Title: Welfare Analysis
1Welfare Analysis
2Agenda
- Welfare Economics and Analysis Defined
- Positive Versus Normative Economics
- Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) Welfare Measures
- Pareto Optimality
- Edgeworth-Bowley and Pareto Optimum
- First and Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare
3Agenda Cont.
- Measuring Consumer and Producer Welfare
- Graphical Welfare Analysis
4Welfare Economics
- Its a branch of economics that examines resource
allocation and the policies that govern these
allocation in terms of societal and/or individual
costs and benefits. - One of its objective is to help society make
better decisions that maximizes its well-being.
5Welfare Analysis
- It is a method used to analyze different resource
allocations and how these allocations affect
different groups. - It is meant to answer the following questions
- Is an allocation of resources economically
efficient? - What effect does a particular resource allocation
have on different groups?
6Positive Economics
- This branch of economics focuses on predicting
behavior of economic agents by using a set of
axioms or assumptions. - Positive economics objectively tries to answer
what will happen given a set of economic
circumstances. - It concerns itself with what is.
- E.g., What happens to price and quantity if you
put a per unit tax on it?
7Normative Economics
- It is a branch of economics that incorporates
value judgments in the analysis of resource
allocation. - It focuses on what should be.
- What should be the appropriate policy?
- What should the economy be like?
- Welfare economics tends to fall under normative
economics in terms of analysis. - E.g., What is the best policy to help producers
due to a freeze that damaged a majority of their
crop?
8Positive Versus Normative Economics
- The key difference between positive and normative
economics is that the assumptions that Positive
Economics rely upon tend to have no morality or
ethical implications, while the assumptions of
Normative Economics have some sort of value
judgment as their basis.
9Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) Welfare Measures
- There are two primary ways of measuring welfare
changes due to a change in a policy. - Compensating Variation
- Equivalent Variation
- The difference between the two is dependent upon
whether a change occurs or not.
10Compensating Variation
- This compensation represents the amount of money
taken away from an individual/firm after an
economic change that leaves the individual/firm
just as well off as before the change occurred. - Welfare gains implies that this amount represents
the maximum amount that the individual/firm would
be willing-to-pay for the change to occur. - Welfare losses imply that this amount is the
negative of the minimum amount that a
individual/firm would require as compensation for
the change to occur.
11Equivalent Variation
- This compensation represents the amount of money
paid to an individual/firm which, if an economic
change does not happen, leaves the individual
just as well off as if the change occurred. - If a welfare gain would occur, it is the minimum
compensation that the person would need to forgo
the change to occur. - If a welfare loss would occur, it is the negative
of the maximum amount that the individual/firm
would be willing to pay to avoid the change to
occur.
12Pareto Optimality
- A resource allocation is said to be Pareto
optimal if there is no reallocation of resources
that can make one person better-off with out
harming some other person. - A Pareto optimal allocation does not have to be
unique and may even be judged unfair. - Pareto optimality usually is the preferred
criterion for economist when practicing normative
economics.
13More on Pareto
- A Pareto improvement is said to exist if you can
reallocate resources and make at least one person
better-off without harming any other person. - A Pareto dominated allocation of resources is an
allocation where a transfer of resources will
make at least one person better-off without
harming another.
14Examining Pareto Optimum
Consumer B
Consumer A
x2
x2
UB
UA
x1
x1
15Edgeworth-Bowley Box
- An Edgeworth-Bowley Box allows you to represent
two consumers and there decisions in a single
graph. - It represents two different consumers consumption
of two different goods and the corresponding
utility of each.
16Edgeworth-Bowley Box Example
x2A
Consumer B
OB
x1B
UB
UA
x1A
OA
x2B
Consumer A
17Edgeworth-Bowley Box and Pareto
- Suppose Consumer A and B can consume wheat and
chickens. - Assume that Consumer A has 180 bushels of wheat
and 5 chickens. - Assume that Consumer B has 20 bushels of wheat
and 15 chickens. - Call Consumer A and B initial allocations
endowment 1. - Let UA and UB represent respectively A and Bs
initial indifference curves that intersect with
endowment 1. - Can either producer be made better-off through
reallocation of goods.
18Edgeworth-Bowley Box and Pareto Cont.
WheatA
Consumer B
ChickensB
15
OB
UB
20
Endowment 1
180
Endowment 2
Contract Curve
Endowment 3
UA
ChickensA
OA
5
WheatB
Consumer A
19Edgeworth-Bowley Box and Pareto Cont.
- Endowment 1 represents a Pareto dominated
allocation. - Endowment 2 represents a Pareto improvement
allocation. - Endowment 3 represents a Pareto optimum
allocation. - The Contract Curve represents all of the Pareto
optimal allocations.
20First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare
- This theorem states that under the competitive
setting market economies will achieve a Pareto
optimal point as long as consumers maximize
utility and producers maximize profits.
21Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare
- Any Pareto optimum allocation can be sustained by
perfect competition with a suitable lump-sum
transfer of resources.
22Measuring Producers Welfare
- There are two primary ways to measure the welfare
of producers - Profit (p)
- ?TR TVC TFC
- Quasirent/Producer Surplus (PS)
- PS TR TVC ? TFC
- Note In general the compensating and equivalent
variation is the same for both measures.
23Profit, Quasirent, and Producer Surplus
Graphically
P
MC
P1
ATC
A
AVC
PATC
B
PAVC
Q
Area A Profit Area A Area B
Quasirent/Producer Surplus
24Why use producer surplus over profit as a welfare
measure?
- Profit tends to underestimate the benefit to the
producer because it does not take into account
the benefit of producing even though the producer
may be making a loss but minimizing that loss by
still producing.
25Measuring Consumer Welfare
- Since a persons utility is not directly
observable, a proxy for their utility is
necessary. - One such proxy is consumer surplus which is the
area under their demand curve and above the price
paid. - There are many complex aspects to consider about
measuring consumer welfare because the
compensating and equivalent variations tend not
to be the same. - Due to these complexities, we will assume that
consumer surplus is a good enough measure relying
on work done by Willig (1976).
26Consumer Surplus Graphically
P
A
P0
Demand
Q
Area A Consumer Surplus
27Graphical Welfare Analysis Steps
- Step 1 Set-up an original supply and demand
scenario for the policy being examined - Step 2 Graphically determine the initial
equilibrium price, equilibrium quantity,
producers surplus (PS), and consumers surplus
(CS) - Step 3 Analyze how the policy will affect
consumer price and/or demand and demonstrate it
on the graph - Step 4 Break-up the graph using the initial and
new prices and quantities
28Graphical Welfare Analysis Steps Cont.
- Step 5 Calculate the new producer and consumer
surpluses - Step 6 Sum up the change in areas of producer
and consumer surplus changes - Step 7 Calculate any taxpayer gains or losses if
appropriate - Step 8 Calculate the total welfare change due to
the policy
29Welfare Analysis of Technological Change
- Suppose you have a change in technology that
causes you supply curve to rotate clockwise from
its intersection with the price axis. - E.g., Government sets a policy to allow biotech
research - Define the following
- S0 is the original supply curve
- S1 is the new supply curve
- D is the demand curve
- p0,q0 is the initial quantity and price
equilibrium - p1,q1 is the new quantity and price equilibrium
30Graphical Welfare Analysis of Technological Change
P
S0
a
p0
S1
b
d
c
p1
g
e
f
D
q1
q0
Q
Change in PS fg-b
Change in CS bcd
Change in TS cdfg
31Summary of Results for Technological Change
- Consumers definitely gain under this situation
- Producers will gain if areas f g gt area b
- Producers will lose if areas f g lt area b
- Total surplus increases
32Welfare Analysis of a Quota or Market Rationing
- Suppose the government decides to subsidize a
particular commodity to help producers. - Define the following
- S is the supply curve
- D is the demand curve
- q1 is the quota set by the government
- p0,q0 is the initial quantity and price
equilibrium - p1 is the price that producers are willing to
supply at q1 - p2 is the price that consumers pay at q2
33Graphical Welfare Analysis of a Quota or Market
Rationing
P
S
a
p2
b
c
p0
e
d
p1
f
D
q0
q1
Q
Change in PS b e
Change in TS c e
Change in CS b c
34Summary of Results for a Quota or Market Rationing
- Consumers definitely lose under this situation
- Producers gain if area b gt area e
- Producers lose if area b lt area e
- Total surplus decreases by area c e
35Welfare Analysis of a Price Ceiling
- Suppose you have a policy that requires a price
ceiling, i.e., a maximum price that can be
charged for a good. - E.g., Government sets a price ceiling on how much
can be paid for a staple good like milk. - Define the following
- S is the supply curve
- D is the demand curve
- p0,q0 is the initial quantity and price
equilibrium - p1 is the new price given the ceiling
- p2 is the price that consumers would be willing
to pay for output q1 - q1 is the quantity supplied by producers at the
price ceiling - q2 is the quantity demanded by consumers at the
price ceiling
36Graphical Welfare Analysis of a Price Ceiling
P
S
a
p2
b
c
p0
d
e
f
g
p1
h
D
q0
q1
q2
Q
Change in PS - d - e
Change in TS -c- e
Change in CS d c
37Summary of Results for Price Ceiling
- Producers definitely lose under this situation
- Consumers will gain if area d gt area c
- Consumers will lose if area d lt area c
- Total surplus decreases
- q2 q1 represents the excess demand for the
product with a price ceiling
38Welfare Analysis of a Price Floor
- Suppose you have a policy that requires a price
floor, i.e., a minimum price that can be charged
for a good. - E.g., Government sets a price floor for what a
producer can get for a commodity. - Define the following
- S is the supply curve
- D is the demand curve
- p0,q0 is the initial quantity and price
equilibrium - p1 is the new price given the floor
- p2 is the price that producers would be willing
to sell output q1 - q1 is the quantity demanded by consumers at the
price floor - q2 is the quantity supplied by producers at the
price floor
39Graphical Welfare Analysis of a Price Floor
P
S
a
p1
b
d
c
p0
f
e
g
h
p2
D
q0
q1
q2
Q
Change in PS b f
Change in TS -c- f
Change in CS b c
40Summary of Results for Price Floor
- Consumers definitely lose under this situation
- Producers will gain if area b gt area f
- Producers will lose if area b lt area f
- Total surplus decreases
- q2 q1 represents the excess supply for the
product with a price floor
41Welfare Analysis of a Price Support
- Suppose you have a price support policy where the
government buys the surplus. - E.g., Government sets a price support for corn.
- Define the following
- S is the supply curve
- D is the demand curve
- p0,q0 is the initial quantity and price
equilibrium - p1 is the new price given the price support
- p2 is the price that producers would be willing
to sell output q1 - q1 is the quantity demanded by consumers at the
price support - q2 is the quantity supplied by producers at the
price support
42Graphical Welfare Analysis of a Price Support
P
S
a
p1
b
d
c
p0
i
f
e
g
h
p2
j
l
k
D
q0
q1
q2
Q
Change in PS b c d
Change in TS d
Change in CS b c
Tax Payers Cost c d f g h i k l
43Summary of Results for Price Support
- Consumers definitely lose under this situation
- Producers will gain areas b c d
- Total surplus increases to d at a large taxpayer
expense - The taxpayer expense may not be a sunk cost
because they could sell the surplus production to
foreign countries or save it for low yield years.
44Welfare Analysis of an Ad Valorem Tax
- Suppose the government decides to put an ad
valorem tax, i.e., a tax paid per unit of
quantity, on cigarettes. - Define the following
- S is the supply curve
- D is the demand curve
- D1 is the new demand curve faced by consumers
- t is the tax
- p0,q0 is the initial quantity and price
equilibrium - p1 is the new price that producers receive after
the tax - p2 is the price that consumers pay with the tax
- The difference between p1 and p2 is the tax
- q1 is the quantity demanded by consumers and
supplied by producers
45Graphical Welfare Analysis of an Ad Valorem Tax
P
S
t
a
p2
c
b
d
p0
f
g
e
p1
h
D1
D
q0
q1
Q
Change in PS e f g
Change in TS d g
Change in CS b c d
Tax Payers gain b c e f
46Summary of Results for an Ad Valorem Tax
- Consumers and producers definitely lose under
this situation - The taxpayer gains areas b c g f in tax
revenue. - Total surplus decreases by areas b
47Welfare Analysis of a Subsidy to Consumers
- Suppose the government decides to subsidize a
particular commodity to help producers. - Define the following
- S is the supply curve
- D is the demand curve
- D1 is the new demand curve faced by consumers
- s is the subsidy
- p0,q0 is the initial quantity and price
equilibrium - p1 is the new price that producers receive after
the tax - p2 is the price that consumers pay with the tax
- The difference between p1 and p2 is the tax
- q1 is the quantity demanded by consumers and
supplied by producers
48Graphical Welfare Analysis of a Subsidy to
Consumers
P
s
S
a
p2
c
b
d
p0
e
g
f
p1
h
D1
D
q0
q1
Q
Change in PS b c
Change in TS d
Change in CS e f g
Tax Payers lose b c d e f g
49Summary of Results for a Subsidy to Consumers
- Consumers and producers definitely gain under
this situation - The taxpayer lose areas b c d e f g in
tax revenue. - Total surplus decreases by area d
50Notes on Welfare Analysis
- Many different policies can be used to achieve
the same goal. - The key to policy welfare analysis is to
understand how each party is affected by each
policy. - While not done at this point comparative welfare
analysis of different policies can be done using
a single graph.