Performance Improvement Mapping - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Performance Improvement Mapping

Description:

Focused on raising student MCAS performance in ELA and math ... Participants have to wrestle with why what we are doing is not working better. PIM Process ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: bobb93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Performance Improvement Mapping


1
Performance Improvement Mapping
  • Findings from the 2008-09 RLS
  • ELA and Math Teams

2
Menu
  • Overview of the PIM Process
  • Math Team Findings
  • Improvement Objectives
  • Evaluation of Current and New Strategies
  • ELA Team Findings
  • Improvement Objectives
  • Evaluation of Current and New Strategies
  • Summary

3
What Is PIM?
  • Performance Improvement Mapping (PIM)
  • An intensive, data-driven, results-oriented
    school planning model
  • Focused on raising student MCAS performance in
    ELA and math
  • PIM process can be broken down into three major
    parts
  • Evidence (What are we doing?)
  • Causes (Why are we not doing better?)
  • Solutions (How can we do this better?)

4
PIM Success
  • Staff must be involved in data analysis and
    decision making
  • Main focus must be on continuous improvement
  • Energy should be primarily directed toward
    changing that which is in the schools control
  • Any other planning should be integrated with PIM
    process and findings
  • Planning should both inform and respond to the
    districts improvement plan

5
PIM Process
  • Evidence/Data Collection
  • MCAS Analysis
  • Identify where students are underperforming
  • Skills and knowledge students have not mastered
  • Development of specific student learning
    objectives to focus PIM group meetings
  • Staff Survey
  • Strengths and weaknesses as perceived by all
    staff
  • Focused on curriculum, instruction, student
    assessment and academic support services

6
PIM Process
  • Causes
  • Success of the entire PIM process hinges on
    getting to the root causes
  • Causal analysis
  • Self-reflection on how teaching and learning can
    be improved
  • Participants have to wrestle with why what we are
    doing is not working better

7
PIM Process
  • Solutions
  • Mapping teams were involved with
  • Selecting specific instructional strategies
  • Prioritizing needs and programs
  • Asked to look beyond easy answers
  • Focused on customizing accepted practices to meet
    individual needs of the student, classroom, and
    school
  • Examined new practices as well as existing ones

8
Methods for Group Decision Making
  • Worked to reach consensus
  • Consensus promotes growth of a professional
    community
  • Teams worked through differences to reach a
    mutually satisfactory position
  • In the best interest of students
  • Supported by data
  • All points of view were considered

9
PIM Outcomes
  • Evidence from data will be used as the
  • basis for all decision making
  • Teachers will find new ways to interpret data
  • Staff will look for root causes before attempting
    to solve problems
  • Administrators will involve staff in informed
    decision making regarding program development
  • Communication about teaching and learning will
    increase at grade, subject, and school level

10
Solutions Areas of Focus
  • Curriculum
  • Instruction
  • Vocabulary
  • Assessment
  • Writing
  • Leadership
  • Collaboration
  • Professional Development

11
Overview of Findings
  • Findings based on priorities developed by our ELA
    and math focus groups
  • For each improvement objective, current
    strategies and new strategies were examined
  • Looked at what we needed to do less of or
    eliminate as well as what we needed to do more
    of, modify or add
  • Findings to be included in the new School
    Improvement Plan

12
Math Improvement Objectives
  • Students will receive instruction based on a
    district-wide K-6 curriculum guide that includes
    learning objectives, pacing, standards-based
    units, scope and sequence and vertical alignment.
  • Students in grades K-6 will consistently use math
    terminology and math definitions from a
    district-wide vocabulary list.
  • Students will be assessed using district-wide
    assessment tools that measure grade-level
    proficiencies and help teachers identify student
    learning needs. Students will learn to
    self-assess.

13
Math Improvement Objectives
  • Student learning will be driven by administrative
    leadership that understands effective math
    instruction and holds teachers accountable for
    following the curriculum.
  • Students will be taught by teachers who have been
    provided opportunities to observe, collaborate
    and communicate with colleagues regarding best
    practices used across the district.
  • Students will benefit from teachers who have had
    professional development in math including
    content knowledge, use of manipulatives, flexible
    grouping, formative and summative assessments and
    effective use of essential instructional
    activities during the math block.

14
PIM Findings-Math
  • Curriculum-Current Strategies
  • Power Standards
  • Work has input from staff a collaborative
    process
  • Need to finish with grades K-3 need to develop
    quality units and assessments around power
    standards
  • Curriculum Guides
  • Discontinue use of old guides/previous work
  • Multiple Math Programs Across District
  • Evaluate new math programs adopt new district
    program
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Provide MCAS Practice

15
PIM Findings-Math
  • Curriculum- New Strategies
  • Develop Curriculum Guides
  • Collaborative effort by all district staff
  • Standards-based
  • Vertical alignment
  • Scope sequence
  • Learning objectives
  • Quality assessments of and for learning
  • Training/time to support effort

16
PIM Findings-Math
  • Vocabulary-Current Strategies
  • Use of Textbook
  • Not aligned to frameworks lacking MCAS
    vocabulary
  • Need to supplement
  • Curriculum Frameworks
  • Standards need to be implemented by all and
    incorporated into lessons across district
    standards need to be shared with students in
    language they can understand
  • Discontinue reliance on individual teacher biases
    and areas of expertise

17
PIM Findings-Math
  • Vocabulary-New Strategies
  • Develop District-wide Vocabulary List
  • Input from all grades across district (K-6)
  • Focus on content and MCAS specific vocabulary
  • Develop Assessments
  • Assess understanding of vocabulary
  • Formal and Informal
  • Grade appropriate

18
PIM Findings-Math
  • Assessment-Current Strategies
  • Math Inventories
  • Done by all assessment of basic knowledge of
    skills
  • Strictly multiple choice limited diagnostic
    information
  • Need collaborative approach to modifying the test
  • Power Standards
  • Used to identify and define areas of importance
  • Unit Tests
  • Tests need to be aligned with standards need
    examples of quality student work to share with
    students
  • MCAS

19
PIM Findings-Math
  • Assessment-New Strategies
  • Common Assessments
  • Teacher designed based on power standards
  • Not completed for all grades need to share with
    all staff
  • Need to develop common approach to scoring
    student work
  • Increased Communication of Assessment Results
  • Among grade levels between grades and schools
  • Student Self-Assessment
  • Time to reflect and analyze journal writing

20
PIM Findings-Math
  • Leadership-Current Strategies
  • Teacher Evaluations
  • Do hold all teachers accountable
  • Modify with more constructive feedback
  • Power Standards
  • Administration was part of process help to unify
    process
  • Need follow-through at Principal meetings
  • PIM Process
  • Helped administration to understand subject
    specific concerns

21
PIM Findings-Math
  • Leadership-New Strategies
  • Training For Administrators
  • Keep current with core instructional practices
    and approaches
  • Grade Level Meetings
  • Administration sit-in stay without interruption
  • Establish ground rules (procedural and
    interpersonal norms)
  • Keep up with curriculum and grade/subject
    concerns

22
PIM Findings-Math
  • Collaboration-Current Strategies
  • P. D. Days/Release Time
  • Time for staff from all grades to participate in
    math work
  • Expand opportunities to share/collaborate
  • Common Planning Time
  • By grade levels no access to other staff or
    other grades
  • Need direction input from staff hold people
    accountable
  • Faculty Meetings
  • Provide more opportunities to collaborate and
    share best practices more work on grade/building
    initiatives
  • Address housekeeping issues in another way

23
PIM Findings-Math
  • Collaboration-New Strategies
  • New Evaluation Opportunities
  • Opportunities to self-reflect work
    collaboratively with administration
  • Team Teaching
  • Need time to prepare/communicate P.D. to develop
    techniques and strategies limited by number of
    staff
  • Peer Coaching
  • Opportunity define and develop teacher-leaders
  • Monthly Release Day not in current calendar
  • Teacher input into direction/focus

24
PIM Findings-Math
  • Professional Development-Current Strategies
  • Manipulative Training
  • Happened in the past little follow-through
  • Update materials and re-train
  • Differentiated Instruction Training
  • Not all trained unclear expectations
  • Need follow-up in classroom use staff as
    trainers
  • Training on Flexible Small Groups
  • Have had training specific to reading Need
    training applicable to math and classroom level
    follow-up

25
PIM Findings-Math
  • Professional Development-New Strategies
  • Use of Formative Assessments
  • Develop assessments effective use of formative
    assessment tools
  • Use of New Software
  • STAR Reading and STAR Math SuccessMaker Lexia
  • Content Specific Training
  • Led by math teachers enhance math skills of
    teachers as well as develop instructional tools

26
ELA Improvement Objectives
  • Students will receive instruction based upon
    coordinated curriculum in all subjects that is
    followed by every teacher.
  • Students will receive instruction consisting of
    engaging activities that utilize a variety of
    teaching strategies, clearly differentiated
    instruction, small group instruction and
    intervention.
  • Students will receive instruction informed by
    ongoing analysis of assessment results.
  • Students will apply common writing strategies.
  • Students will be taught by teachers who
    collaborate within and across grade levels within
    their school and district-wide.

27
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Curriculum Current Strategies
  • Alignment to State Curriculum Frameworks
  • Finish power standards work in math
  • Begin work in science and social studies
  • Curriculum Guides in ELA Math
  • Focus on scope and sequence/curriculum mapping
  • Available to all district focus involve all
    teachers
  • Posting Standards
  • Student friendly language focus of lesson
  • Tracking Sheets
  • Discontinue use

28
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Curriculum New Strategies
  • Consistent District-Wide Curriculum
  • Math adopt unified program develop quality
    assessments provide more small group
    opportunities
  • Sci./S.S. begin curriculum work
  • More hands-on activities
  • Enough Curriculum Materials
  • Supplementary materials in math
  • Basic materials in science and social studies
  • More Enrichment Opportunities for Students
  • Cross-grading

29
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Instruction-Current Strategies
  • Differentiated Instruction
  • Inconsistent training and follow-up
  • Classroom level support needed opportunities to
    observe
  • Guided Reading
  • Discontinue whole-class use still use to meet
    certain learning needs
  • My Sidewalks
  • Builds content area knowledge but not meeting the
    needs of all students with current use expand
    intervention opportunities
  • Wilson Strategies
  • Discontinue whole group for use with some
    students

30
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Instruction-New Strategies
  • Develop Engaging Activities/New Ideas
  • Increase enthusiasm for reading
  • Share ideas/resources
  • Provide more small group instruction
  • Purchase Support Materials
  • Math manipulatives
  • Science kits
  • P. D. for Staff on Teaching Strategies
  • All schools
  • Provide Opportunities to Share Best Practices
  • Use staff as resources/observation of peers

31
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Assessment-Current Strategies
  • Reading Street Assessments
  • Given to all students prepares students for MCAS
  • They are difficult selection tests not valid
    indicator of progress
  • Need to work collaboratively to modify selection
    tests
  • MCAS
  • Can not influence here for now
  • Too much time spent teaching to the test
    integrate MCAS prep into regular classroom
    instruction
  • AIMSweb
  • Used to monitor progress not diagnostic helps
    with regrouping
  • Need more consistent use by staff
  • Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA)
  • Use with specific student cases

32
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Assessment-New Strategies
  • STAR Reading and STAR Math Software
  • Training needs to occur
  • Need more computers
  • Lexia Reading Software
  • Need more licenses immediate feedback to
    students
  • SuccessMaker Courseware
  • Need training
  • Need more computers network needs to be upgraded

33
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Writing-Current Strategies
  • John Collins
  • Not everyone trained no follow-up unclear
    expectations
  • Implement must-haves for all grade levels
  • LINKS
  • Not everyone trained (new staff)
  • Great graphic organizer tools
  • Integrate with Reading Street
  • Sitton Spelling
  • Discontinue Use

34
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Writing-New Strategies
  • Reading Street Six Traits Writing Program
  • Fully integrated into the reading program
  • Training needed
  • Effective use of the writing program
  • Need to clarify district priorities
  • Time
  • Share what works with colleagues get input from
    peers

35
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Collaboration-Current Strategies
  • Grade Level Common Planning Time
  • Teachers in grades have common time but lack of
    opportunities across grades and with specials
  • Meetings take away available time
  • More structure provided by administration
  • Professional Development Days
  • Gather input from staff
  • Increase content specific opportunities provide
    follow-up
  • Curriculum Accommodation Team (CAT) Meetings
  • Less paperwork include all grades in process
  • More follow through revisit cases include new
    students
  • Mentor Program
  • Continue

36
PIM Findings-ELA
  • Collaboration-New Strategies
  • Collaboration Sharing Best Practices
  • Within the district
  • Get to know colleagues better
  • Opportunities to Visit Districts
  • Other schools
  • Programs
  • Co-Teaching Opportunities
  • Break down barriers between staff
  • Time to effectively plan and implement lessons

37
Summary of PIM Process
  • We have a focused direction for change based on
    input from all staff
  • First cycle of looking at our school
  • Results driven focused on improving achievement
  • Ongoing process evaluate and revise initiatives
  • Next cycle could occur next year
  • Focus will be narrowed work at more detailed
    level
  • Process may expand into other grades/schools
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com