MMS Issues Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

MMS Issues Review

Description:

7 August, 2006. ERCOT Public - TPTF. MMS Issues Review. Brandon Whittle ... If SCED issues a base point based on a mitigated offer, is there a requirement ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: nodal
Category:
Tags: mms | issues | review | whittle

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MMS Issues Review


1
MMS Issues Review
  • Brandon Whittle
  • Lead, Real-Time Market Operations

2
Notification of Mitigation in SCED
  • If SCED issues a base point based on a mitigated
    offer, is there a requirement that QSEs be
    notified?
  • If not, is it something to add as a nice-to-have?

3
Use of Combined Cycle Power Augmentation Methods
  • Protocol 6.5.5.2 (9)
  • A QSE representing combined-cycle Resources shall
    provide ERCOT with the possible operating
    configurations for each power block with
    accompanying limits and price points. Power
    augmentation methods must be made available to
    ERCOT as part of one or more of the
    configurations. Price points for the range of
    the curve represented by the power augmentation
    method must reflect the price of the added
    capability. Such power augmentation methods may
    include
  • (a) Combustion turbine inlet air cooling (CTIAC)
    methods
  • (b) Duct firing
  • (c) Other ways of temporarily increasing the
    output of combined-cycle Resources and
  • For QFs, an LSL that represents the minimum
    energy available, in MW, from the Resource for
    economic dispatch based on the minimum stable
    steam delivery to the thermal host plus a
    justifiable reliability margin that accounts for
    changes in ambient conditions.
  • Assumption is that this is instructing QSEs to
    include these methods when considering their
    configuration limits and bids and ERCOT does
    provide any specific type of dispatch or
    commitment to account for these methods.

4
Use of Generic Incremental Cost for Energy
Dispatch in RUC
  • Protocol 5.5.2 (4)
  • To determine the projected energy output level of
    each Resource and to project potential congestion
    patterns for each hour of the RUC, ERCOT shall
    calculate proxy Energy Offer Curves based on the
    Mitigated Offer Caps for the type of Resource as
    specified in Section 4.4.9.4, Mitigated Offer Cap
    and Mitigated Offer Floor , for use in the RUC.
    Proxy Energy Offer Curves are calculated by
    multiplying the Mitigated Offer Cap by a constant
    selected by ERCOT from time to time and applying
    the cost for all Generation Resource output
    between HSL and LSL. The constant selected by
    ERCOT may not be more than 0.001.
  • Multiplying offers by a small constant (.001)
    will prevent offers from influencing commitment
  • ERCOT is concerned that using Mitigated Caps
    instead of available Offers will produce a
    inaccurate dispatch prediction within RUC
    leading to a different set of transmission
    constraints than would be present in SCED

5
Energy Offer Curves for RUC Committed Units
  • Is a QSE required to submit an Energy Offer Curve
    for a RUC committed unit?
  • If Yes
  • This would be consistent with Zonal Protocols
  • Would allow Settlement Calculations to be simpler
  • Needs to be in Protocols
  • If No
  • RUC calculation depends on Energy Offer Curve
    (through RTAIEC)
  • Using Proxy Curves developed around Output
    Schedule leads to times when it is financially
    rewarding for QSEs to not enter offer curve

6
Use of Telemetered Ramp Rate in Real-Time
  • Protocols 6.4.5 (1)
  • ERCOT shall use the telemetered Resource Status
    for all applications requiring status of
    Resources during the Operating Hour, including
    SCED, Load Frequency Control (LFC), and Network
    Security Analysis processes. QSEs shall provide
    ERCOT with accurate telemetry of the current
    capability of each Resource including the
    Resource Status, Ramp Rates, HSL, and LSL and a
    text reason for any Resource where a Ramp Rate is
    deviating from a standard Ramp Rate curve for the
    Resource, or the HSL is less than, or LSL is
    greater than, the normal high and low limits set
    in Section 3.7.1, Resource Parameter Criteria.
  • Protocols 6.5.7.1.12
  • (c) Normal Ramp Rate by using the curve submitted
    by the QSE and the Resources MW telemtery
  • (d) Emergency Ramp Rate by using the curve
    submitted by the QSE and the Resources MW
    telemtery
  • In Protocols 6.5.7.2, SCED ramp rates are
    calculated using normal and emergency ramp rates.
  • What then, is the purpose of having a telemetered
    ramp rate?
  • ERCOT believes that using a telemetered ramp rate
    in SCED would be preferable since generation
    characteristics can change without timely update
    to registration data.
  • Use of telemetered ramp rates in SCED would
    require protocol changes.

7
The End
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com