Case Study Comparisons: Gaining Efficient Distribution Flow - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Case Study Comparisons: Gaining Efficient Distribution Flow

Description:

This company removed entire conveyor system, accumulator and High Speed Palletizer ... Accumulator. Requirements. None If Handles. Multiple Pallets. Very Large ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: steve162
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Case Study Comparisons: Gaining Efficient Distribution Flow


1
Case Study Comparisons Gaining Efficient
Distribution Flow
  • Professor Steve Derby
  • Flexible Manufacturing Center
  • Mechanical Engineering Department
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Troy, NY 12180
  • 518-276-6991 518-276-2623 Fax
    derbys_at_rpi.edu

2
How Does Your Factory Flow ?
  • Raw materials or components enter production line
  • Finished goods in boxes or shrink wrap need to be
    shipped to the customer
  • Required operations but want to minimize cost
  • Customer does not see difference

3
Factory Flow IS Distribution
  • Within the Factory, one finds
  • Kanbans
  • JIT
  • RF tracking
  • But these may not assess the method of how the
    production output is routed and shipped

4
Production Output Palletized
  • Majority of products are palletized for shipping
  • Much is done manually
  • High Speed Palletizers have been around for
    decades
  • Much has been written about the benefits of High
    Speed Palletizers

5
High Speed Palletizers
  • Make tremendous sense when producing great
    volumes of one product i.e. Corn Flakes
  • A solution for production volume when big in
    number and/or in physical size
  • May be dedicated to one line

6
Palletizers
  • But what if the product is smaller?
  • Seemingly fast production rates yield only
    moderate number of boxes
  • Single line does not need high speed palletizer

7
Case Study 1 Factory Floor
End of line
8
Case Study 1
  • Each line does not warrant its own High Speed
    Palletizer
  • 6 lines personal care goods
  • Company implemented a conveyor system leading to
    second floor
  • Accumulated 1 pallet load for each line and then
    routed to High Speed Palletizer

9
Conveyor System
To Second Floor
End of line
10
Case Study 1
  • This company removed entire conveyor system,
    accumulator and High Speed Palletizer
  • Now has 1 person at the end of each line manually
    stacking boxes
  • Forklift comes through plant to get filled pallets

11
Current Factory Floor
Forklift path
12
Case Study 1
  • Could use smaller palletizers at the end of each
    line
  • Sizes and types of palletizer options explored
    later
  • Forklift could be replaced by AGVs or pallet
    highway, but currently not implemented

13
Case Study 2 Factory Floor
Accumulators
Wall
End of line
Palletizer
14
Case Study 2
  • Each line does not warrant its own High Speed
    Palletizer
  • 14 lines paper goods
  • Company implemented a conveyor system leading to
    second room
  • Accumulated 1 pallet load for each line and then
    routed to High Speed Palletizer

15
Current Factory Floor
Wall
End of line
Forklift path
16
Case Study 2
  • Company removed accumulators and High Speed
    Palletizer
  • Now has 6-8 people in the conveyor loop manually
    stacking boxes
  • Forklift comes to conveyor loop to get filled
    pallets
  • Floor space savings
  • Could use pallet highway

17
Proposed Factory Floor
Wall
End of line
Forklift path
18
Case Study 2
  • This company is looking to use many smaller
    palletizers
  • Upgrade to current manual setup would be minimal
  • Not worth savings to place palletizers at end of
    lines due to lack of floor space

19
Palletizing Options
  • Manual
  • Robotic
  • Layer Forming
  • High Speed
  • Lower Cost

20
Manual
  • Still the easiest to implement even if not cost
    effective
  • Huge number of companies still do this
  • Worker injury issues

21
Robotic
  • Best for mixed case loads
  • Can handle different products

Columbia/Okura
Samsung
22
Layer Forming
  • Range of box rates

Columbia
23
High Speed
  • Can really fly

Kettner
Kettner Dual Head
24
Lower Cost
  • Some handle more than 1 pallet

Priority One
Stackbot
25
Case Study Possibilities
  • Some lower cost palletizers handle more than 1
    pallet
  • Not a big transfer rate
  • Need to look at tradeoffs and costs
  • Will look at Manual vs. Centralized Vs.
    Distributed

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Case Study 1 Possibilities
  • Robotic most likely too costly
  • Lower end Layer Forming, though it takes floor
    space and cost
  • Stackbot at end of each line is good

30
Case Study 2 Possibilities
  • Robotic could be used to handle several pallets
    worth if sufficient reach
  • Priority One system good if rework conveyor loop
  • Stackbot for each pair of pallets is good

31
Conclusions
  • Efficient Distribution Flow a product of many
    factors
  • New factory or old
  • Product size
  • Production rate
  • Available floor space

32
Conclusions
  • Distributed Palletizing may be a viable option
    that might not be the first guess
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com