Saif Benjaafar, University of Minnesota - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Saif Benjaafar, University of Minnesota

Description:

Editor in Chief or Department Editor makes an initial ... DE and AE can arbitrate but referees (current/new ones) must concur. Risks for your reputation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: candac47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Saif Benjaafar, University of Minnesota


1
Saif Benjaafar, University of Minnesota
  • Department Editor, IIE Transactions
  • Editorial Board, MSOM
  • Associate Editor, IEEE Transactions on Automation
    Science and Engineering
  • Associate Editor, IJFMS
  • Associate Editor, JMS

2
The Review Process
  • Editor in Chief or Department Editor makes an
    initial assessment of fit
  • Associate Editor makes an initial assessment of
    contribution
  • 2 or more referees provide detailed reviews
  • Associate Editor summarizes referee reports and
    provides additional comments
  • Department Editor communicates review decision

3
Length of Review
  • 3 to 6 months but also up to one year more
  • Submit and check status online
  • Allow for sufficient time before communicating
    with Editor (but do it after 6 months)

4
The Review Decision
  • Accept
  • Minor revision
  • Major revision
  • Reject

5
Handling the Revision
  • Read reviews carefully (and read between the
    lines)
  • Thoroughly and comprehensively responds to all
    review comments
  • You may disagree with reviewers, but do not argue
    with them
  • Resubmit revised manuscript careful summary of
    responses be grateful for the feedback

6
Handling Rejections
  • Papers are rejected for
  • lack of fit
  • lack of contribution
  • incorrectness
  • incompleteness
  • poor presentation
  • poor writing

7
Handling Rejections
  • Take advantage of the feedback to move ahead with
    your research
  • Modify your paper and resubmit elsewhere
  • Insights into standards and expectations at
    various journals

8
Handling Differences of Opinion
  • Disagreements about accuracy are easiest to
    resolve
  • Disagreements about contribution are the most
    difficult to resolve
  • DE and AE can arbitrate but referees (current/new
    ones) must concur
  • Risks for your reputation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com