Title: Studying Happiness: WellBeing Interventions And Individual Differences
1Studying Happiness Well-Being Interventions And
Individual Differences
Annabel Naftali Dianne Vella-Brodrick School
of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological
Medicine, Monash University
2Background - SWB
- Subjective well-being
- Positive affect (PA)
- Negative affect (NA)
- Satisfaction with life (SWL)
- The benefits of being happy
- Health physical and psychological
- Success social, work, education
- Broaden-and-Build Theory of PA (Fredrickson)
3IS IT POSSIBLE TO CHANGE SWB?
- Hedonic adaptation
- (Set-point theory, dynamic equilibrium)
- Sustained change is unlikely
- Model of longitudinal well-being (Chronic
Happiness) - (Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, Schkade, 2005)
- 50 hereditary. Personality is the strongest
predictor - 10 circumstances
- 40 - intentional activity
- What people choose to do, to think and to aspire
for in daily life - Flexible, changeable, can be manipulated to
affect SWB
4InterventionsCounting Blessings
- Counting blessings means that you make an
effort to think about the many things in your
life, both large and small, that you have to be
grateful about. These might include particular
supportive relationships, sacrifices or
contributions that others have made for you,
facts about your life such as your advantages and
opportunities, or even gratitude for life itself,
and the world that we live in. In all of these
cases you are identifying previously
unappreciated aspects of your life, for which you
can be thankful. - Why is gratitude a good thing?
- Focus on positive rather than negative emotions
past, present, future - Linked to other positive conditions like optimism
and self-esteem - Increases engagement with the present, which is
linked to SWB
5InterventionsBest Possible Self
- Best Possible Self means that you imagine
yourself in the future, after everything has gone
as well as it possibly could. You have worked
hard and succeeded at accomplishing all of your
life goals. Think of this as the realization of
your life dreams, and of your own best
potentials. In all of these cases you are
identifying the best possible way that things
might turn out in your life, in order to help
guide your decisions now. - Why is it good to write about life goals?
- - Triggers healthy self regulation processes
increases awareness into emotional reactions,
values, and priorities - - Insightful thinking is linked to positive
outcomes - - Visualizing goals promotes progress towards
the goals - - Both goal striving and goal progress are
important for well-being
6PlaceboLife Details
- Life details means that you take notice of the
ordinary details of your life that you wouldnt
typically think about. These might include
particular classes or meetings you attend,
typical interactions with acquaintances, typical
thoughts that you have during the day, or your
typical schedule as you move through the day. In
all of these cases, you may be helped to better
identify problem areas in your life, and to take
action to change them.
7Do all people benefit from all interventions the
same way
What determines the effectiveness of those
techniques?
8Character Strengths
- Classification system of humans strengths
- Values In Action (VIA)
- (Peterson Seligman, 2004)
- 24 Character Strengths and Virtues
- Acting upon strengths is fulfilling and
satisfying - Finding new ways to express strengths enhances
positive affect and reduced negative symptoms. - Some strengths were found to be most strongly
associated with satisfaction with life - Gratitude
- Love
- Hope
- Zest
- Curiosity
9Aim
- Investigate the effect of counting blessings (CB)
and best-possible self (BPS) on SWB - Explore the involvement of gratitude and hope in
the effect of CB and BPS
10Hypotheses
- CB and BPS will increase PA, NA, SWL (from
pre-intervention to post-intervention measures) -
- Gratitude will be positively correlated with
change in SWB (from pre- to post-intervention
measures) - in the counting blessings group
- 3. Hope will be positively correlated with
change in SWB (from pre- to post-intervention
measures) - in the best possible self group
11The sample
- 305 adults from the general community
- Age range 18-85
- 76 females (M26.8, SD14.02)
- 21 males (M25.91, SD12.26)
- Randomly allocated to one of three groups
12Measures
- Subjective Well-Being
- Positive and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS)
- (Watson, Clark, Tellegen, 1988)
- Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS)
- (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, Griffin, 1985)
- Hope
- The Adult Trait Hope Scale (THS)
- (Snyder, Harris, Anderson, et. Al, 1991)
- Gratitude
- The Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6)
- (McCollough Emmons, Tsang, 2002)
- Social desirability
- Short version of Marlowe-Crownes MC-(20)
- (Strahan Gerbasi, 1972)
13Procedure
- SWB
- Hope
- Gratitude
- Intervention
- SWB
- Social Desirability
- Online / pen and paper
- Participants to complete in their own time
14Statistical Analysis
- Hypothesis 1
- CB and BPS will increase PA, NA, SWL
- Three (2X3) mixed model Two-way ANOVAs
- Within factor Time of measurement pre, post
- Between factor Intervention type CB, BPS,
Control - Depenent Variable 1.Post PA
- 2.Post NA
- 3.Post SWL
15Statistical Analysis
- Hypothesis2 Gratitude is related to SWBchange
in CB - Hypothesis3 Hope is related to SWBchange in BPS
- Pearsons Correlations
- Separate correlations were calculated for the
three intervention groups (CB, BPS, Control)
between the scales - Gratitude, Hope, PAchange, NAchange, SWLchange
- Change variables are (Post SWB scores) (Pre
SWB scores)
16Results
Three (2X3) mixed model Two-way ANOVAs Main
effects of time of measurement, main effects of
intervention type, and interaction effects (time
X intervention)
- 1. PA Time F(1,302)67.67, plt.001, ?².18
- Intervention F(2,302)1.26, pgt.05, ?².01
- Interaction F(2,302)8.89, plt.001, ?².06
- 2. NA Time F(1,302)28.02, plt.001, ?².09
- Intervention F(2,302)2.76, pgt.05, ?².02
- Interaction F(2,302)0.34, pgt.05, ?².00.
-
- 3. SWL Time F(1,302)65.20, plt.001, ?².18
- Intervention F(2,302).07, pgt.05, ?².00
- Interaction F(2,302)7.37, plt.01, ?².05
17Results in English
Are the counting blessings (CB) and best possible
self (BPS) interventions effective?
- Positive Affect (PA)
- CB, BPS (and life details) increased PA
- CB and BPS - greater increase than life details
- Negative Affect (NA)
- CB, BPS (and life details) decreased NA
- Satisfaction With Life (SWL)
- CB, BPS (and life details) increased SWL
- CB - greater increase than BPS and life details
18(No Transcript)
19Results
Correlation Coefficients Between the Strengths
Hope and Gratitude and the SWB Change Scores for
CB, BPS and control Groups.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level
(2-tailed).
20Results in English
Are the strengths of gratitude and hope involved
in the effect of the interventions?
- The only significant correlation between
character strengths and subjective well-being
change was between - Gratitude and Positive Affect for the counting
blessings group (4.3)
21What do the results mean?
- The counting blessings and the best possible self
interventions can effectively enhance SWB
(immediately after completing the intervention
task) - The life-details placebo group, can also enhance
SWB - The counting blessings intervention is more
effective than best possible self at increasing
SWL
22What do the results mean?
- People with higher gratitude gain a greater
increase in PA than people with lower gratitude
by practicing counting blessing - Hope does not seem to have a direct immediate
effect on SWB enhancement when practicing best
possible self
23What do the results mean in theREAL WORLD?
- Happiness seekers can be taught simple writing
tasks like counting blessings, best possible
self, and life details - These methods are simple and can be varied and
adjusted according to individuals life style and
needs - Positive interventions can be incorporated into
traditional psychological treatments - People with greater initial gratitude should be
recommended to engage in the counting blessings
method if they wish to increase their well-being
24- THANK YOU!
- Any questions?