CDIO Curriculum Design Process AeroAstro - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

CDIO Curriculum Design Process AeroAstro

Description:

Cognitive Progressions of 2x, 3x, 4x. Workshop/Retreat April, 2002 ... Expanded versions, including cognitive progressions, of 2x, 3x, 4x mappings were ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: johnek
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CDIO Curriculum Design Process AeroAstro


1
CDIO Curriculum Design ProcessAero/Astro
  • Ed Crawley
  • February 2003
  • Rough Draft 1

2
General Timeline of Curriculum Design Activities
  • Dept Strategic Plan
  • Compilation/Analysis of Goals of Undergraduate
    Education (Academic, Industrial, ABET)
  • Proficiency Survey
  • CDIO Syllabus and Report
  • Benchmarking Survey
  • Faculty Workshops/Retreats May and June, 2001
  • Mapping of Program Learning Objectives to CDIO
    Content
  • Initial Mapping of 2x, 3x, 4x to Core, PAS,
    Capstone, Other
  • Sub-committees on Core, Math, PAS, Capstone
  • Design Goals and Proposed Designs
  • Overall Conceptual Design (Eye Chart)
  • Sub-committees on 2x, 3x, 4x
  • Mapping of 2x, 3x, 4x with I, T, U to Unified,
    Advanced Core, PAS Capstone
  • Cognitive Progressions of 2x, 3x, 4x
  • Workshop/Retreat April, 2002
  • Discussion and Refinement of 2x, 3x, 4x with I,
    T, U Design Maps
  • Final Preliminary Draft Presented to and Approved
    by Faculty, May 2002
  • CDIO I-T-U Design Sheets for Unified, Advanced
    Core, PAS Capstone
  • Partial Implementation within Individual Courses,
    September 2002

3
CDIO Overlay Design
  • Foundation laid for overlay design during the
    Benchmarking Survey- faculty started thinking
    about which CDIO topics were already included in
    their courses
  • Ownership in the faculty
  • Active design work by the faculty took place over
    an academic year
  • Teams for 2x, 3x, 4x then teams for Core, PAS,
    Capstone
  • Several versions and views of overlay designs
    were created for discussion, review, refinement

4
2.x Mapping
5
3.x Mapping
6
3.x Mapping continued
7
4.x Mapping
8
PRIMARY 2.2 EXPERIMENTATION
2.1 ENG.
REASONING 3.1 TEAMWORK TEACHING
3.1 TEAMWORK
3.2
COMMUNICATIONS 3.2
COMMUNICATION 2.2
EXPERIMENTATION
4.4 DESIGN

2.3 SYSTEM THINKING

4.3 CONCEIVING
4.4 DESIGNING SECONDARY 2.3
SYSTEM THINKING
2.4 PERSONAL
2.5 PROFESSIONAL TEACHING
2.4 PERSONAL 2.5 PROFESSIONAL
4.1 SOCIETAL CONT 4.6
OPERATIONS 4.4 DESIGNING
4.2 ENTERPRISE CONT
4.5 IMPLEMENTATION OR
REQUIRED
CORE PAS
CAPSTONE ______________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___ ELECTIVE 16.00 UROP
UPOP 2-3
PROFESIONAL 3-4
IAP STUDENT TA
OPPORTUNITY
INTERN. EXPER
INTERN.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
PRIMARY 4.4 DESIGN 2.2
EXPT 3.1 TEAM 4.5 IMPL
2.4 PERS 4.2 ENTERP
??? 4.3 CONCEIV. 2.5
PROF TEACHING 3.1 TEAM
4.2 ENTERP 4.6 OPER
2.5 PROF 4.4 DESIGN
4.4 DESIGN 3.2
COMM SECONDARY 4.1 SOCIET

4.5 IMPLEM. TEACHING
4.2 ENTER 4.6 OPERATE 3/02
9
Sample Mapping of Program Learning Objectives to
Courses in Aero/Astro, MIT
  • Mapping is based on the stated learning
    objectives for each course as found in the
    syllabus. 09/13/01 DRB
  • LEARNING OBJECTIVES 16.010/020 16.050 16.060 16.
    070
  • 1.1 Understand underlying sciences X
  • 1.2 Apply principles of engineering
    fundamentals X X X
  • 1.3 Have working knowledge of professional
    engineering
  • 2.1 Solve engineering problems X X X
  • 2.2 Conduct inquiry and experimentation in
    engineering X
  • 2.3 Think holistically and systematically X X X X
    X
  • 2.4 Master personal skills X
  • 2.5 Master professional skills X
  • 3.1 Lead and work in teams X
  • 3.2 Communicate effectively X X
  • 4.1 Recognize importance of societal
    context X
  • 4.2 Appreciate enterprise cultures and
    organizations X
  • 4.3 Conceive engineering systems X X X X
  • 4.4 Design complex systems X X X X
  • 4.5 Implement processes and manage
    implementation X X X
  • 4.6 Operate complex systems and manage
    operations X X X

10
April 2002 Workshop
  • Expanded versions, including cognitive
    progressions, of 2x, 3x, 4x mappings were
    discussed, debated, refined, by the faculty
  • In 2x, 3x, 4x teams in the morning
  • In Unified, Core, PAS, and Capstone teams in the
    afternoon
  • After some swapping, trading, and dealing,
    final versions were created
  • In subsequent curriculum committee meetings,
    issues that arose during the workshop were
    resolved

11
Sample Expanded 2.1 Mapping
12
Final Preliminary Design
  • Based on the results of the April Workshop
  • Presented to the faculty for approval May 22
  • Approved
  • Two-page Design Overview Sheet disseminated to
    faculty for ease of reference
  • Charge given to faculty to implement as much as
    is practical for AY 02/03
  • Resources available over summer during semester
    for implementation help (IRMs will be vital
    resource when completed)
  • Full implementation expected for AY 03/04

13
Sample Final Preliminary Design
14
Design Overlay Two-Page Overview
  • Sample

15
Summary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com