Title: 2002 FARM ACT: The Farm Security
12002 FARM ACT The Farm Security Rural
Investment Act of 2002 (FSRIA)
- Lesson 5cAGEC 3703
- Larry D. Sanders
- Fall 2005
Dept. of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma
State University
2Issues Affecting the Development Implementation
of the 2002 Farm Bill
- Public hidden agendas of Congress President
- The disappearing budget surplus
- Compliance with WTO
- 2002 election
- Agriculture split on desired goals how to
achieve them - Taxpayer backlash on welfare for the wealthy
- HAVE PRIORITIES CHANGED SINCE 9/11/01?
3The Farm Security Rural Investment Act of 2002
(FSRIA)
- Cost 180 bil-200 bil if in place 10 years
- Includes extra 73.5 over prev. budget
- 50 bil commodities
- 17 bil conservation
- 1 bil rural development
4FSRIA 02Overview
- 6-year act (2002-2007)
- 3 types of commodity support
- Direct payments continue above 2002 levels,
decoupled from production decisions and prices - Counter-cyclical program w/ target prices
decoupled from production decisions but tied to
market prices - Marketing loan gains Loan Deficiency Payments
continued, and tied to production decisions and
market prices
5FSRIA 02Overview (continued)
- Increase CRP acreage funding expand EQIP new
Conservation Security Program - Maintain/increase most trade, rural development
nutrition programs - Special incentives for beginning producers,
limited-resource farms Tribes for conservation
programs - Country of origin labeling for meat, fish,
produce, peanuts - Food stamps for illegal aliens
6FSRIA 02
- Payment Limits for Commodity Programs
- Counter-Cyclical payments w/65,000 payment
limit. - Direct payments w/40,000 payment limit
- Payments on 85 of base acres
- Marketing loan gains Loan Deficiency Payments
w/75,000 limit - Generic Certificates continued
- 3 - Entity Rule continued
- Producers with AGI over 2.5 million not eligible
for program participation, unless ¾ of AGI from
agriculture - In effect NO LIMITS FOR LARGER PRODUCERS
7FSRIA Commodity Programs Market Loss Assistance
(MLA) Loan Deficiency Payments (LDP)
- Eligible Production for MLA or LDP
- Producers of any quantity of a loan commodity
produced on a farm. - Compliance with Conservation and Wetland
Requirements - 9 month loans beginning 1st of month loan is
entered into
8FSRIA Commodity Programs MLALDP
- Repayment of MLA--Lesser of
- Loan rate or
- a rate Secretary determines will
- minimize loan forfeiture
- Minimize stock accumulations
- Minimize government storage costs
- Enable marketing in free market
- Minimize MLA benefit differences between counties
9FSRIA Commodity Programs MLALDP
- LDP rules
- Secretary may provide an LDP to producers on a
farm that produce unshorn pelts or hay and silage
derived from a loan commodity. - If producer agrees to forgo any other harvesting
of wheat, barley or oats, an LDP may be made on
these crops where the producer has agreed to
graze livestock.
10FSRIA 02 Marketing Loan Rates
Commodity 1996 Farm Bill 2002 Farm Bill 2002 Farm Bill
Commodity 2001 Rate 2002-2003 2004-2007
Corn (bu) 1.89 1.98 1.95
Sorghum (bu) 1.71 1.98 1.95
Barley (bu) 1.65 1.88 1.85
Oats (bu) 1.21 1.35 1.33
Wheat (bu) 2.58 2.80 2.75
Soybeans (bu) 5.26 5.00 5.00
Minor oilseeds (cwt) 9.30 9.60 9.30
Upland cotton (lb) 0.5192 0.52 0.52
Rice (cwt) 6.50 6.50 6.50
11FSRIA Commodity Programs Direct Payments
- Primary income support feature of 1996 Farm Bill
- Payments are decoupled from price and production
- Payment rates fixed through 2007
- Rate fixed over life of program, not declining
each year - Rate fixed per bushel, not fixed in total
spending - Payments include commodities covered under 1996
Production Flexibility Contract (PFC) plus
oilseeds - Payments have been green box payments under WTO
commitments - Annual Acreage reports will be required to
receive payments
12FSRIA Commodity Programs Direct Payments
- Commodity 1996 Farm Bill 2002 Farm Bill
- 2002 Payment 2002-2007
- Corn (bu) 0.261 0.28
- Sorghum (bu) 0.314 0.35
- Barley (bu) 0.202 0.24
- Oats (bu) 0.022 0.024
- Wheat (bu) 0.461 0.52
- Soybeans (bu) -- 0.44
- Minor oilseeds (cwt) -- 0.80
- Upland cotton (lb) 0.0572 0.0667
- Rice (cwt) 2.05 2.35
13FSRIA 02 Base Options
- FSA provides owners with 5 base options
- Retain 2002 PFC acres
- Retain 2002 PFC, add oilseeds without PFC offset
- Retain 2002 PFC, add oilseeds with max PFC offset
- Update bases using the 98-01 ac of covered
commodities - Retain 2002 PFC, add oilseed w/partial PFC offset
14FSRIA 02 Yield Options
- Statute provides for 95 payment yields
- 95 yields used for PFC (96-01)
- Payment yields frozen (86-01)
- Some opportunities for yield updates
- Counter-cyclical payment yield
15FSRIA Commodity Programs Direct Payments
- Acreage base determined by producer
- Average acreage for all covered commodities for
1998-2001 - Includes planted and prevented planted acres for
each crop over all four years - OR
- Acreage eligible for 2002 PFC payment plus
average oilseed acreage for 1998-2001 - Includes planted and prevented planted acres for
oilseeds over all four years - Payment base equal to 85 percent of acreage base
16FSRIA Commodity Programs Direct Payments
- Yield for base fixed at existing program yield
levels - Program yields for traditional program
commodities have been frozen since 1985 - Program yields for oilseeds will be local
1998-2001 average yields backed up to equivalent
1981-1985 yields (approximately 78 ).
17FSRIA Commodity Programs Direct Payments
- For 2003-2007
- Up to 50 percent of the direct payment beginning
December 1 of the calendar year prior to harvest
(on month of producers choice) - Remainder of direct payment in October of the
calendar year of harvest - May change in rules and regulations or technical
corrections legislation
18FSRIA Commodity Programs Counter-Cyclical
Payments
- Similar to target price/deficiency payment system
in farm programs prior to 1996 - Payments are decoupled from production, but not
from price - Target prices fixed for 2002-2003, rise for most
commodities for 2004-2007 - Payments include commodities covered under 1996
Production Flexibility Contract (PFC) plus
oilseeds - Payments are expected to be amber box payments
under WTO commitments
19FSRIA Commodity Programs Counter-Cyclical
Payments
-
- 1990 Farm Bill
2002 Farm Bill Target Prices - Commodity Target Price 2002-2003 2004-2007
- Corn (bu) 2.75 2.60 2.63
- Sorghum (bu) 2.61 2.54 2.57
- Barley (bu) 2.36 2.21 2.24
- Oats (bu) 1.45 1.40 1.44
- Wheat (bu) 4.00 3.86 3.92
- Soybeans (bu) -- 5.80 5.80
- Minor oilseeds (cwt) -- 9.80 10.10
- Upland cotton (lb) 0.729 0.7240 0.7240
- Rice (cwt) 10.71 10.50 10.50
20FSRIA Commodity Programs Counter-Cyclical
Payments
- Yield base
- Use previous program yield
- OR
- Partially updated program yield using both
existing program yields and 1998-2001 average
yields - Updated yield (average yield for 1998-2001 minus
existing program yield) 70 existing
program yield - OR
- Partially updated program yield using 1998-2001
average yields - Updated yield (average yield for 1998-2001)
93.5 - (minimum yield of 75of county average)
21FSRIA Commodity Programs Counter-Cyclical
Payments
- Payment calculations
- Counter-cyclical payment (CCP)/bu.
- Target Price Direct Payment (higher
of Loan Rate or market price) x (85 base acres) - Example - Wheat
- (3.86 - .52 2.80 ) x .85 .459
-
- MLA 2.80 MP 2.95
- DP .442 DP .442
- CCP .459 CCP .332
- Total 3.701 Total 3.724
22FSRIA Commodity Programs Counter-Cyclical
Payments
- BUT CURRENT ESTIMATES SUGGEST NO CCP (for this
year) - Calculation
- Counter-cyclical payment (CCP)/bu.
- Target Price Direct Payment (higher
of Loan Rate or market price) x (85 base acres) - Example - Wheat
- (3.86 - .52 4.00 ) x .85 0.00
- MP 4.00
- DP 0 .442
- CCP 0.00
- Total 4.442
23FSRIA Commodity Programs Counter-Cyclical
Payments
- Timing of Payments
- Made as soon as practicable after the end of the
12 month marketing year - May 30 for Wheat, Barley, Oats
- August 30 for Corn, Sorghum, Soybeans
- July 30 for Cotton and Rice
- Partial payment may be made
- First payment in October (35)
- Second payment in February (70)
- Final Payment at end of marketing year
-
24FSRIA 02 Advance Payments
- 75 of countercyclical available at end of 1st 6
months of marketing year
25Peanut Program
- Peanut quota buyout - .11/lb, 5 years (lump sum
up front or 5 annual payments) - Peanuts program becomes like other commodity
programs (direct countercyclical payments, MLA
LDP) - Same but separate payment limitations from other
commodity programs (a producer with both peanut
and other commodity base will not have payment
limits of one affect the other)
26FSRIA 02 Dairy
- Maintains 9.90/cwt support price
- Direct payments when Boston Class I below 16.94
(13.74 BFP) - Payment 45 of 16.94 less actual
- Capped at 2.4 mil (135-140 cows)/family member
- Retroactive to Dec. 1, 2001
- Runs to Sept. 30, 2005
27FSRIA Commodity Programs Summary
- Marketing loan benefits are based on bushels of
actual production, loan rates and market prices - Fixed payments are based on 85 percent of old
or new acreage and old yields, decoupled from
actual production and market prices - Counter-cyclical payments are based on 85 percent
of old or new acreage and old or new
yields, decoupled from actual production - Peanuts become like other commodity programs
- Dairy support continues but changes
28FSRIA 02 Conservation Programs
- Quadruples EQIP
- Conservation Security Program (Harkin) 2 billion
total - Adds 4 bil acres to CRP, WRP
29An Evolving Conservation Philosophy
- Previous programs focused on protecting
environment/natural resources compensating
producers/landowners - New philosophy is shifting toward working
farmland with a conservation ethic (increase from
current 7 to new 40 of program costs) - Farmers and ranchers should manage farmland to
provide cheap, high quality food and fiber and
environmental amenities (e.g. clean air and
water, wildlife habitat, open space, sequestered
carbon). - Additional 9 bil thru 2007 authorized
30FSRIA 02 Conservation Programs
- Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)
- expands previous program
- Conservation Security Program (CSP)
- major new program
- Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP)
- expands previous program
- Grassland Reserve Program (GRP)
- new program
- Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP)
- expands previous program
31FSRIA 02 Conservation Programs
- Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program (WHIP)
- expands previous program
- Farmland Preservation Program (FPP)
- expands previous program
- Small Watershed Restoration Program (SWRP)
- expands previous program
- Conservation Compliance/ SodbusterSwampbuster
- continued
32Farm Economy Problems Does FSRIA have the
solutions?
- Price income issues (competition profits?)
- Production likely to increase, w/downward
pressure on price - May have complicated WTO issues
- More farm income will come from taxpayers
- Government support distribution issues
- Free market failed government support necessary
- No solution to distribution issues?
- Natural resource issues
- some innovation (CSP)
- Structural issues
- No solution likely encourage concentration
- Food safety availability issues
- additional funds
33Preliminary Evaluation of FSRIA
- Higher payments, with distribution similar to
current program - If youve been generally satisfied w/payments of
past 6 years, youll probably like FSRIA in
short run in long run??? - Bill effectively proves that the free market is
not what agriculture wants - Not size-neutral, but encourages concentration
- May not be WTO-compatible
- Expansion of conservation programs
- May encourage stewardship
34Preliminary Evaluation of FSRIA (cont.)
- Livestock receipts likely to increase
- Related to cheap available feed?
- Related to producers looking for profit
alternatives when crop prices down? - Farm land values likely to increase
(capitalization) - Equipment other input prices likely to increase
- Government support to agriculture likely to
increase beyond projections be reconsidered in
3-4 years
35Preliminary Evaluation of FSRIA (cont.)
- More farms likely to go out of business or
increase proportion of income from non-farm
sources - Larger farms may do well
- Landlords and landowners will do well short run
36APPENDIX
- Marketing Loan Mechanics
- WTO Restrictions
- Proposals that did not survive to final bill
37FSRIA 02 Marketing Loan Program Mechanics
- Potential LDP or MLG is equal to the loan rate
minus the PCP - PCP is equal to the higher of two terminal market
prices minus the county differential relative to
each terminal market - Differences in county differentials to terminals
similar to differences in loan rates across
counties - PCP reflects terminal prices from previous days
market
38Marketing Loan Program Mechanics (cont)
- Producer can take LDP any day after harvesting
crop and before losing beneficial interest in the
commodity - LDP equal to loan rate minus that days PCP
- OR
39Marketing Loan Program Mechanics (cont)
- Producer can take out marketing loan and receive
loan rate - Loan can be repaid before maturity at lower of
loan rate plus interest or PCP - A PCP can be locked in once for 60 days and the
loan repaid anytime in that 60 days at that
locked-in PCP - If not repaid in that 60 days, locked-in PCP
expires and loan can be repaid at that days PCP - OR
- Loan can be repaid with generic certificates
- OR
- Loan can be held to maturity and forfeited to
government
40Add the wrinkle of whether farm program changes
pass WTO test
- Amber box policies that are trade distorting
targeted for reductions under the URA (price
supports, marketing loans, payments based on ac
or of livestock, input subsidies, etc.) - Blue box policies that are trade distorting but
exempt from reductions under URA, including
direct payments linked to certain
production-limiting policies (US crop deficiency
payments, EC compensatory payments, etc.) - Green Box policies that are non-trade
distorting are acceptable under URA, including
taxpayer-funded and non-transfers from consumers
(research, extension, pest/disease control, crop
insurance, marketing/promotion, natural disaster
relief, conservation programs, public
stockholding, decoupled income support, income
safety nets, etc.)
41Provisions That Did Not Survive to Final Bill
- Effective and Targeted Payment Limits
- Packer Ownership Ban
- Cuba Provision
- More restrictive/comprehensive country-of-origin
labeling rules - Major shift from commodity support programs to
either risk management or green payment programs