Title: Happy Earth Day ?
1Happy Earth Day ?
2First Earth Day
- Senator Gaylord Nelson (Wisconsin)
- Building on idea of anti-war rallies, decided to
hold teach-in about environment - April 22, 1970 estimated 20 million people (10
US population) participated
3Toxic Substances
4Love Canal
- Hooker Chemical Co. dumped tons of toxic waste
(PCBs, dioxin, benzene, lindane) in Niagara
Falls, NY - 1953 Hooker sold site to Niagara Falls School
Board for 1 and deed that absolved them of
liability - 1978 State disclosed site could be harmful
- 1,000 families affected, higher miscarriage rate,
many more birth defects - Lois Gibbs formed homeowners association,
national attention
5Love Canal--Impact
- 1978 President Carter declared LC federal
disaster area, cleanup began - Occidental Petroleum (bought Hooker) ultimately
paid over 200 million to state, federal
government and residents - Led to major federal legislation that gave EPA
authority to control hazardous waste
6Aftermath of Love Canal
- 1980 Comprehensive Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CRCLA), commonly known as
Superfund - Goal Identify hazardous waste sites and clean up
sites on a priority basis - Worst sites put on National Priorities List (NPL)
and scheduled for cleanup - Make responsible parties pay for cleanup when
possible - Initially 1.6 billion fund to identify and clean
up worst sites, tax on manufacturers of certain
organic chemicals and oil importers - 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) right to know policy - Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
Act provided for public release of information
about chemicals made by, stored in, and released
by businesses through Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI) - What happened?
- gt44,000 sites evaluated, by 2004 about 1,200
active NPL sites, and about 900 cleaned up and/or
removed - gt27 billion spent
- Depletion of trust fund under Bush Administration
in 2003, relies now on annual appropriations of
tax dollars and money recovered from companies
linked to sites
7Overview
- Milestones and extent of problem
- Factors that affect toxicity and classes of toxic
substances - How do we monitor impact of toxic substances?
- How do we regulate toxic substances?
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
8Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
9(No Transcript)
10The chemical revolution
- The number and amount of chemicals substances
sold commercially in the US has grown dramatically
11How widespread a problem?
- 35,000 chemicals used daily in US industry
- 500-1,000 new chemicals created annually
- 120,000 US establishments create and distribute
chemicals - lt7 proposed for manufacture EPA reviewed
- gt 20,700 pesticides used in US, and gt1.2 billion
lbs of pesticides produced annually, with gt890
active ingredients - EPA has prohibited or restricted manufacture of
more than 500 commercial chemicals, including
DDT, dioxin, asbestos, PCBs
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
12Are toxic substances unique?
- Many are valuable for agricultural, industrial,
or consumer products - We often dont have a good idea of the degree of
risk of these chemicals - Probability of injury may be small for any one
individual, but since even low levels of exposure
can be harmful, often a problem for many
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
13Toxicity response
- Type and amount of health damage
- Acute toxicity Immediate or rapid reaction
- Subtle (e.g., cough or headache from urban air
pollution) - Violent (e.g., convulsions induced from exposure
to certain pesticides) - Chronic toxicity Permanent or long-lasting
consequence - Examples Mesothelioma, rare form of cancer from
exposure to asbestos
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
14What factors affect toxicity?
- Dose Amount of a substance a person has
ingested, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin - Frequency and duration of exposure
- Biological reactivity of the chemical in question
- Age and health of person exposed
- Routs of exposure
- Inhalation (e.g., smoking, sitting in
traffic)--rapid - Ingestion (e.g., food, liquids)
- Dermal exposure (e.g., spilled on skin)typically
slow - How well a person can detoxify a substance
- Genetic makeup of a person
- Synergistic responses Response can be greater
than sum of individual chemicals
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
15Classes of toxic substances
- Much of our concern about toxic chemicals stem
from the long-term increased risk from - Mutagens
- Carcinogens
- Teratogens
- Immune and nervous system
- Endocrine system
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
16Mutagens
Classes of toxic substances ? Mutagens Carcinogens
Teratogens Immune nervous systems Endocrine
system
- Substances that can cause mutations in DNA.
Examples include - Chemicals (e.g., Benzene)
- Radiation (e.g., UV, high-energy radiation)
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
17Carcinogens
Classes of toxic substances Mutagens ?
Carcinogens Teratogens Immune nervous
systems Endocrine system
- Chemicals or ionizing radiation that cause or
promote cancer - In US, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women
will develop some form of cancer - In US, cancer kills about 560,000 people/year
- Worldwide, approximately 6 million people/year
- What is link between chemicals and cancer?
- We dont know exactly, but 1 study in US est.
8,000 cancer deaths from air pollution, 8,000
from food additives and industrial products, and
16,000 from occupational exposure - National Cancer Institute recognizes link between
some cancer deaths and environmental pollution - Very difficult to make direct link
- Often 10-40 years may elapse between initial
exposure and appearance of detectable symptoms
18Teratogens
Classes of toxic substances Mutagens Carcinogens ?
Teratogens Immune nervous systems Endocrine
system
- Birth defects are physical (structural),
biochemical, or functional abnormality - Examples include cleft palate, lack of limbs, or
spina bifida - Estimated 7-12 of all newborns in US have birth
defects - Agents that cause harm or birth defects to a
fetus or embryo called teratogens. Examples
include - Ethyl alcohol (low birth weight, developmental
problems) - Radiation
- Chemicals (e.g., Thalidomide)
- We do not know what percentage of birth defects
caused by chemicals in the environment
19Immune nervous systems
- Classes of toxic substances
- Mutagens
- Carcinogens
- Teratogens
- Immune nervous systems
- Endocrine system
- Immune System specialized cells and tissues that
protect body against disease and harmful
substances by forming antibodies that make agent
harmless - Examples Dioxins and arsenic
- Nervous system Brain, spinal chord, and
peripheral nerves - Example snake venom is a neurotoxin
- PCBs, mercury, and certain pesticides are examples
20Endocrine System
- Classes of toxic substances
- Mutagens
- Carcinogens
- Birth defects
- Immune nervous systems
- ? Endocrine system
- Complex network of glands that releases very
small amounts of hormones into the bloodstream of
humans and other vertebrate animals - Low doses of these messengers turn on and off
bodily systems that control sexual reproduction,
growth, development, learning ability, and
behavior - Examples Dioxins at high levels are
carcinogenic, at low levels may disrupt hormone
receptors - Pthalates Softening agents added to plastics
(e.g., IV bags, plastic milk jugs, pop bottles)
act as estrogens and may be partly responsible
for earlier onset of sexual maturity, affect male
reproductive health, and probable human carcinogen
21What do we know?
- National Academy of Science estimates
- Only bout 10 of 80,000 chemicals in commercial
use thoroughly screened for toxicity - Only 2 adequately tested to determine whether
they are mutagens, carcinogens, or teratogens - Even fewer tested for possible damage to nervous,
endocrine, and immune systems - Worst toxics are persistent, bioaccumulative,
toxic, and transport long distances
22How do we monitor the problem?
- Body burden data
- Human health indicators (epidemiological approach)
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
23Human health indicators
Source National Cancer
Institute
24How do we regulate toxic substances?
- More than 24 federal laws and a dozen federal
agencies are concerned with regulating the
manufacture, distribution, and disposal of toxic
substances - CAA and CWA deal primarily with by-products,
while toxic substances often relate to products
we use/need - CAA and CWA include special provisions regulating
toxic and other hazardous pollutants
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
25Examples of types of toxics regulation
- Classes of chemicals
- Mode of exposure
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
26Classes of chemicals
Types of toxic regulations ? Classes of
chemicals Mode of exposure Other toxic substances
- Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) (agricultural chemicals) - Requires producers to conduct extensive
toxicology tests in the laboratory and the field
before applying to produce and sell new
agricultural chemicals - Problem mandates testing for carcinogenicity,
but does not mandate that a chemical be tested
for some other significant risks, or synergistic
effects
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
27Mode of exposure
Types of toxic regulations Classes of chemicals ?
Mode of exposure Other toxic substances
- Occupational and Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
limits workplace exposure to unhealthy levels of
toxics and other dangerous substances
28Other toxic substances
Types of toxic regulations Classes of
chemicals Mode of exposure ? Other toxic
substances
- Toxic Substances and Control Act (TSCA) (1976)
- Catch all statutes regulates creation,
manufacture, distribution of toxic substances - In contrast to FIFRA, does NOT automatically
require producers to conduct extensive battery of
tests, so most TSCA chemicals have not undergone
broad testing - Producer must file pre-manufacture notification
(PMN) with EPA before import or manufacture
chemical not in currently in commercial use. EPA
can approve or restrict - EPA also can examine chemicals that were in
commercial use before law passed
29What regulatory options?
- Government can ban a substance, or permit
production and attempt to control exposure - Government needs to decide on appropriate
regulatory standard - Health-based approach
- Feasibility approach
- Use risk-benefit to regulate when risks outweigh
social benefits
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
30Health-based
- Regulatory approaches
- Health-based
- Feasibility
- Risk-benefit
- Proscribe all risks or significant risks
- Historic example of zero-risk approach is the
Delaney Clause in the Federal Food Drug and
Cosmetic Act (FFDC) - If food additive causes cancer in animals,
Delaney Clause prohibits the additives use - Critics say unrealistic to ban something if only
1 in billions chance of cancer - Defenders argue that most risks turn out to be
worse than originally thought and require
precautionary approach - Replaced in 1996 by Food Quality Protection Act
(which amended FIFRA and FFDCA)does not use
health-based approach, uses risk-based approach - Clean Air Act (NAAQs), Safe Drinking Water Act
(Maximum Contaminant Level Goals) are other
examples of health-based standards
31Feasibility statutes
- Regulatory approaches
- Health-based
- ? Feasibility
- Risk-benefit
- Reduce risk as technologically or economically
feasible - OSHA
- Congress requires agencies to reduce toxic health
risks, but only to the extent feasible - Major question is what feasible means
- Courts have ruled this means both economically
and technologically feasible - Other examples include Clean Water Act and Safe
Drinking Water Act (Maximum Containment Levels)
32Risk-Benefit Statutes
- Regulatory approaches
- Health-based
- Feasibility
- ? Risk-benefit
- FIFRA EPA must balance risks and benefits in
determining whether a pesticide presents an
unreasonable risk - Before registering pesticide, EPA must determine
it will not pose unreasonable risk taking into
account the economic, social, and environmental
costs and benefits of pesticides. - Many environmentalists worry that statutes like
FIFRA and TSCA that require EPA to balance risk
and benefit may lead to paralysis by analysis - Risk-benefit analysis has many critics
- Can slow down regulation and make it more
difficult and thus less likely government will
restrict harmful toxic substances - For example, under FIFRA it took EPA 17 years to
carry out a review of pesticide Alar
33Informational approaches
- Public pressure and market choices to address
problem - Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
Act of 1986 through TRI as we discussed earlier
companies reduce toxic releases because they
dont want to show up high on list - Problems include
- Self-reporting can encourage companies to change
reporting standards - May not require companies to report amount of
toxics used or what is in their productsso
ultimately may do little to reduce exposure to
toxins
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
34Precaution
- Politically, truly precautionary regulation can
be difficult to sustain - Under the precaution approach, some substances
will be regulated that will eventually turn out
to be relatively safe - Producers and consumers will likely cite false
positives as evidence that the government is
over-regulating
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
35Future of toxics
- We need new paradigm of toxic pollution
policyonly fraction of EPAs resources devoted
to prevention instead of end-of-pipe cleanup - European cxample REACH (Registration,
Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals) - European Union policy based on precautionary
principal - Standards for taking regulatory action much more
proactive/precautionary than US policies
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
36Bisphenol-A (BPA)
- Widely used to make hard, clear polycarbonate
plastics for baby bottles and sipping cups, water
bottles, and food containers (most canned foods)
(7 plastic that is clear and hard) - Trace amounts of BPA leach from polycarbonate
containers into foods and liquids - 2003-4 study by CDC found detectable levels of
BPA in 93 of urine samples collected from gt
2,500 adults and children over 6 - Last week US National Toxicology Program released
draft report that rats fed or injected low doses
BPA developed - precancerous tumors
- urinary tract problems
- reached puberty early
- possibility that bisphenol-a may alter human
development cannot be dismissed.
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
37Bisphenol-A alternatives
- In past week Nalgene announced will stop using
BPA in their polycarbonate products - Many large Canadian retailers, including
Wal-Mart, removing food-related products made
with plastics containing BPA - Wal-Mart (and other retailers) have agreed to
pull baby bottles made with bisphenol-a from its
U.S. stores early next year - Other alternatives
- Fresh (or frozen) vegetables alternative can
liners used by some companies and Japan - Glass, porcelain and stainless-steel containers,
particularly for hot foods and liquids - Several companies sell BPA-free baby bottles and
sippy cups
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
38MAINE CASE STUDYAn Act to Protect Childrens
Health and the Environment from Toxic Chemicals
in Toys and Childrens Products
- Last week Maine Legislature passed and governor
signed bill into law to track, and potentially
ban, harmful chemicals in childrens products - LD 2048 requires Department of Environmental
Protection to keep a list of chemicals it
identifies as harmful - DEP identifies chemicals of high concern
- Manufacturers of childrens products sold in
Maine have to disclose if their products contain
these chemicals - Could be required to replace the chemicals if
safer, cost-effective alternatives exist - Maine is going to participate in interstate
clearinghouse of information of what is in
childrens products so others can learn from the
states experience - Students in ES266 The Environment and Human
Health (Prof. Carlson) helped to support this
bill through class projects, including holding a
public information session and talking with
legislators
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
39Brominated Flame Retardants
- Common in plastics, electronics, textiles in
furniture rugs foams used in mattresses
furniture - BFRs in human breast milk rapidly increasing,
threaten normal brain development in fetuses and
children - Accumulating in people and animals
- Policies to phase out have been adopted in EU,
Sweden, Norway, Germany, Austria, China,
Netherlands - Many corporations are switching to safer flame
retardants - Maine Banned BRFs because similar to PCBs
- First in nation law to ban some of these
substances - Other states have now banned them also
Extent and impacts Toxicity factors and
classes Monitoring Regulation and information
40Happy Earth Day ?