Title: SCM Overview
1SCM Overview
- 2002.4.9
- ????? ??????? ???
- ???
2Contents
- Evolution of the Integrated Logistics Concept
- The Achilles Heel of SCM
- What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product?
- Making Supply Meet Demand in an Uncertain World
- Mass Customization at HP The power of
postponement - The Power of Virtual Integration An interview
with Dell Computers Michael Dell
3Evolution of the Integrated Logistics Concepts
- Bernard J.La Londe Ohio State University
- Integrated Distribution Management-The American
Perspective - Long Range Planning No.1 (December 1969)
- 1993 revision
4History
- Begin
- Rome, Napoleon(logistique), World War 1,2
- Industrial revolution ??? ?? ??, specialized
middleman
- Three Questions
- What is integrated Logistics management?
- Why did the issue of integrated logistics become
important? - How has integrated logistics evolved over the
past 3 decades?
5What?
- Raw material
- Subassemblies
- Manufactured part
- Racking materials
Goods in Process Inventory
Finished Goods Inventory
Field Inventory
Customer
- Physical distribution
- Post-World War 2 business management
- The movement and handling of goods from the
point of production - to the point on production to the point of
consumption or user
- Materials Management
- All materials employed in the production of the
finished product - Inventory control, purchasing, traffic,
materials handling, receiving
- Business logistics
- Emerged during 1980s1990s as strategy
- From raw material through finished goods
inventory
6Why?
- Pressure on cost reduction
- During the late 1950s1960s
- Increasing marketing costs, well advanced
production technology - Relatively untouched areas ? distribution(1030)
- Data processing technology
- Computer technology became increasingly powerful,
less costly - Automated inventory control
- Customer focus
- Right time in the right quantity
- Particular importance for those companies selling
relatively homogeneous products - Profit Leverage
- 5 cost reduction ? more than 5 revenue increase
7How?
Physical Distribution (40)
Procurement (30)
Customer
Vendor
Operations (30)
8- Physical Distribution
- 1950s1960s
- Focus to meet customer expectation at lowest
possible cost - Why the integration process started with finished
goods - The Largest single segment on inventory(40)
- Directly impacts customer service
- Without venturing into production processes
- Low risk, high gain
- Limitation
- Internal Linkages
- Around 1985
- 60100 of the firm's total inventory could be
better managed - Elimination of buffer inventories between loops
- External Linkages
- Efficiencies in relationships with vendors,
customers, third parties - EDI, JIT, DRP
9Future-two trends
- Cycles-time-to-market
- Removal of time
- Reducing the design-build-ship cycle
- Process setup elimination
- Supply Chain Management
- Last half of the 1990s2000s
- Both internal and external units are forged
together - Low-cost and high-value performance to the
consumer - More responsive inventory systems
10The Achilles Heel of SCM
Ananth Raman Pro. at Harvard Business School in
Boston Nicole DeHoratius, Zeynep Ton Doctoral
candidates at HBS Harvard Business Review
(JulyAugust 2000)
11New technology
- Automatically track the flow of goods
- Electronically transmit replenishment orders
- Fewer stockouts
- Bar code scanners
- Electronic inventory
- Synchronize production schedules to real-
- time demand data
- Fewer inventory
12Data Inaccurate
- Data error
- 35 leading retailer - 2/3 of SKU
- Reduced the companys overall profits by 10
- Phantom stockouts
- Employees routinely put products in the wrong
places - 16 stockouts but the items available
- Why?
- Human nature
- Retailers distribution centers
- Wrong quantities for 29 of the SKUs, deviation
from actual supplies of 25 - Items shipped in error that cost less than a
certain amount - Most stores perform audits solely for financial
reasons, to measure the shrink of goods that
have been lost or pilfered. - Measure inventory by dollar value, not by item
13What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product?
Marshall L.Fisher Wharton School University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Harvard
Business Review (MarchApril 1997)
14Introduction
- Global competition
- Faster product development
- Variety of products
New Concept
New Technology
- Point-of-sale scanners
- Electronic data interchange
- Flexible manufacturing
- Automated warehousing
- Rapid logistic
- Quick response
- Efficient consumer response
- Accurate response
- Mass customization
- Lean manufacturing
- Agile manufacturing
But
- Excess and shortage of products
- Markdowns and stockouts
- ex) U.S. food industry, poor coordination is
wasting 30billion
15First step-Product
Type Functional Innovative
Aspects of Demand Predictable Unpredictable
Product life cycle more than 2 years 3 month 1year
Contribution margin 520 2060
Product variety low(1020) high(often millions)
Error in forecast 10 40100
Stockout rate 12 1040
Markdown 0 1025
Lead time required for made-to-order products 6month1year 1day2weeks
Example Gro Fashion apparel
16Second step-Supply chain
- Physical function
- Function
- Converting raw materials into parts, component,
finished goods - Transporting all of them from one point in the
supply chain to next - Cost
- Production, transportation, inventory storage
- Market mediation function
- Function
- matched what consumers want to buy
- Cost
- markdown, stockouts dissatisfied customer
17Type Physically Efficient Process Market-Responsive Process
Primary purpose at lowest possible cost minimize stockouts markdowns
Manufacturing focus maintain high average utilization deploy excess buffer capacity
Inventory strategy high turns, minimum inventory deploy significant buffer stocks
Lead-time shorten lead time as long as it doesnt increase cost invest aggressively in ways to reduce lead time
Choosing suppliers cost and quality speed, flexibility, quality
Product-design maximize performance, minimize cost modular design in order to postpone product differentiation
18Third step-Matching
- Matching Supply Chains with Products
19Case
- Efficient supply of functional products
- Campbell Soup
- 5 of products are new
- Highly predictable,
- More than 98 service level
- Responsive supply of innovative products
- Obermeyer
- 95 of products new
- 200 forecast error
20- Functional ? Innovative
- Why?
- customer needs
- to avoid low margin
- Automobile
- Many options(color, interior,configuration,..)?act
ually 20 million versions - Full option lead time8 weeks? 90 customer buy
the car off the lot - needs responsive supply chain
- Innovative ? Functional
- Computer
- 20 years ago,IBM 360 mainframe 14-month lead time
- Now lead time dropped to days by physical
efficiency
21Making Supply Meet Demand in an Uncertain World
Marshall L.Fisher Wharton School University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Janice
H. Hammond, Ananth Raman Harvard Business School
Walter R.Obermeyer a principal of Sport
Obermeyer Ltd. , in Aspen, Colorado, a graduate
of the Harvard Harvard Business Review (MayJune
1994)
22Introduction
- global competition
- faster product development
- variety of products
- inaccurate forecast
- markdown, stockouts
New concept
- fast direct response to demand Quick response,
JIT - MRP rapidly change the schedules
Limitation
- too large capacity in order to response to actual
demand - dependent on an unresponsive suppliers
- the supply chain has already been filled based on
the old one
23Markdowns
24Why?
- Problems
- Most companies still treat the world as if it
were predictable - Poor job of incorporating demand uncertainty into
their production planning processes - Design their planning processes as if that
initial forecast truly represented reality. why? - its complicated to factor multiple demand
scenarios into planning - most companies simply dont know how to do it
- Frequent introductions of new products have two
side effects - reduce the average lifetime of products
- demand is divided over a growing number of SKUs
- ex) GM Cadillac(Seville and Eldorado) vs. Buicks
and Olds mobiles
25- Accurate response
- Improve forecast
- Redesign planning processes to minimize the
impact of inaccurate forecasts
costs per unit of stockouts and markdowns, missed
opportunity cost
predictable well
make in advance
unpredictable
postpone decisions, early in the selling season
26Case - Sport Obermeyer
- Obermeyer
- leading suppliers in the US fashion sky apparel
market - newly designed each year
- difficult to predict weather, fashion, trends,
economy
Until the mid-1980s
- design and show samples to retailers in March
- place production orders with suppliers in March
April - receive goods an D/C in SeptemberOctober
- ship to retail outlets
27Limitations
- First step Shorten lead time - Quick response
- Computerized systems order process time, time
to compute material requirements - Anticipate what materials it would require
- pre-position in a warehouse
- Air freight to expedite delivery
- Early Write
- persuaded some of important retailer customers to
place orders sooner - 20 of total sales
- Second step Improving forecast
- Buying committee
- Group of company managers from a range of
functional area - Sales exceed by 200, less than 15 of the
forecast
28Accurate response
- Changing Buying committee
- Single consensus forecast for each style and
color - ? Each member makes an independent forecast for
each style and color
Accuracy Pandora gt Entice
forecasts
?A way to estimate which styles were accurately
forecast
29Accurate response
- Update Early Write order
- Overall buying patterns of retailers were
remarkably similar - Updating the buying committees forecasts using
Early Write
sales
sales
Early Writer 20 Updating
80 Updating
initial forecasts
30Accurate response
- Risk-based production sequencing
non reactive capacity
- Demand forecast are most accurate
Early Write
reactive capacity
31Accurate response
- Mathematical Model
- stockout and markdown cost 10.2? 1.8
32Accurate response
- Redesign
- reduced the variety of zippers used (color,
length) - use the same kinds of raw materials
- Tracking forecasting errors
33Mass Customization at HP
Edward Feitzenger a process-technology manager at
the HP Hau L.Lee Industerial engineering and
engineering management, Stanford
University Harvard Business Review (12 1997)
34Introduction
- orders be fulfilled ever more quickly
- highly customized products and services
Postponing the task of differentiating a product
- Organizational-design principles
- Product
- Process
- Supply network
35Modular Product Design
- Modular Design
- Flexibility, quickly, inexpensively
- Common components, differential components
- Benefits
- Maximize the number of standard components
- assemble those common components earlier stage
- postpone the differential components
- The modules of the product separately, possible
at the same time - shortens the total time required for production
- Easily diagnose production problems, isolate
potential quality problems - Considerations
- Cost of materials lt benefits of standardization(
lead time, inventory, stockout)
36- Example Printer
- Universal power supply(Europe and North America
LaserJet) 5 - Postpone the assembly(Europe and Asia DeskJet)
- customization at local D/C(Europe) rather than at
factories(Singapore) - country-specific power supply, packaging, manuals
25
37- generic DeskJet printer for both Mac and Do
38Modular Process Design
- Modular process
- breaking down into independent sub processes
- flexibility
- Process postponement
- ex) paint store a broad range of different
paints ? color pigments - ex) retail apparel industry body-measurement
processcut-and-sew process - specific garment instead of stock in all sizes
and colors, eliminating discounts - relatively low-cost raw fabrics
- Process resequencing
- ex) Benetton dyeing, knitting ? knitting, dyeing
- ex) HP disk driver inserting printed circuit
board, testing disk driver - ? standard tests
customized tests - Process standardization
39Agile Supply Network
- Redesign network
- Optimum number and location of factories and D/C
- Multi-function warehouse
- perform light manufacturing
40The Power of Virtual Integration
Joan magretta Harvard Business Review (1998)
41The Evolution of a faster business model
The dominant model in the PC industry
A Value chain with arms-length transactions from
one layer to the next
suppliers
manufacturer
D/C
customer
Dells direct model
Eliminated the time and cost of third-party
distribution
customer
suppliers
manufacturer
Virtual integration
Blurring the traditional boundaries and roles in
the value chain
suppliers
suppliers
manufacturer
customer
42Fast-cycle segmentation
- Fast-cycle segmentation
- The finer the segmentation, the better forecast
what customer needs and when
43(No Transcript)
44Inventory Strategy
How fast its moving
How much inventory there is
80 days inventory
11 days inventory
vs.
- The cost of materials goes down 50 a year
- New computers gets to market 69 days sooner
45Conclusion