Fire Dynamics I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Fire Dynamics I

Description:

Carleton University, 82.575 (CVG7300), Fire Dynamics I, Winter 2002, Lecture # 11 ... Flames impinge on specimen mounted on ceiling (S102) or floor (S102.2) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:349
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: jimm219
Category:
Tags: dynamics | fire | impinge

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fire Dynamics I


1
Fire Dynamics I
  • Lecture 11
  • Flammability of Solids
  • Jim Mehaffey
  • 82.575 or CVG7300

2
  • Flammability of Solids
  • Outline
  • Characterizing flammability
  • Non-combustibility test
  • Degrees of combustibility test
  • Room fire test
  • Flame-spread ratings
  • Corner wall test
  • Flame spread models

3
  • Characterizing Flammability Common Descriptors
  • 1. Ignitability (piloted // non-piloted)
  • ignition temperature
  • critical flux for ignition
  • time to ignition (scenario dependent)
  • 2. Combustibility
  • noncombustible vs combustible (temperature rise
    / persistence of flaming / mass loss)
  • degree of combustibility (heat release)
  • 3. Heat release
  • rate of heat release vs time
  • peak rate of heat release
  • total heat released

4
  • Characterizing Flammability Common Descriptors
  • 4. Flame spread
  • arbitrary index
  • rate of flame spread
  • extent of flame spread
  • critical flux for flame spread
  • 5. Production of smoke and toxic gases
  • rate, peak and total
  • Which descriptors best assess a solids
    flammability depends on the scenario of interest
    and hazard of concern. When countries developed
    test methods to regulate wall coverings, they
    devised different tests that measured different
    aspects of flammability.

5
  • European Flammability Tests
  • Project conducted by H.W. Emmons, Harvard Univ.
  • 24 wall coverings were tested in 6 countries.
    Each country used its own test method.
  • In each country, coverings were ranked 1, 2,
    23, 24 according to their performance. 1
    exhibited the worst performance 24 exhibited the
    best.
  • An average ranking for each covering was
    established by averaging its rank in all 6 tests.
  • A graph was constructed with the ranking for each
    covering in each country on the ordinate and the
    average for each covering on the abscissa

6
  • European Flammability Tests
  • Order of flammability of 24 wall coverings as
    tested in 6 countries. If each test measured the
    same property, all point would fall along the
    diagonal.

7
  • European Flammability Tests
  • Order of 24 materials drawn 6 times from deck
    of cards. Plot reflects random process. Same as
    flammability study.
  • Europe is now harmonizing its test methodology

8
  • Combustible vs Noncombustible Building Materials
  • Ignitability measure of ease of ignition
  • surface temperature at ignition
  • critical heat flux
  • time to ignition for flux gt critical heat flux
  • Combustibility measure of potential to
    contribute to fire
  • In Canada, a building material is noncombustible
    if it meets the acceptance criteria of
  • CAN4-S114, Standard method of test for
    determination of non-combustibility in building
    materials
  • Otherwise it is combustible

9
  • CAN4-S114 Test Apparatus

10
  • CAN4-S114 Test Apparatus
  • Test specimen 38 x 38 x 50 (mm)
  • Condition specimens for 24 to 48 h at 60 ? 3C
    and let cool to room temperature
  • Stabilize furnace at 750 ? 3C for 15 minutes
  • Specimen inserted and monitored for 15 minutes
    (or until it fails)

11
  • CAN4-S114 Acceptance Criteria
  • Building material is non-combustible if
  • Average maximum temperature rise (3 tests) ? 36
    C
  • No flaming during last 14 min 30 s in any of 3
    tests
  • Maximum mass loss ? 20 in any of 3 tests
  • A pass / fail test
  • No measure of degree of combustibility

12
  • CAN4-S114 Observations
  • Furnace is at temperature 750 C 1023 K
  • Emissive power of internal walls of furnace is
  • E1 ? ? T4 0.9 x 5.67 x 10-8 W m-2 K-4 x
    (1023 K)4
  • E1 56 kW m-2
  • Heat flux at surface of specimen is
  • E1 F1-d2
  • The configuration factor would be high ( 1) so
    flux exceeds critical radiant flux for
    auto-ignition of wood namely 28 kW m-2

13
  • CAN4-S114 Observations
  • Mass loss ? 20 excepts hydrated materials that
    are not combustible
  • Gypsum is CaSO4 2H2O so is about 21 by mass
    chemically bound water
  • The chemically bound water is driven from gypsum
    between 100 to 200C.
  • Core of gypsum board is about 70 gypsum
  • Core of gypsum board losses about 15 of its mass
    in test so classified as noncombustible

14
  • CAN4-S114 Douglas Fir
  • Douglas fir is classified as combustible

15
  • CAN4-S114 Glass-fibre Insulation
  • This glass-fibre insulation is classified as
    combustible

16
  • CAN4-S114 Aluminium
  • Aluminium is classified as non-combustible

17
  • Combustible vs. Non-combustible
  • Combustible materials wood products, paper,
    plastics, felt (animal or vegetable fibres)
  • Non-combustible materials brick, ceramics,
    metals, glass, granite, sandstone, slate, marble,
    plaster (gypsum non-combustible
    aggregate), concrete (portland cement non-comb
    aggregate)
  • Analogous US test is ASTM E136. Temp rise
    criterion is assessed at specimen centre. ASTM
    E136 ? to be non-combustible must have less than
    3-4 organic content.
  • Addition of fire retardants does not usually make
    a material non-combustible.

18
  • National Building Code Requirements
  • Non-combustible construction
  • Structural members non-combustible
  • Restricted use of combustibles elsewhere (3.1.5.)
  • Combustible construction
  • Wood-frame or heavy timber
  • Whether bldg must be of non-combustible
    construction or is permitted to be of combustible
    construction depends on
  • major occupancy
  • number of storeys
  • building area
  • number of streets building faces
  • presence of sprinklers

19
  • Shortcomings of Non-combustibility Test
  • A severe pass / fail test
  • No measure of degree of combustibility (that is
    actual performance)
  • Treats materials not products like gypsum board

20
  • Degrees of Combustibility Test
  • CAN/ULC-S135, Standard method of test for
    determination of degrees of combustibility of
    building materials using an oxygen consumption
    calorimeter (cone calorimeter)
  • Specimen subjected in cone calorimeter to heat
    flux of 50 kW m-2 in presence of spark ignition
    source for 15 minutes
  • Observations and potential means for
    classification
  • time to ignition (s)
  • heat release rate (peak) (kW m-2 )
  • total heat released (kJ m-2 )

21
  • Factors Affecting Rate of Spread of Flame
  • Material Factors
  • Chemical Composition of fuel
  • Presence of fire retardants
  • Physical Initial temperature
  • Surface orientation
  • Direction of propagation
  • Thickness
  • Thermal conductivity
  • Specific heat
  • Density
  • Geometry
  • Continuity

22
  • Factors Affecting Rate of Spread of Flame
  • Environmental Factors
  • Composition of atmosphere
  • Temperature
  • Imposed heat flux
  • Air velocity

23
  • Spread of Flame over Wall Linings

24
  • Spread of Flame over Wall Linings

25
  • Room Fire Test - Apparatus
  • ISO 9705 Fire tests Full scale room fire tests
    for surface products

26
  • Room Fire Test - Procedure
  • Line walls and ceiling with product
  • Burner in back corner
  • First 10 min 100 kW (large wastepaper
    basket)
  • Last 10 min 300 kW (small upholstered
    chair)
  • Observe time to flashover
  • Room experiences flashover when ? 1,000 kW

27
  • Room Fire Test - Results

28
  • Flame-spread Ratings - Building Materials
  • CAN/ULC-S102 "Standard Method of Test for
    Surface-Burning Characteristics of Building
    Materials and Assemblies
  • CAN/ULC-S102.2 "Standard Method of Test for
    Surface-Burning Characteristics of Flooring,
    Floor Coverings, and Miscellaneous Materials and
    Assemblies"

29
  • Flame-spread Ratings - Test Apparatus

30
  • Flame-spread Ratings - Test Apparatus
  • Test equipment Horizontal tunnel
  • 7.6 m long 450 mm wide 300 mm deep
  • Roof Removable
  • Low-density mineral board
  • Walls and Floor Fire brick
  • Observation windows Along one wall

31
  • Flame-spread Ratings - Test Method
  • Condition specimen at 23 ? 3C and relative
    humidity of 50 ? 5
  • Natural gas flames (2 burners) forced down tunnel
    by draught 1.2 m s-1
  • Burners f lames 1.37 m long // ? 90 kW
  • Flames impinge on specimen mounted on ceiling
    (S102) or floor (S102.2)

32
  • Flame-spread Ratings - Test Method
  • Calibration Adjust so it takes 5.5 min for
    flames to travel to end of red oak specimen
  • In exhaust duct Light source detector to
    measure obscuration due to smoke
  • Test protocol Monitor advance of flame smoke
    obscuration for 10 min
  • Run 3 tests for each product

33
  • Flame-spread Rating (FSR)
  • Fixed points
  • Red oak . . . . . . . . . . 100
  • Inorganic board . . . . . . 0
  • Determination of rating
  • Plot flame front position vs time
  • Calculate area At under curve ignoring recessions
  • FSR 1.85 At if At ? 29.7 m min
  • FSR 1640 / (59.4 - At) if At gt 29.7 m min

34
  • Flame-spread Rating (FSR)
  • If initial rapid advance
  • FSR 92.3 d / t
  • d distance of rapid advance (m)
  • t time of rapid advance (min)
  • or employ
  • ULC-S127, Standard corner wall method of test
    for flammability of non-melting building
    products

35
  • CAN/ULC- S102 Red Oak and Plywood
  • At (red oak) 43.0 m min ? FSR (red oak) 100
  • At (plywood) 47.2 m min ? FSR (plywood) 135

36
  • CAN/ULC-S102 Gypsum Board
  • At (gypsum board) A1 A2 8.0 m min
  • ? FSR (gypsum board) 15

37
  • CAN/ULC- S102 Loose-fill Cellulose Insulation
  • At (loose-fill cellulose insulation) A1 A2
    30 m min
  • ? FSR (loose-fill cellulose insulation) 55

38
  • CAN/ULC- S102 Polyurethane Foam Insulation
  • FSR (PU foam insulation) 427 (d/t) or 74 (At)

39
  • Comparison with ASTM E84
  • ASTM E84 specimen tested in ceiling // only
    uses area expressions (with different
    coefficients)
  • When area expressions governs (S102)
  • FSR (E84) ? 0.92 FSR (S102)
  • When rate expression governs (S102)
  • FSR (E84) lt FSR (S102)
  • When products tested to S102.2, generally
    difficult to compare. However for melting
    materials
  • FSR (E84) lt FSR (S102)

40
  • Comparison with Room Fire Tests
  • NBCC requires protective barrier for foam
    plastic insulation

41
  • Corner Wall Test
  • ULC-S127, Standard corner wall method of test
    for flammability characteristics of non-melting
    building materials

42
  • Corner Wall Test
  • Test chamber cubical - 1300 mm
  • Test specimen 2 walls, ceiling canopies
  • Ignition source 33 kW natural gas burner
  • Measure time (s) until thread breaks

43
  • Corner Wall Test

44
  • Building Code Requirements Interior Finish
  • Purpose If interior finish ignited early in
    fire, flames must not spread so quickly that
    occupants are unable to escape
  • Example An apartment building (no sprinklers)

45
  • Shortcomings with the Tunnel Test
  • FSR is not a fundamental property. It cannot be
    used to predict rate of flame spread in filed
    conditions that differ from test conditions.
  • For example performance in tunnel is unrelated
    to
  • performance of foamed plastic insulation in a
    wall cavity
  • performance of textile coverings on walls
  • performance of interior finish exposed to
    external radiant flux

46
  • Flame Spread Models Concepts
  • Flame spread an advancing ignition front
  • Leading edge of flame is heat source (raising
    fuel to ignition temp) and the pilot
  • Visually flame spread ? advancing flame close to
    solid
  • Two interacting advancing fronts
  • flame front in gas phase
  • pyrolysis front along solid surface
  • Heat transfer from flame ? pyrolysis front to
    advance
  • Advance of pyrolysis front ? increased release of
    volatiles ? advance of flame front
  • Flame-spread velocity ? rate of advance of
    pyrolysis front

47
  • Wind-aided Spread

48
  • Wind-aided Spread
  • ? region of heat transfer from flame smoke
  • For wind-aided spread 0.1 m ? ? ? 10 m
  • For opposed-flow spread 1 mm ? ? ? 3 mm
  • Surface temperature in control volume drops from
    Tig to Ts
  • Pyrolysis front moves at speed
  • Model for wind-aided flame spread

49
  • Example of Acceleratory Flame Spread
  • Upward turbulent spread on thick PMMA
  • xb 0 and n 0.94 1
  • Experiment finding
  • When xp 1.0 m, v 5.0 mm s-1

50
  • Example of Constant Flame Spread
  • Upward turbulent spread on thin textiles
  • n 0.6
  • After some time, (xp - xb) and v become constant

51
  • Opposed Flow Spread Model for Thick Materials
  • Quintiere and Harkleroad, 1985
  • ? flame-heating parameter (kW2 m-3) material
    property
  • Provided no dripping, this model holds for
  • downward flame spread (wall)
  • lateral flame spread (wall)
  • horizontal flame spread (floor)
  • ?, k?c and Tig - measured (LIFT apparatus)
  • Ts - depends on scenario (external flux)

52
  • LIFT Apparatus - Standard Tests
  • ASTM E1321, Standard test method for determining
    material ignition and flame spread properties
  • ISO 5668, Fire tests Reaction to fire surface
    spread of flame on building products

53
  • LIFT Apparatus

54
  • LIFT Apparatus - Results
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com