Title: The Effect of Solar Gravitational Potential On GPS Clocks
1The Effect of Solar Gravitational PotentialOn
GPS Clocks
- This presentation will probably involve audience
discussion, which will create action items. Use
PowerPoint to keep track of these action items
during your presentation - In Slide Show, click on the right mouse button
- Select Meeting Minder
- Select the Action Items tab
- Type in action items as they come up
- Click OK to dismiss this box
- This will automatically create an Action Item
slide at the end of your presentation with your
points entered.
- Tom Van Flandern Thomas B. Bahder
- Army Research Laboratory
- PAWG, Colorado Springs
- 1998 August 19
- (last two slides updated 2002 March 30)
2What affects clock rates?
- SR motion slows clocks by the factor (t
ypically lt 10-8) - GR gravitational potential slows clocks by the
factor (typically ? 10-8) - N.B. neglected (?10-16)
3GPS satellite clock rates (ns/day)
- Orbital speed slowing 7,200
- Gravitational potential slowing at GPS orbital
altitude 14,400 - Gravitational potential slowing on Earths
geoid 60,300 - Net GPS satellites run faster than clocks on
geoid by 38,700
4Question Why is solar potential effect not
included in GPS?
- Predicted effect 12-ns amplitude, 12-hour period
- GPS raw pseudo-ranges show unexplained 12-hour
periods correlated with Sun direction - Hoffman (1963) Clocks in freefall should show
no effect. But counter-examples exist.
5What does not affect clock rates?
- Cyclotron experiments with meson decay times show
that acceleration as such does not affect clock
rates even at 1019 g. - F m a and equivalence principle If
acceleration does not affect clocks,
gravitational force cannot either.
6Inside a uniform spherical shell, force is zero,
potential is constant, clocks slow
Alley experiment speed altitude affect clocks,
but not acceleration (e.g. when plane circles)
7Fixed and accelerating clocks with same speed and
height tick at same rates
Suspension/free fall doesnt affect clock rates
8Compared to pole, clocks on equator slow due to
higher rotation speed, but speed up due to weaker
gravitational potential. These effects
cancel.
Result All clocks at sea level tick at the same
rate!
9Satellite clocks tick slower than clocks at
infinity because speed and potential effects
accumulate.
Also, as satellite falls toward perigee,
potential gets stronger and speed increases.
Again, the two clock-slowing effects accumulate.
10As Earth and satellite fall toward perihelion,
all their clocks slow in unison relative to
distant pulsar clocks. The two slowing effects
accumulate.
11But as the satellite orbits, do the two
clock-slowing effects from gravitational
potential and velocity in the Suns field cancel
or accumulate?
predicted amplitude of solar potential effect 12
ns (3.6m)
To Sun
12Or if Earth is not present but the satellite
follows the same path as before using rocket
propulsion, do the two solar clock-slowing
effects cancel or accumulate?
predicted amplitude of solar potential effect 12
ns (3.6m)
To Sun
13Alley experiment Clocks flown over south pole to
New Zealand South pole in winter was always
farther from Sun than Earth center
No effect of Suns potential was seen.
14Solar clock-slowing computation
- Suns potential at Earths surface is 14 x
stronger than Earths potential. - Mathematica applied to GR metric equation to
compute satellite proper time in Suns field for
any orbit. - Lorentz transformation applied to convert from
SSB coordinate time to ECI coordinate time. - Result potential and velocity effects from Sun
on Earth-satellite cancel!
15A
Explanation As Earth orbits Sun (center path),
aphelion satellite positions must travel at
higher speed to get from A to B, and perihelion
satellite positions must travel at slower speed
to get from C to D.
C
D
B
This centripetal potential is speed difference
added by Suns presence.
16Summary of clock-slowing effects
?Motion free ?Motion forced
17Conclusions
- Solar potential effect does not exist in GPS
data motion is forced - Unexplained 12-hour periods correlated with Sun
direction must have some other explanation - No unresolved relativity issues remain at the
1-meter level for GPS