Unraveling the Pennsylvanian - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Unraveling the Pennsylvanian

Description:

Unraveling the Pennsylvanian – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:160
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: waynew7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unraveling the Pennsylvanian


1
Unraveling the Pennsylvanian
  • Wayne R. Wright
  • Bureau of Economic Geology
  • Jackson School of Geosciences
  • University of Texas at Austin

2
MorrowanAtokanDesmoinesian
MissourianVirgilian
3
(No Transcript)
4
Morrowan
5
Regional Sedimentation Patterns
  • Morrowan age siliciclastics dominate deposition
    in the west of the Permian Basin whereas
    carbonate deposition dominates in the east
  • 2nd-order transgression from siliciclastic
    fluvial deltaic to shallow marine and
    subsequently to carbonate deposition in the
    western Permian Basin.

6
MorrowanSiliciclastics
7
MORROWAN SILICICLASTICS
  • Large incised valley-fill system.
  • An up-dip to down-dip transition from fluvial and
    deltaic to estuarine and open marine facies.
  • Excellent reservoir potential is apparent in
    amalgamated, stacked channel systems and bay head
    deltas.
  • Conduits for shelf margin bypass during periods
    of lowstand. Such bypass channels may have fed
    sediment into the deeper basin resulting in
    lowstand slope and basin floor fan deposits.

8
Old 3 Zone Model
Upper (carbonate)Middle (siliciclastic) Lower
(siliciclastic)
(After Mazzulo, 1984)
9
Revised Model(Icehouse Conditions)
Old Model(Greenhouse Conditions)
10
Segment 3
(after Bowen and Weimer, 2003)
11
Proximal Segment 2
  • In the transitional facies towards the down-dip
    estuarine section, fluvial channels are separated
    by lower quality reservoir estuarine sands and
    reservoir quality, especially permeability, is
    decreased in these thinner more marine facies.

12
Proximal Segment 2
(after Bowen and Weimer, 2003)
13
Distal Segment 2
  • In the down-dip facies tract (estuarine),
    reservoir facies are sparsely developed fluvial
    channels are narrow, disconnected, thin and
    separated by thick estuarine basin shales.
    Down-dip bayfill deltas have excellent reservoir
    quality and targeting potential.

14
Distal Segment 2
(after Bowen and Weimer, 2003)
15
Ichnofacies and Stratigraphy
(after Buatois et al., 2002)
16
  • Diagenesis Dissolution of detrital grains and
    authigenic clays generating secondary porosity
    and permeability is very important to development
    of good reservoir quality, especially in the more
    estuarine to marine sands. Middle Morrow
    sandstones are more compositionally variable and
    provide the best production.

17
PERMIAN BASINDATA
18
Red box outlines the area of a previous
interpretation that depicted a shore parallel
lower Morrow facies belt overlain by a middle
Morrow facies belt prograding basinwards.
(modified after James, 1985)
Northwest Shelf
19
Permian Basin Incised Valley
Bay-head Delta System
Empire Field (Eddy Co.)
100ft
60ft Incision
(after Lambert, 1989)
Incised Valley Complex
8.5 miles/15.8 kilometers
20
Seismic Stratigraphy
Composite Sequence Boundary (Chester/Barnett and
lower and upper Morrow Fm.
2 miles/ 3.7 km
(after Van Dock and Gaiser, 2002)
21
Key Points on Siliciclastic Deposition
  • Scale and Stacking Patterns In icehouse times,
    such as the Pennsylvanian, higher order eustatic
    fluctuations can dominate over the lower order
    oscillations (e.g. extensive progradation during
    transgression).
  • Stacking patterns and facies tracts in icehouse
    systems may have substantially different
    geometries than greenhouse systems.
  • For example, the dip length of a 4th order
    fluvial system deposited during icehouse
    conditions is 3 times longer than the equivalent
    3rd order cycle in a green house setting.
  • Sediment Supply Sediment supply may be the
    largest controlling factor in Morrow
    siliciclastic sedimentation patterns. Extremely
    high and/or low sedimentation rates can produce
    sequence and facies stacking patterns that are
    quite different from those developed during more
    normal rates of sedimentation.

22
MorrowanCarbonates
(dominantly eastern Permian Basin)
23
Morrowan Carbonate Deposition
  • Deposition of the Upper Morrowan carbonate unit
    in the Delaware Basin and Northwest Shelf area
    indicates a switch from local tectonic to
    regional eustatic control as tectonism decreased
    in the hinterland and sediment supply diminished.
  • It appears that carbonate deposition occurred
    over a much larger area in the Permian Basin
    (Eastern Shelf and Delaware Basin) than
    previously documented.
  • Algally dominated bioherms and higher energy
    facies (ooid grainstones) containing fracture
    porosity are potentially overlooked reservoirs.
    With the current explosion of interest in the
    shale gas systems (primarily the Barnett but also
    the Smithwick) the overlying carbonate system are
    potential fractured reservoirs for expulsed
    Barnett gas.

24
Lower Marble Falls Fm.
  • The Llano uplift (Morrowan age) carbonate
    succession including the Lower Marble Falls Fm.
    is an analogue for the equivalent sections in the
    Permian Basin
  • What is it???

25
Stratigraphy of the Llano Uplift and Eastern Shelf
(after Erlich and Coleman, 2005)
26
Outcrop Analogue
1m
  • Regionally, the Lower Marble Falls bioherms
    contain Cuneiphycus (red algae) and rarer
    Donezella boundstones ranging in thickness from
    1-10m. Oolitic grainstones and phylloid algae
    wackestone/packstones are also common.
    Spiculite-bearing facies dominate the
    off-platform/ramp and intermound (biohermal)
    areas.

27
Morrowan Carbonates
  • Bioherm dimensions
  • Can reach 200ft/60m coalesced thickness with
    widths of 2000ft/610m in an ovoid shape
  • Are producing intervals
  • Generally fracture porosity augmented by primary
    intergranular and shelter porosity
  • Hands on look at Morrowan carbonates

28
Early Morrowan Paleogeography
29
Atokan
30
Regional Sedimentation Patterns
  • Atokan age siliciclastics dominated deposition in
    the west of the Permian Basin whereas carbonate
    deposition dominated in the remainder of the
    basin
  • 2nd-order transgression
  • aerially restricted lower Atokan fluvial deltaics
  • displaced by shallow marine siliciclastics
  • followed by pervasive carbonate deposition in the
    western Permian Basin.

31
AtokanSiliciclastics
32
Lower Atokan Siliciclastics
  • Sequence boundary marks Morrowan to Atokan
    transition.
  • The lower Atokan is characterized by lowstand
    deposition of alluvial and fluvial incised valley
    deposits (Eddy Co. NM and Cottle Co. TX),
    fan-delta deposits in the Palo Duro Basin and
    Upton Co. TX and basin-floor fans in Midland and
    Andrews Counties

33
Middle Atokan Siliciclastics
  • As mid-Atokan sea level rose, tectonic uplift of
    the Pedernal area decreased and marginal marine
    to open marine deltaic to shelfal siliciclastic
    sedimentation began to dominate.
  • Shoreline-parallel, barrier bar to shelf ridge
    sedimentation dominated in the Northwest Shelf
    area of New Mexico with a sediment source still
    largely from the northwest.
  • Extensive deposition of shale units (e.g.
    Smithwick Fm.) occurred during middle to upper
    Atokan time as the progradational front to the
    Atokan siliciclastics migrating westward from the
    Fort Worth Basin.

34
PERMIAN BASINDATA
35
  • Lowstand sandstone unit in the Type log for
    the Atokan succession on the Northwest Shelf

Porosity in the reservoir zone ranges from 9-12
Empire Field, Eddy Co. N.M.
(after James, 1985)
36
Middle AtokanTransgressive Siliciclastics
Shelf Ridges Or Barrier Island Arcs
(after James, 1985)
37
Smithwick Formation
  • Regionally extensive
  • Equivalents shales in the Delaware and Midland
    Basin
  • High organic carbon content (7.5 TOC)
  • Interfingers with both siliciclastic and
    carbonate units
  • Barnett-style shale gas play??

38
Key Points on AtokanSiliciclastic Deposition
  • Dominantly eustatic control of facies packaging
    and distribution minor tectonic input
  • Ozona Arch source area for the Upton and Midland
    Co. fan-delta and basin floor fans
  • Middle to late Atokan transgressive shore
    parallel sandstone bodies have good reservoir
    quality and a distribution that is relatively
    easy to predict using sequence stratigraphy

39
AtokanCarbonates
40
Atokan Carbonate Deposition
  • Atokan age carbonates in the Permian Basin are
    lateral equivalents to the Upper Marble Falls Fm.
    on the Eastern Shelf. The Eastern shelf
    succession provides both subsurface and surface
    analogues for the Permian Basin
  • Overall, Atokan carbonate deposition occurred
    over a much larger area in the Permian Basin than
    previously documented. Deposition of the
    carbonate occurred on low-angle ramps which
    developed into more platform-like geometries
    through time
  • Shallow-water Donezella algal bioherms and
    oolitic bioclastic grainstones are intrinsically
    the most favorable reservoir facies. However,
    reservoir intervals are not linked to a specific
    facies or exposure surface

41
PERMIAN BASINDATA
42
Chapman Deep Field(Reeves Co., TX)
(after Mazzulo, 1981)
Transgressive surface
Flooding surface
Sequence boundary
Total Atokan thickness 670-1200 ft/205-307 m
43
Chapman Deep Field
  • Primary porosity largely occluded
  • Secondary development of porosity during burial
    diagenesis via leaching
  • Extensive microfracture network

(after Mazzulo, 1981)
44
Upper Marble Falls Fm.
  • Bioherms tend to be dominated by Komia and
    Chaetetes
  • Bioherm dimensions equivalent to those of the
    Lower Marble Falls Fm.
  • Average 10 porosity and 2 to 6 mD permeability
    in mound/bioherms and shoals

45
Atokan Carbonate Distribution
  • The Upper Marble Falls Fm. is present on the
    Eastern Shelf within the Permian Basin and
    connects with a thick succession of carbonates
    nucleated on the Devils River Uplift in Val Verde
    and Edwards Co.
  • This carbonate dominated region links up across
    the Central Basin Platform and into the northern
    Delaware Basin

46
Atokan Paleogeography
47
Desmoinesian
48
Regional Sedimentation Patterns
  • Carbonate production dominated during the
    Desmoinesian the Permian Basin
  • Siliciclastic sediments are restricted to the
    Eastern Shelf and extreme northwest of the
    Permian Basin.

49
DesmoinesianSiliciclastics
50
Desmoinesian Siliciclastics
  • Cyclic sedimentation between siliciclastics and
    carbonates on the Eastern Shelf
  • Delta front facies present in the Permian Basin
    coarser facies (e.g. alluvial channels) generally
    to the east
  • Areally minor basin center shales

51
Eastern Shelf Succession
(after Cleaves, 2000)
  • The Dobbs Valley and Buck Creek depositional
    episodes prograded the farthest west

52
Deltaic Front Facies
  • Eastern Shelf
  • (e.g. Coke and Nolan Counties)

Buck Creek equivalent?
Tuscola Field (Taylor Co.)
110ft/33.5m
(after Shannon and Dahl, 1971)
Lowstand channels superimposed on a highstand
delta
53
Reservoir Quality and Diagenesis
  • Bbar crest laminated sandstones are the main
    producing interval. Secondary production comes
    from delta front channels
  • Porosity 0-15.2 (mean 5.3)
  • Permeability 0-387mD
  • Extensive cementation - quartz followed by
    calcite total occlution
  • Dissolution of calcite cement and framework
    grains yielded present porosity of 15

2.25in
54
DesmoinesianCarbonates
55
Desmoinesian Carbonate Deposition
  • Pervasive carbonate deposition in the Permian
    Basin
  • Early Desmoinesian
  • relatively uniform thickness and wireline log
    signature
  • ramp settings
  • Middle to Late Desmoinesian
  • Large thickness differences
  • Multitude of depositional settings ramps, patch
    reefs, shelf-margins, rimmed shelves
  • Shallow-water phylloid algal bioherms, Chaetetes
    reefs and bioclastic packstone/grainstones are
    the most favorable reservoir facies. Phylloid
    algae tend to dominate the bioherm community
    during the Desmoinesian.

56
Lower Desmoinesian Carbonates
57
(After Waite, 1993)
58
Southwest Andrews Field Area (Andrews Co.)
(after Saller et al. 1999)
59
(after Saller et al. 1999)
60
(after Saller et al. 1999)
61
Middle toUpper Desmoinesian Carbonates
62
Subsidence
  • Subsidence of the Midland Basin began in the
    Middle to Late Desmoinesian
  • Profound affect on the geometry of the carbonate
    depositional systems
  • True shelf margins formed on the Eastern shelf
    and along the southern margin of the Horseshoe
    Atoll
  • Overall, carbonates were aggradational in
    response to increased accommodation

63
Late Desmoinesian
  • Shelf-margin becomes geographically fixed

(after Mazzulo, 1989)
Nena Lucia Field (Nolan Co.)
64
Reservoir Quality in Desmoinesian Carbonates
  • Function of facies type and exposure related
    diagenesis
  • Best reservoir intervals lie below the sequence
    boundary between the Desmoinesian and Missourian
    (Strawn Fm.-Canyon Fm.). A second older regional
    exposure event also caps a reservoir interval
  • Porous zones range from 1000ft/300m to several
    mi/km across

65
Southwest Andrews Field Area (Andrews Co.)
Lateral reservoir quality beneath the sequence
boundary and associated exposure surface
(after Saller et al. 1999)
66
Deep Burial Diagenesis and Fracturing
  • Reservoir quality in the Val Verde Desmoinesian
    (Strawn Fm.) succession is tied to facies type,
    extent of subaerial exposure and is overprinted
    by compression induced fracturing following by
    migration of connate high-temperature oil-bearing
    fluids

67
South Branch Field (Terrell Co., TX)
Moldic porosity largely associated with phylloid
algal packstones linked by microfractures
Exposure related brecciation and pseudo-breccias
(after Newell et al. 2003)
68
Pakenham Field (Terrell Co., TX)
Stacked thrusted and backthrusted reservoir
intervals
Lateral facies changes
Structural complexity increases with depth
(after Montgomery, 1996)
69
Key Points on DesmoinesianCarbonate Deposition
  • Eustatic sea-level falls are vital for reservoir
    development
  • Desmoinesian carbonates are present on the
    Central Basin Platform and in the Val Verde Basin
    (i.e. Central Basin Platform was not uplifted yet
    and the Val Verde Basin had not truly formed)
  • Multiple play types are present
  • Subsidence of the Midland Basin began in the
    middle to late Desmoinesian with a eastern
    flexural hinge line corresponding to the Fort
    Chadbourne Fault Zone

70
Desmoinesian Paleogeography
71
MissourianVirgilian
72
MissourianVirgilian
  • Introduction to core workshop
  • SACROC 37_11 Core
  • Canyon and Cisco Formations
  • Icehouse System oscillations (65-460ft)
    (20-140m)
  • 700 ft (310m) thick reservoir column
  • lower-mid Canyon
  • open-shelf subtidal (low diagenetic alteration)
  • upper-Canyon to lower Cisco
  • high energy shoals (high diagenetic alteration)
  • Lowstand slope wedge debris aprons

73
Horseshoe Atoll?
(after Dutton, 2004)
74
SACROC
(after Dutton, 2004)
75
SACROC17-5
  • WLL and Facies for 17-5
  • Crestal Position
  • Subtidal cycles capped by deepwater cycles
  • Low Gr throughout

(after Dutton, 2004)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com