Title: Community Engagement as a Methodological Practice
1Community Engagement as a Methodological Practice
- Uzo Anucha
- School of Social Work, York University
- Metropolis, British Columbia
- October 22, 2009
2Presentation Outline
- Community-Engaged Scholarship
- What, Who, Where, Why, and How?
- The Community-Dialogue Approach
- Community Dialogue Projects
- The Assets Coming Together for Youth Project
- The Ethno-cultural Women and Breast Health
Project - Discussion
- Building a Sustainable, Equitable
Community-University Research Partnership
3Community-Engaged Research
- Universities and funding agencies are
increasingly encouraging community-engaged
scholarship in which community partners
collaborate in defining the focus and
implementation of research.
- If a university is a repository of knowledge then
some of this knowledge should spill over to the
neighboring communities. A university should not
be an island where academics reach out at higher
and higher levels of knowledge without sharing
any of their findings Muhammad Yunus
4 Community-Engaged Scholarship
- The scholarship of Engagement means connecting
the rich resources of the university to our most
pressing social, civic and ethical problems, to
our children, to our schools, to our teachers and
to our cities.... Ernest Boyer in The
Scholarship of Engagement
- Community-engaged scholarship has shifted our
views on - The What, Who, Where, Why, and How of research
- Research dissemination
- Research impact
5Community-engaged scholarshipA shift in..
- What is research?
- Traditional research (TR) theory
- Community Engaged Research (CER) theory
practice - Who does research?
- TR profs and students
- CER profs and students community stakeholders
- Where to do research?
- TR university
- CER university community
6Community-engaged scholarshipA shift in..
- Why do research?
- TR knowledge / understanding
- CER knowledge / understanding helping / making
things better /creating change - How to do research?
- TR method
- CER method dialogue
7The Community-Dialogue Approach
- The Community Dialogue Approach (CDA).
- CDA re-imagines community engagement as a
methodological practice and research as a
community dialogue that must fully engage the
community.
8The Community-Dialogue Approach Two Key Features
- First A commitment to extensively involve the
community during all phases of the research - from defining the focus of the research to
implementation and dissemination of the research.
9The Continuum of Community Involvement in Research
None
A Lot Top-down
Consultation Collaboration
Partnership Community-led TR CER
(Adapted from Winer and Ray 2000)
9
10Involving the Community some things to consider
- Embrace a broad definition of community and
look for ways to widen the margin - Develop fundable roles for community members
- Build capacity within the community - ideally,
work yourself out of a job but leave a trace
11The Community-Dialogue Approach Two Key Features
- Second A commitment to tell multiple stories of
the issue / community that is the focus of the
research. Multi-methods / multi-focal research - allows for the inclusion of multiple voices to
inform an understanding of an issue under study. - avoids the danger of a single story about an
issue / community.
12Why is a Single Story of a Community so
Dangerous?
- Click here Chimamanda Adichie The danger of a
single story Video on TED.comĀ
13Assets Coming Together for Youth Project
14The Assets Coming Together for Youth Project
- The ACT for Youth Project (2009 - 2014) brings
together a cross-sectoral alliance of community
stakeholders and an interdisciplinary network of
scholars in a program of research, capacity
building, knowledge transfer and evaluation that
is focused on developing a comprehensive youth
strategy for youth in urban communities using the
Jane-Finch community as a case study. - Funded through a SSHRC CURA Grant
15Two Conceptual Frameworks
- Positive Youth Development (PYD) Youth are not
problems but assets for their communities - Social Justice Approach A perspective that
recognizes that youth in urban communities
experience social, political and economical
forces such as racism, sexism, poverty,
zero-tolerance, unemployment, etc that are
toxic to their well-being.
16ACT for Youth Project Team
- A cross-sectoral alliance of community
stakeholders and an interdisciplinary network of
scholars - 31 project team members
- 13 community members
- 15 academic members
- 3 graduate students
- 27 community partners
- Youth-led / Youth-centred Organizations
- Multi-service Community Organizations
- Faith-based Organizations
- Provincial / National Organizations
- Coalitions
17Governance Structure
18Research Impact and DisseminationA Mix of TR
and CER..
- How do we want the J-F community to remember
that the ACT for Youth project was there? - Changed the conversation / public discourse about
youth in the J-F community - Increased research skills of youth, community
practitioners and students - Increased the communitys awareness of how to
create pathways to developmental assets for youth - Generated local-level data that will inform the
communitys selection of tested and effective
initiatives for PYD
19Research Impact and DisseminationA Mix of TR
and CER..
- Translated knowledge through youth-focused
dissemination - forums and workshops
- arts-based approaches exhibitions,
documentaries - published materials such as manuals, guides,
curricula, policy-relevant publications as well
as academic books and papers - Enriched curriculum in professional and
interdisplinary programmes in universities. - Trained students who are knowledgeable on how
research can be directly linked to policy and
action - ??
20The Ethno-Cultural Women and Breast Health Project
21The Ethno-cultural Women and Breast Health Project
- Community-based health promotion research
project focused on better understanding the
barriers and facilitators to accessing breast
health in Windsor/Essex County within the context
of language and cultural differences. - The project focused on ethno-cultural women from
continental Africa and Asia (South Asians, East
Asians and West Asians) who experience language
and cultural challenges. - This project was funded by the Canadian Breast
Cancer Foundation Ontario Chapter,
Community-based research grant
22Multi-Methods.
- In-depth interviews with 80 ethno-cultural women
to explore their knowledge of breast cancer
beliefs regarding breast cancer perceptions of
health and breast screening practices. - Sampling criteria included ethno-cultural women
from continental Africa and Asia (South Asians,
East Asians and West Asians) who were 45 years
old or older - Interviews were conducted by community liaisons
in the first-language of participants, taped with
their consent, transcribed verbatim and
translated into English. - The community liaisons used an interview guide
that was focused on illuminating the life world
of participants and their personal experiences
with breast health and/or breast cancer
treatment. - Participants were paid a small honorarium
23Promoting Breast Health for Ethno-cultural Women
- Findings informed the development of a health
promotion workshop to increase the knowledge of
women from ethno-cultural communities on breast
cancer and the importance of breast screening - we collaborated with community organizations
especially, ethno-cultural and religious
organizations in hosting and delivering the
workshops. - we drew on the expertise of members of these
organizations in delivering the workshops. - workshops were offered in the language that women
preferred and in a setting that they were
comfortable in. - we drew on culturally-appropriate materials to
enhance the delivery of the workshops.
24Promoting Breast Health for Ethno-cultural Women
- The project partnered with settlement
organizations and cultural /religious
associations in delivering 18 health promotion
workshops (HPW) to 256 women. - The objective of the HPW was to provide a safe
and culturally appropriate environment for
ethno-cultural women to engage in dialogue about
breast health - Pre and post test evaluation of the workshops
indicated that there were positive intervention
effects for the women in all areas including
general breast cancer and screening knowledge,
perceived benefits to clinical breast exams and
mammograms, as well as perceived barriers to both
clinical breast exams and mammograms
25Comments and Questions?
26Discussion
- Building a Sustainable, Equitable
Community-University Research Partnership
27For information on our community-dialogue
projects, check out our website
www.yorku.ca/aswreg Uzo AnuchaTel
416.726.2100 x 23080email anucha_at_yorku.ca