Title: Endof Life Vehicle ELV Directive Implementation in Estonia
1 End-of Life Vehicle (ELV) Directive
Implementation in Estonia 13.06.2006, Valencia
Peeter Eek Director General Waste
Department Ministry of the Environment
2Estonia - ELV Background, up to 2004
- The car Register mainly registered cars and few
of them was de-registered ever.... -
- There was no incentive to de-register the car
the outcome - Motor Vehicle Register became
slowly a dead souls register - Even, if dismantled and and handed to
scrapyards, often Vehicles remained in register
as Registered - Vehicle Dismantling was quiet disorganised
business, often 'on grey business area', - On the end of the 90-s rapidly grew criminality
on metal scrap (especially on energy lines) and
also on ELV- steals -
3Estonia - ELV Background, up to 2004
4Registration of the New Vehicles by Years
5Passenger cars registered 401 cars per Th
inhabitants
6First registrations of passengers cars
1997-2007Total/ incl new cars
7Number of imported vehicles into Estonia
8Age pattern of the Estonian car fleet (year
2001)average on 2007 13 y
9Distribution of car producers within the Estonian
car fleet (year 2001)?
10Concerns with the Register of the Motor Vehicles
- On 2002 all Vehicles in Register, with the
Certificates issued before 1993 and not presented
for re-registration, was cancelled from Register
(ca 40 th. Cars from Soviet period) - On 2004 the COD (Certificate of destruction) was
implemented as a pre-requirement for
de-registration - On 2005 mandatory insurance requirement for all
registered vehicles was introduced (temporary
de-registration is also possible)? - RESULT huge amount of applications for
de-registration, with the explanations, 'why the
Vehicle does not exist'
11Legislation in General
- Waste Act 2004, - The term Product of Concern
was introduced as general term for all products,
falling under the producer responsibility
principle - Regulation of the Government of the Republic (No
352, 13th December 2004) Requirements for
collection, take back, reuse or dispose of
vehicles and their spare parts - Regulation of the Minister of the Environment
(No 89, 8th July 2004 Treatment Requirements for
End-of Life Vehicles
12Regulation of ELV take-back
Producers ( importers) organise the collection
and treatment of ELV and their spare parts. The
owner of the ELV should have a possibility to get
rid of his/her ELV for free in the County, where
he/she lives or in range of 50 km. The costs
of take back, reuse and disposal of the ELV shall
be covered by the producer.
13Regulation of the Government
Producers, or a third parties acting on their
behalf, are obliged to take back all the vehicles
which have registration certificate and which are
registered in the Register of Vehicles. If waste
handlers or Dismantlers take back ELV-s (
issuing COD), then they are equalised on terms of
treatments and recovery obligations with the
Producers Collection point or treatment facility
issues COD (Certificate of Destruction) which
is a pre-requisite for de-registration of the
ELV.
14Reuse and recovery
- No later than 1 January 2006, for all ELV, the
reuse and recovery shall be increased to a
minimum of 85 by an average weight per vehicle
and year. Within the same time limit the reuse
and recycling shall be increased to a minimum of
80 by an average weight per vehicle and year. - No later than 1 January 2015, for all ELV, the
reuse and recovery shall be increased to a
minimum of 95 by an average weight per vehicle
and year. Within the same time limit the reuse
and recycling shall be increased to a minimum of
85 by an average weight per vehicle and year.
15Requirement for Dismantling sites and Dismantling
- Sites for temporary storage of ELV shall have
- a fence
- a guard equipment or keeping watch over site for
24 H - impermeable surfaces, where ELV-s are stored
- decanters and cleanser-degreasers,
- Sites for treatment (additionally to above
mentioned places) - Equipments or buildings for storage of spare
parts and hazardous waste - containers for storage of batteries, filters and
PCB/PCT-containing condensers - storage tanks for the segregated storage of
end-of-life vehicle fluids and gases - storage for used tyres and for other flammable
parts - scales
16Dismantling requirements
- Parts which have to be removed prior to
Shredding - reusable parts
- accumulators and liquefied gas tanks
- PCB/PCT-containing condensers
- fuel, oils, cooling liquid and all other liquids
- oil and fuel filters
- air-conditioning system fluid
- potential explosive components (e.g. air bags)?
- all components identified as containing mercury
17Regulation of the Minister of the Environment
- Before the final shredding there should be
removed - catalysts
- metal components containing copper, aluminium
and magnesium if these metals are not segregated
in the shredding process - tyres
- glass
- large plastic components (bumpers, dashboard,
fluid containers, etc), - if these materials are not separated after
shredding
18Practical Concerns Financial issues
On 2002 the EU Commission report estimated, that
value of ELV, when treated in accordance with
the requirements is ca -100 . On 2004 'hot
debate' whether the ELV treatment is possible
with 0 price On 2007-2008 Dismantlers pay for
each ELV ca 100 RESULT No ELV is delivered
back to producers, hence there have not been
motivation to establish Producer Responsibility
Organisation (Collective scheme)?
19Legal Concerns When is Car a waste? Question by
cars (or waste?) transport
There are companies, which buy 'crashed cars'
from other EU countries, usually newer
models Those are brought to the Country 'as
goods' ( not waste!)? Often are those cars
never registered in Producer Responsibility
register as are not registered in Vehicle
Register but are actually dismantled... So
will actually 'a steam of materials' generated,
which does not comply with the Reporting of
de-registrations and COD-s.
20System proposed by Car manufacturers and
importers
21- ELV 'full and 'undrained'is HazW -
- but
- bought by dismantlers as ca 120 per ELV
-
22- ELV 'drained' before delivery to Dismantlers or
uncompleted-ELV Problem for reporting and
supervision -
23- ELV- cleaned, non-hazardous -
- often delivered so, but sometimes unclear, where
were treated? -
24Association of Dismantlers
Over 20 Dismantlers, holders of the HazW
Licences Oriented as first priority to sell
reusable parts Hand removal of glasses, bigger
plastic parts etc., Draining of ELV
Internet-based search system for re-use spare
parts over all members
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27General operation of the system
The first reciver of the ELV issues a COD -
pre-requisite for de-registration Then removal
of all liquids, re-usable parts, but also
glasses, tyres, bigger plastic parts The
'treated ELV is delivered to the Shredder
Company' All metals are removed, ferrous and
non-ferrous metals separated All liquids are
incinerated in cement kiln Tyres are
recovered SLF until now mainly landfilled, but
separation of plastics for incineration is on the
way Also Post-shredder technology is under the
way
28Shreddering the Hard-plastics from ELV (delivered
to Asia mainly)?
29Shreddered tyres recovered mainly as a
construction material in road construction
30- Results
- On 2006 there was de-registered ca 11 th cars,
recovery was ca 82 - Actually is summary of the waste reports 'a
pussle' - - there is serious need to try to improve the
reporting quality - - Supervision is one of the key-issues to have
better overview over issues who are putting cars
and parts to the market, - - what is imported as goods, but handled as waste
31- Concerns and Future
- With the growth of economy is market for reusable
parts decreasing, also as difference in prices
with B-quality parts is often insignificant - The 'Post-shredder' treatment of SLF (shredder
light fraction) seems unavoidable - The de-registration of 'in fact ELV-s' should be
motivated best option would be 'car-tax' this
have been discussed already many years, as
revenue tax or 'air pollution' issue but it's
most important as well to get REAL overview of
ELV-s.
32Thank for Your attention!