A1258150782wHfiX - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 113
About This Presentation
Title:

A1258150782wHfiX

Description:

... of students and teachers, inter alia by encouraging the academic recognition ... inter-institutional cooperation, mobility schemes and integrated programmes of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 114
Provided by: pc75198
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A1258150782wHfiX


1
OFICINA 2 - QUALIDADE NOS INTERCÂMBIOS
INTERNACIONAIS DUPLOS DIPLOMAS E DIPLOMAS
CONJUNTOS
Giancarlo Spinelli
XX Reunião Anual do FAUBAI 15 a 18 de abril de
2008
2
The implementation of the Bologna Process at the
university level
B) Highly integrated programs joint and double
degrees
C) Is it possible to measure success and/or
quality?
3
May 2004
January 2007
1957
2009
?
4
MAASTRICHT TREATY - 7 FEBRUARY 1992
  • Article 126
  • ..
  • Community action shall be aimed at
  • developing the European dimension in education,
    particularly through the teaching and
    dissemination of the languages of the Member
    States
  • encouraging mobility of students and teachers,
    inter alia by encouraging the academic
    recognition of diplomas and periods of study
  • promoting cooperation between educational
    establishments
  • developing exchanges of information and
    experience on issues common to the education
    systems of the Member States
  • encouraging the development of youth exchanges
    and of exchanges of socio- educational
    instructors
  • encouraging the development of distance education.

5
MAASTRICHT TREATY - 7 FEBRUARY 1992
MAASTRICHT TREATY - 7 FEBRUARY 1992
Article 127 4. The Council, acting in
accordance with the procedure referred to in
Article 189c and after consulting the Economic
and Social Committee, shall adopt measures to
contribute to the achievement of the objectives
referred to in this Article, excluding any
harmonization of the laws and regulations of the
Member States.
6
DURATION OF STUDIES BEFORE ENTERING UNIVERSITY
7
4 Countries
30 Countries
33 Countries
8
(No Transcript)
9
2009 - Leuven
2010
2010
10
BOLOGNA FOLLOW-UP GROUP
Among other actions promotes workshops to be
organized by national ministries. They contribute
on specific topics of interest for the next
communiqué.
11
EUAEUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITIES
March 29-30, 2001 Salamanca Convention The
Bologna Process and the European Higher
Education Area.
May 29-31, 2003 - Graz Convention Forward from
Berlin the Role of the Universities.
March 31-April 2, 2005 - Glasgow Convention
Strong Universities for a Strong Europe.
March 29-31, 2007 - Lisbon Convention Europe's
universities beyond 2010 - diversity with a
common purpose.
12
UNIVERSITIES SHAPING THE EUROPEAN HIGHER
EDUCATION AREA
TRENDS V 2007
  • http//www.eua.be

13
(The information network on education in Europe)
EURYDICE2006/07
  • Focus on the structure of higher education in
    Europe. National trends in the Bologna Process

http//www.eurydice.org
14
ASSOCIATIONS
Example in engineering

SEFI (Société Européenne pour la Formation des
Ingénieurs)
CESAER (Conference of European Schools for
Advanced Engineering Education and Research)
15
BOLOGNA DECLARATION (1999)Aimed at creating a
European Higher Education Area (EHEA)
  • Adoption of a system of easily readable and
    comparable degrees
  • Adoption of a system essentially based on two
    main cycles
  • Establishment of a system of credits
  • Promotion of mobility
  • Promotion of European cooperation in quality
    assurance
  • Promotion of European dimensions in higher
    education

16
EHEA
European Higher Education Area
17
PRAGUE COMMUNIQUÉ (2001)
  • Actions following the six objectives of the
    Bologna Process
  • Furthermore
  • Lifelong learning
  • Higher education institutions and students
  • Promoting the attractiveness of the European
    Higher Education Area
  • Continued follow-up

18
BERLIN COMMUNIQUÉ (2003)
  • Additional actions
  • European Higher Education Area and European
    Research Area two pillars of the knowledge
    based society
  • Stocktaking
  • Follow-up structure
  • Work program 2003-2005

19
ERA
European Research Area
20
EHEA ? ERA
21
BERGEN COMMUNIQUÉ (20 MAY 2005)
  • The Ministers underline
  • the importance of higher education in further
    enhancing research
  • the importance of research in underpinning higher
    education for the economic and cultural
    development of our societies and for social
    cohesion

22
BERGEN COMMUNIQUÉ (20 MAY 2005)
They recognize the need to improve the synergy
between the higher education sector and other
research sectors throughout our respective
countries and between the EHEA and the European
Research Area.
23
Overregulation of doctoral programmes must be
avoided
BERGEN COMMUNIQUÉ (20 MAY 2005)
They urge universities to ensure that their
doctoral programmes promote interdisciplinary
training and the development of transferable
skills, thus meeting the needs of the wider
employment market.
24
LONDON COMMUNIQUÉ (18 MAY 2007)
Progress towards the EHEA
  • Stocktaking report - good overall progress
  • Mobility of staff, students and graduates is one
    of the core elements of the Bologna Process,
    creating opportunities for personal growth,
    developing international cooperation between
    individuals and institutions, enhancing the
    quality of higher education and research, and
    giving substance to the European dimension.
  • Degree structure
  • Recognition

25
LONDON COMMUNIQUÉ (18 MAY 2007)
  • Qualifications Frameworks
  • Lifelong Learning
  • Quality Assurance and a European Register of
    Quality Assurance Agencies
  • Doctoral candidates invite our HEIs to
    reinforce their efforts to embed doctoral
    programmes in institutional strategies and
    policies, and to develop appropriate career paths
    and opportunities for doctoral candidates and
    early stage researchers.
  • Social dimension
  • The European Higher Education Area in a global
    context- improving information- promoting
    attractiveness and competitiveness of EHEA

26
LONDON COMMUNIQUÉ (18 MAY 2007)
Looking forward to 2010 and beyond
  • We are determined to seize 2010, which will mark
    the passage from the Bologna Process to the EHEA,
    as an opportunity to reaffirm and to reformulate
    the vision that motivated us in setting the
    Bologna Process
  • to make the case for an EHEA underpinned by
    values and visions that go beyond issues of
    structures and tools.

27
THE NEW SYSTEM Italy has implemented the Bologna
Process since 1999

II LEVEL MASTER
I LEVEL MASTER
13-year education
28
SPAIN - still to be signed into law
DOCTORADO
MASTER
1?2 YEARS
GRADO 240 ECTS
4 YEARS
29
RUSSIA - simplified scheme

DOCTOR
3 YEARS
CANDIDATE
2 YEARS
MASTER
4 YEARS
BACHELOR
30
The great changes in the educational systems
require years to be completed since students
already enrolled with one system are generally
granted the opportunity to complete their
curriculum as begun
Let us see an example
31
BOLOGNA PROCESS
32
BOLOGNA PROCESS
33
BOLOGNA PROCESS
34
BOLOGNA PROCESS
35
BOLOGNA PROCESS
36
  • We spoke of structures,
  • we spoke of transitories, ...
  • but
  • what about the contents?

37
BOLOGNA DECLARATION
The Bologna declaration says
Access to the second cycle shall require
successful completion of first cycle studies,
lasting a minimum of three years. The degree
awarded after the first cycle shall also be
relevant to the European labour market as an
appropriate level of qualification.
38
IMPLEMENTATION IN SUBSTANCE
THE ITALIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM
39
THE NEW SYSTEM AT THE COLLEGES OF ENGINEERING OF
THE POLITECNICO DI MILANO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
LAUREA MAGISTRALE (MASTER EQUIVALENT)
LAUREA (BACHELOR
EQUIVALENT)
40
IMPLEMENTATION IN FORM
OLD
NEW
41
research
application
42
research
application
43
TU/TH
Dr.-Ing.
research
MSc (TU)
application
44
TU/TH
Dr.-Ing.
research
MSc (TU)
BSc (TU)
application
45
PhD
research
MSc (TU)
BSc (TU)
BEng
MEng
application
46
B) Highly integrated programs joint and double
degrees
47
Let us first say which is the main difference in
the mobility scenario between Europe and the
majority of other parts of the world
(particularly North America)
48
VERTICAL MOBILITY Scheme 1
Ph.D
Master
Bachelor
University A
University B
University C
49
VERTICAL MOBILITY Scheme 2
Ph.D
Master
Bachelor
University A
University B
50
HORIZONTAL MOBILITY in EUROPE
Erasmus
B
A
51
  • In general the Horizontal Mobility does not
    result in an additional degree, but only in the
  • Transfer of Academic Credits.

52
From the beginning, in the declarations and
communiqués, and in the discussions triggered by
them the following terms are often mentioned
Joint programmes Integrated programmes Integr
ated study programmes Joint degrees Double
degree programmes
53
Sorbonne (1998)
joint programmes are a significant contribution
to the progressive harmonization of the overall
framework of our degrees and cycles
Bologna (1999)
promotion of the necessary European dimension in
higher education, particularly with regards to
curricular development, inter-institutional
cooperation, mobility schemes and integrated
programmes of study, training and research
Prague (2001)
to increase the development of modules, courses
and curricula at all levels with European
content, orientation or organization. This
concerns particularly modules, courses and
curricula offered in partnership by institutions
from different countries and leading to a
recognized joint degree
54
Berlin (2003)
Development of integrated study programmes and
joint degrees at first, second and third
level Ministers agree to engage at the national
level to remove legal obstacles to the
establishment and recognition of such degrees and
to actively support the development and adequate
quality assurance of integrated curricula leading
to joint degrees.
Bergen (2005)
Ministers express support for the subsidiary
texts to the Lisbon Recognition Convention and
call upon all national authorities and other
stakeholders to recognise joint degrees awarded
in two or more countries in the EHEA.
55
HIGHLY INTEGRATED CURRICULA
We speak of double degree project
when each of the two Institutions involved awards
its own degree to the student who fulfilled the
prescribed requirements.
A joint degree on the contrary is a single
document issued by the Institutions involved in
addition or not to that of one of the two
Institutions.
56
DOUBLE DEGREES (at Masters level) Why to do
them?
57
Double Degrees Philosophy
  • Deeper cultural experience
  • Deeper training in the specific area

58
What makes this experience unique?
59
  • Learning and skill outcomes

60
  • Taking more advantages from differences than
    similarities in engineering education
  • A genuine opportunity to adapt to other countries

61
  • The students enrolled in a double degree
    programme are required an extra workload in terms
    of credits.
  • How much, it can be discussed.

62
  • Let su refer to the Italian case.
  • (Most of the European Countries adopted a similar
    system or are going towards it)

63

THE ITALIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM
120 ECTS
300 ECTS
180ECTS
13-year education
64
REQUIREMENTS BY THE POLITECNICO DI MILANO for
the SECOND CYCLE DOUBLE DEGREE (Academic Senate
Deliberation)
  • Minimum workload at the host Institution 120
    credits
  • Minimum extra workload (with respect to that
    of a student seeking only one degree) 60
    credits

This means that, in order to obtain the double
degree at the M.Sc. level, the minimum total
workload at the two Institutions and during the
two cycles is 360 credits
65
  • There are many possible schemes respecting these
    requirements.Let us mention only some of them as
    examples.

66
DOUBLE DEGREES
In Europe and where the two Institutions are
already organized in two tiers (32) Two simple
possibilities
67
A.1
Home Institution
Host Institution
Master of Science
Master of Science
nd
2
year
2
nd
year
2nd cycle
st
1
year
LS
st
st
1
year
1
year
3
rd
year
rd
3
year
2
nd
year
nd
1st cycle
2
year
Students total track
1
st
year
st
1
year
68
A.2
Home Institution
Host Institution
Master of Science
Master of Science
nd
2
year
2
nd
year
2nd cycle
st
st
1
year
1
year
3
rd
year
rd
3
year
2
nd
year
nd
1st cycle
2
year
1
st
year
st
1
year
69
Where one of the two Institutions has a
different system, ad hoc solutions have been
implemented, always respecting the overmentioned
requirements.
70
With partners outside Europe
71
DOUBLE DEGREES
With some partners in South America
(The problem of different calendars due to
different hemispheres)
72
E.1
Politecnico di Milano
USP Brasile
Laurea Magistrale
Ingeniero Civil orIngeniero Civil de Industria
5th year
4th semester LS
3rd semester LS
2nd cycle
4th year
2nd semester LS
1st semester LS
3rd year
3rd year
2nd year
1st cycle
2nd year
Students total track
1st year
1st year
73
E.2
Politecnico di Milano
USP Brasile
Laurea Magistrale
Ingeniero Civil orIngeniero Civil de Industria
2nd year
10th semester
2nd cycle
9th semester
1st year
8th semester
7th semester
3rd year
3rd year
2nd year
2nd year
1st cycle
Students total track
1st year
1st year
74
Why to hire a graduate with two degrees ?
75
  • Deeper training in the subject area
  • An approach to problems forms different points of
    view
  • The ability and confidence in adapting to any
    environment and challenge
  • A significant cultural and linguistic background

76
The example of the T.I.M.E. Association
77
THE T.I.M.E. ASSOCIATION
78
October 1988 Foundation Meeting
Purpose Furthering high level educational
programmes for engineers, preparing them to
function across national borders in the European
Community and in the world. Now 47 partner
Institutions in 20 Countries
79
(No Transcript)
80
Employability of T.I.M.E. double graduates
  • 1/3 employed in the country of the home
    Institution
  • 1/3 employed in the country of the host
    Institution
  • 1/3 employed in another country

81
  • For us,
  • this means a real internationalization,
  • not only
  • a bi-nationalization

82
JOINT DEGREES
83
JOINT DEGREES - ADVANTAGES
  • They can be well defined and visible products.
  • They can be done in a maximum of two years after
    the first cycle.
  • They can easily be offered to students coming
    from a third Institution.
  • The internationalization can be obtained by
    exchanging students for part of the curricula
    and/or by an extensive practice of teachers
    mobility.

84
JOINT DEGREES - DIFFICULTIES
  • Still many legal obstacles, sometimes even within
    Europe

85
JOINT DEGREES HIDDEN RISK
  • It is not often clearly shown (or even known)
    what is the legal value of the title, at least in
    the countries of the Institutions involved

86
JOINT MASTERS
By moving teachers
87
At both Institutions
J.1
Master
Master
professors
University A
University B
graduates
graduates
Advantage each partner University is permanently
involved
Disadvantage difficulties in synchronising the
teaching staff mobility
88
J.2
Itinerant
Master
Professors from the University A Professors from
the University B Professors from the University C
Once at the University A Once at the University
B Once at the University C
graduates
  • Advantages
  • Easier organization of the teaching staff
    mobility
  • Every University has to organise the courses
    once every two, three or more years

Disadvantage after some years many logistic
problems have to be solved almost from scratches
89
JOINT MASTERS
By moving students
90
J.3
MASTER
Project work at a Company.
3rd semester .
2nd semester .
1st semester ...
Module ? Module ? Module ?
GRADUATES
91
  • Advantage
  • easy to begin with and then to implement its
    steps.
  • Disadvantage
  • with more than three Universities and the same
    number of groups of students we need to make the
    modules completely independent one of the other
    to allow for different sequences.

92
J.4
MASTER
Project work at a Company.
3rd semester .
2nd semester .
1st semester ...
Module ? Module ? Module ?
GRADUATES
93
  • Advantage
  • one can add more Universities by increasing the
    radius of the cylinder maintaining the
    conceptually correct order of the modules
  • Disadvantages
  • more resources needed,
  • strict coordination between teachers of different
    Institutions.

94
  • C) Is it possible to measure success and/or
    quality?

95
Two factors are, in my opinion, becoming of
paramount importance in judging those programs
quality control and assurance
  • employability

96
  • The objective of the discussion has to be
    clarified
  • Often, when speaking of quality, we mean
    different things.

97
QUALITY
  • Definitions
  • ?? Q conformity to specifications (Crosby)
  • ?? Q suitability to use (Juran)
  • ?? Q should be oriented to present and future
    needs of consumers (Deming)
  • ?? Q ability to satisfy the needs (explicit and
    implicit) of the customer (here the constituency)
  • ?? Q degree in which a set of intrinsic
    characteristics satisfies requirements
    (Requirements needs or expectations that can be
    defined) (ISO 90002000)

98
QUALITY
  • Definitions
  • ?? Q conformity to specifications (Crosby)
  • ?? Q suitability to use (Juran)
  • ?? Q should be oriented to present and future
    needs of consumers (Deming)
  • ?? Q ability to satisfy the needs (explicit and
    implicit) of the customer (here the constituency)
  • ?? Q degree in which a set of intrinsic
    characteristics satisfies requirements
    (Requirements needs or expectations that can be
    defined) (ISO 90002000)

99
What the customer expects in terms of
satisfaction of his needs and expectations in
relation with a specific product or service
The set of requirements of a product or a
service, at the end of the designing process
The set of requirements of a product or a
service, at the end of the production or the
supply processes
What is perceived by the customer in terms of
satisfaction of his needs and expectations,
directly correlated to the value of the
requirements of the product or service, and
really usable by the customer
100
QUALITY CONTROL
  • For Double Degree programs it is almost built in
  • For Joint Degree programs it is badly needed both
    for the product and for the process

101
JOINT DEGREES ISSUES OF CONCERN
  • It is not often clearly shown (or even known)
    what is the legal value of the title, at least in
    the countries of the Institutions involved
  • Quality control is badly needed due to the
    mushrooming of the offer

102
The example of the T.I.M.E. Association
103
T.I.M.E. MASTER PROGRAMME
  • The T.I.M.E. Association adopted (2001) internal
    by-laws for the T.I.M.E. MASTER PROGRAMME
  • A 7-member T.I.M.E. MASTER Commission was
    established
  • Each proposal for the TMP must be presented by
    the Rectors/Presidents of the participating
    Institutions

104
T.I.M.E. MASTER PROGRAMME
  • The quality control on the content of the courses
    is left to the Institutions giving the courses
  • The T.I.M.E. MASTER Commission studies the
    quality of the proposed process and reports to
    the T.I.M.E. Advisory Board
  • The T.I.M.E. Advisory Board delivers the
    accreditation for 3 years

105
T.I.M.E. MASTER PROGRAMME
  • The T.I.M.E. MASTER is delivered by 2 or 3
    T.I.M.E. member Institutions
  • The label T.I.M.E. Master is awarded by the
    Association that consists of 46 top-level
    Institutions

106
EMPLOYABILITY
107
An important player is the job market.
108
Feedback
Design of the integrated international program
109
Involving Companies in those early stages
requires that the higher education Institution is
already strong enough in the field not to become
a mere provider of products, but to become the
partner which is knowledgeable and cares of the
full Education of the person.
110
Thank you for your attention
111
Double Doctorate (PhD)
112
Double PhD scheme
Ph.D.
Ph.D.
1 additional year of research at one of the two
Institutions
1½

½1

INSTITUTION A
INSTITUTION B
ADMISSION SELECTION (done by both Institutions)
113
  • MASTER/PhD PROGRAMME

Dottorato di Ricerca
Ph.D.
?
?
?3 years in total
Ph.D.
?
? Laurea Magistrale (M.Sc.)
?
? Laurea (B.Sc.)
Skipped years
Curriculum
US UNIVERSITY
POLITECNICO DI MILANO
Years jointly planned
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com