I'Overview of international trade - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

I'Overview of international trade

Description:

International Trade & Exchange Part II ... This combination makes the defense of free trade as close to a sacred tenet as ... Tariffs: a tax on imports ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: chr98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: I'Overview of international trade


1
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Department of
Humanities Social Sciences / K. Christ SL 151,
Principles of Economics
Student Notes 15 International Trade Exchange
Part II
  • I. Overview of international trade
  • Pattern of trade
  • Balance of payments
  • Motivation for trade Ricardian trade
  • Comparative advantage
  • Terms of trade
  • III. International balances, exchange rates, and
    adjustment
  • IV. The political economy of international trade
    part 1
  • Justifications of protectionism
  • Traditional welfare analysis of trade
    restrictions
  • V. The political economy of international trade
    part 2
  • Historical perspectives and international
    institutions
  • The anti-globalization backlash

2
Political Economy of International Trade
If there were an Economists Creed, it would
surely contain the affirmations I understand the
Principle of Comparative Advantage and I
advocate Free Trade. For one hundred seventy
years, the appreciation that international trade
benefits a country whether it is fair or not
has been one of the touchstones of
professionalism in economics. Comparative
advantage is not just an idea both simple and
profound it is an idea that conflicts directly
with both stubborn popular prejudices and
powerful interests. This combination makes the
defense of free trade as close to a sacred tenet
as any idea in economics. Paul Krugman, Is Free
Trade Passé?, Journal of Economic Perspectives 1
(Fall 1987), 131 144.
Paul Krugman
3
Political Economy of International Trade
Common justifications for rejection of free trade
/ adoption of protection
  • National security
  • National identity
  • Environmental concerns
  • Labor standards concerns
  • Protection of certain industries
  • Industries that are just getting started (the
    infant industry argument)
  • Industries that are subject to unfair competition
    (anti-dumping measures)
  • To gain a strategic advantage / capture a market

4
Political Economy of International Trade
Tools of Protection and/or Methods of managing
trade
  • Tariffs a tax on imports
  • Quotas a legal restriction on the amount of a
    good coming into the country
  • Anti-dumping duties
  • Export Subsidies the opposite of a tariff
  • Countervailing duties
  • Non-tariff barriers barriers to trade that
    result from regulatory actions
  • Exchange rate policies

5
Political Economy of International Trade
Welfare Analysis of Tariffs (and Quotas)
Country 1
Country 2
P
P
P
S
XS
S
MD
D
D
6
Political Economy of International Trade
Welfare Analysis of Tariffs (and Quotas)
7
Political Economy of International Trade
Welfare Analysis of Tariffs (and Quotas)
P
8
Political Economy of International Trade
Welfare Analysis of Tariffs (and Quotas)
P
9
Political Economy of International Trade
Welfare Analysis of Tariffs (and Quotas)
P
10
Political Economy of International Trade
Welfare Analysis of Tariffs (and Quotas)
P
11
Political Economy of International Trade
Welfare Analysis of Tariffs (and Quotas)
P
A B C D E
12
Political Economy of International Trade
History of the Political Economy of Trade The
First Era of Globalization
  • 1776 Smiths Wealth of Nations argues
    eloquently against mercantilist approaches, and
    in favor of free trade.
  • 1818 Ricardos Principles of Political Economy
    and Taxation introduces the concept of
    comparative advantage into the economic arguments
    in favor of free trade.
  • 1840s Corn law debates in the U.K. lead to
    the unilateral adoption of free trade by Great
    Britain.
  • Late 1800s Remarkable expansion of world trade.
  • 1900-1914 Culmination of this period of
    globalization (widespread trade liberalization
    and an amazing amount of labor migration).

13
Political Economy of International Trade
History of the Political Economy of Trade
Breakdown of World Trade
  • 1914-1920 World War I breaks down the
    international trading system.
  • 1921-1930 Uneven recovery (robust in the U.S.,
    less so elsewhere) only partially restores
    international trade to pre-war level.
  • 1930-1945 The Great Depression and World War II
    seriously damage the international trading system
  • Smoot Hawley tariff (June 1930) was a high water
    mark of U.S. protectionism.
  • Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (1934)
    represented a step back in the direction of
    managed trade.
  • Overall, world trade declined by some 66 between
    1929 and 1934.

14
Political Economy of International Trade
History of the Political Economy of Trade
Bretton Woods
  • July 1944 Delegates from 44 nations gather at
    Bretton Woods, a small resort town in New
    Hampshire to deliberate upon and agree to a
    system of rules and international institutions
    for governing commercial and financial relations
    among the major industrial states.
  • Delegates committed themselves to the gradual
    reduction of trade barriers.
  • Chief features of the Bretton Woods international
    financial system
  • An obligation for each country to maintain its
    exchange rate within a fixed valueplus or minus
    one percent.
  • The provision of emergency international finance
    to bridge temporary payments imbalances.

15
Political Economy of International Trade
History of the Political Economy of Trade Road
to the WTO
  • Key institutions of the Bretton-Woods system
  • The International Monetary Fund (to provide
    financing to countries experiencing balance of
    payments imbalances).
  • The World Bank (to orchestrate development
    assistance).
  • A third key institution an international trade
    organization did not become a reality until
    1995
  • Between the late 1940s and 1994, the General
    Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) evolved
    through successive rounds to lower trade barriers
    and move slowly toward realization of the WTO.
  • In 1995, GATT gave way to the WTO.

16
Political Economy of International Trade
History of the Political Economy of Trade GATT
and Post-War Trade
  • Main constraints of GATT on domestic trade
    policy
  • Forbade the use of export subsidies, except in
    the area of agricultural goods (an exception
    promoted by the U.S. and the EU).
  • Limited the use of import quotas to the case of
    domestic market disruptions.
  • Limited the use of tariffs by requiring that new
    tariffs be offset by barrier reductions in other
    areas.
  • Last phases of GATT focused on trade
    liberalization in agriculture and textiles, and
    the movement toward the creation of the WTO.

17
Political Economy of International Trade
History of the Political Economy of Trade Key
International Institutions of the World Trading
System
  • The International Monetary Fund (IMF, 1945)
  • Monitors economic and financial developments and
    policies in member countries and at the global
    level, and provides policy advice to its members.
  • Lends to member countries with balance of
    payments problems.
  • Provides governments and central banks of its
    member countries with technical assistance.
  • The World Bank (1945). The "World Bank" is the
    name that has come to be used for the
    International Bank for Reconstruction and
    Development (IBRD) and the International
    Development Association (IDA). A specialized
    United Nations agency that provides low-interest
    loans, interest-free credit, and grants to
    developing countries, under the assumption that
    infrastructure, education, and healthcare are
    fundamental to economic growth.
  • The World Trade Organization (WTO, 1994-1995)
    The only global international organization
    dealing with the rules of trade between nations.
    An important part of its mission includes
    mechanisms for dispute resolution between
    countries so that retaliatory trade policies and
    trade wars do not disrupt the flow of goods and
    services among nations.

18
Political Economy of International Trade
The Political Economy of Trade
  • Trade liberalization increases the output and
    national incomes of trading countries. (The
    gains from trade argument.)
  • Trade liberalization creates winners and losers.
  • If the overall gains from trade liberalization
    are positive, the gains to winners must more than
    offset the losses to losers hence, most
    economists generally view free trade agreements
    as good (or Pareto imroving).
  • Generally, economists suggest that the losers
    from free trade agreements (workers who become
    unemployed) can (and should) be compensated (with
    retraining subsidies, for example). The
    implementing legislation for NAFTA provided for
    such indirect compensation via sidebar
    agreements.

19
Political Economy of International Trade
The Political Economy of Trade
  • Trade liberalization can hurt key constituencies,
    which often are well organized and have
    significant political power.
  • Winners from trade liberalization often are
    harder to identify than losers
  • A person who loses a job when the plant they work
    for moves to a different country can easily
    attribute their loss to the movement toward freer
    trade.
  • People who are hired because of an increase in
    exports may not see the link between their job
    and trade liberalization.
  • People who are hired because of higher national
    incomes usually do not attribute their hiring to
    free trade policies.
  • People who purchase goods whose price has fallen
    due to trade liberalization are not usually
    conscious of the price effect, or if they are,
    may not give credit to trade liberalization.
  • Those who have gained from trade liberalization
    have tended to be people who are educated and
    highly skilled.
  • Those who have lost due to trade liberalization
    have tended to be in manufacturing and/or people
    who have little education.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com