2 and 1.5.2). As an alternate
  recommendation, the BoCC could direct the
  applicant to resubmit the request at an alternate
  location during the next large scale
  comprehensive plan cycle. The Growth Management
  Department anticipates that applications for this
  cycle will be accepted sometime in the fall of
  2008.