Experimental Design: One-Way Correlated Samples Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Experimental Design: One-Way Correlated Samples Design

Description:

... in one group (condition) is paired with a score in the other group(s) (condition ... A priori specific comparison test. Does not require significant F ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: uca9
Learn more at: https://faculty.uca.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Experimental Design: One-Way Correlated Samples Design


1
Chapter 12
  • Experimental Design One-Way Correlated Samples
    Design

2
Experimental Design One-Way Correlated Samples
Design
  • Advantages and limitations
  • Comparing two groups
  • Comparing t-test to ANOVA
  • Comparing more than two groups

3
Advantages and limitations
  • One-way correlated samples
  • One-way 1 IV
  • Correlated samples no random assignment
  • Each score in one group (condition) is paired
    with a score in the other group(s) (condition(s))
  • Advantages
  • Can reduce systematic error (confounding)
  • Can reduce random error (due to indiv diff)
  • Limitations
  • Creating pairs of participant scores may be
    difficult
  • Repeated measurements can create methodological
    concerns

4
Advantages and limitations
  • Natural pairs
  • Participants scores paired for some natural
    reason
  • Matched pairs
  • Participants scores paired because researcher
    matches them on some variable
  • Repeated measures
  • Participants scores paired because they come
    from the same participants
  • Objective is to reduce sources of extraneous
    variability

5
Advantages and limitations
  • Advantages of repeated measures design
  • Controls EVs due to individual differences
  • Requires fewer participants
  • Appropriate for studying questions that involve
    repeated exposure/testing
  • Appropriate for longitudinal research

6
Advantages and limitations
  • Methodological issues of repeated measures design
  • Carryover effects
  • Transient
  • Permanent
  • Sensitization
  • Carryover effects can often be controlled by
  • Randomized order of conditions
  • counterbalancing

7
Advantages and limitations
  • Comparing repeated measures design to independent
    samples design
  • Effect on random error and inferential statistic
  • Effect on degrees of freedom
  • Consider the net effect

8
Comparing two groups
  • Random sampling
  • Paired assignment to 2 groups (conditions)
  • 1 IV with 2 levels
  • Lets try an experiment involving the Stroop
    effect
  • Go to the following website
  • http//faculty.washington.edu/chudler/java/ready.h
    tml

9
Comparing two groups
  • variability within groups (error variability)
    random error (extraneous variables)
  • variability between groups systematic error
    (confounds) systematic variability (effect of
    IV)
  • Goals
  • Reduce random error
  • Eliminate systematic error
  • Maximize systematic variability through
    manipulation of IV

10
Comparing t-test to ANOVA
  • Correlated samples t-test
  • Limited to 2 groups
  • Independent samples Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
  • 2 or more groups
  • Both parametric tests
  • Require assumptions of
  • Normality
  • Homogeneity of variance

11
Comparing t-test to ANOVA
  • Correlated samples t-test
  • difference between the 2 group means
  • t ----------------------------------------------
    ------------
  • standard error of the difference
    between means
  • t values when null hypothesis is true
  • t values when null hypothesis is false
  • Larger the t (pos or neg), the lower the
    probability that the difference is simply due to
    chance
  • Alpha level and decision-making

12
Comparing t-test to ANOVA
  • Correlated samples ANOVA
  • variability between the two groups
  • F ----------------------------------------------
    ------------
  • error variability
  • F values when null hypothesis is true
  • F values when null hypothesis is false
  • Larger the F, the lower the probability that the
    difference is simply due to chance
  • Alpha level and decision-making

13
Comparing more than 2 groups
  • Addition of groups often clarifies relationship
    between IV and DV
  • ANOVA to determine effect
  • A priori specific comparison test
  • Does not require significant F
  • post hoc specific comparison test
  • Does require significant F

14
Summary
  • Correlated samples design
  • Random sampling
  • Paired assignment
  • Natural pairs
  • Matched pairs
  • Repeated measures
  • Paired assignment designed to reduce random error
  • Manipulation of IV
  • Analyzed with t-test or ANOVA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com