Children and Families South East Performance, 20034 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Children and Families South East Performance, 20034

Description:

Children and Families South East Performance, 20034 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: mcc103
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Children and Families South East Performance, 20034


1
Children and Families South East Performance,
2003/4
  • Sara Goodinge
  • Business Relationship Manager Hampshire

2
  • The data is extracted from CSCIs performance
  • and information delivery system (PADI)
  • via the Autumn analysis tools
  • 30 November 2004
  • The slides show data for all South East councils
    to allow comparisons to be made which raise
    useful questions about possible factors that lead
    to different performance
  • As always, it is important to exercise caution
    when using statistical information. Variations
    may arise because of differences in interpreting
    the definitions,
  • data collection and recording problems

3

LAC per 10,000 of population 31 March
4
  • LAC per 10,000 of population 31 March
  • South East average decreased from 44.4 to 43.9.
    Removing the
  • extreme averages of Wokingham (15.1), Bracknell
    Forest (24),
  • Southampton (68) Brighton (87) the average
    drops to 42.78
  • England average increased from 58.6 to 60
  • 9 councils appear in the lower quartile, 41 and
    below - Bracknell Forest, Bucks, Hampshire,
    Milton Keynes, Oxford, Slough, Surrey, Windsor
    Mhead and Wokingham
  • 1 council appears in the upper quartile, 74 and
    above - Brighton Hove, 87.2
  • Reduced numbers for 9 councils, compared to last
    year

5

A1. of LAC at 31 March with 3 or more
placements
6
  • A1. of LAC at 31 March with 3 or more
    placements
  • This PI is an important measure of the stability
    of care experienced by a child.
  • Stability is associated with better outcomes
  • South East average, 11.8, compares favourably
    with the England average, 12.2. Also an
    improvement on the 2002/3 average, 12.3
  • 5 councils appear in the lower quartile, 11 and
    below - Bucks, Medway, Slough, Southampton and
    West Berks
  • Significant drop in Medway data, 12 to 2.4, 2nd
    lowest in England
  • 4 councils appear in the upper quartile, 15 and
    above - Brighton Hove, Reading, Windsor
    Mhead and Wokingham consider size of LAC
    population
  • Wokingham reported the 2nd highest in England,
    20.8 and Brighton the 9th, 18.4
  • Reduced for 6 councils, compared to last year

7
D35. of CLA for at least 4 years placed
in FC at least 2 years
8
  • D35. of CLA for at least 4 years placed in FC
    at least 2 years
  • This PI is designed to illustrate the relative
    effectiveness of councils in
  • achieving longer term stability
  • South East average dropped to 48.6, compared to
    49.6, last
  • year. Similar to the current England average,
    48.3
  • 5 councils appear in the upper quartile, 53.5
    and above - East Sussex, Isle of Wight, Medway,
    West Berks and West Sussex
  • Medway achieved the highest in England, 64.8
  • 5 councils appear in the lower quartile, 42.9
    and below Surrey, Slough,
  • Windsor Mhead, Portsmouth, Milton Keynes and
    Bracknell Forest
  • Bracknell Forest reported the 3rd lowest in
    England, 13
  • Improved for 11 councils, compared to last year

9
B7. LAC _at_ 31 March, placed for adoption or
in FC placement
10
  • B7. LAC _at_ 31 March, placed for adoption or in
    FC placement
  • Good performance is deemed as generally high,
    although a very high figure does
  • raise questions. It is likely there will always
    be a small number of children needing
  • residential care
  • South East average dropped to 81.1, compared to
    82.1 last
  • year. Similar to the current England average,
    81.2
  • 5 South East councils appear in the upper
    quartile, 85.5 and above
  • Medway achieved the 3rdh highest in England,
    92.1
  • 6 councils appear in the lower quartile, 77.9
    and below - Oxford, Bucks,
  • Bracknell Forest, Windsor Mhead, Wokingham
    and Surrey
  • Improved for 6 councils, compared to last year

11
C22. LAC, aged 10 under, placed for
adoption adoption or in FC placement
12
  • C22. LAC aged 10 under. placed for adoption
    or in FC
  • Most childrens needs are such that they will
    make better developmental progress in
  • a family setting, rather than residential care.
    In most the FC option also costs less
  • than residential care. Matter to consider - need
    to ensure good support services
  • exist
  • South East average increased to 97.3 and is
    similar to the average for England, 97.5
  • 7 councils appear in the upper quartile, 99.1
    and above.
  • 3 Councils achieved 100, Bucks, Portsmouth,
    Slough and Wokingham
  • 3 councils appear in the lower quartile, 96.6
    and below - Windsor Mhead, Surrey and
    Bracknell Forest
  • Windsor Mhead reported the 2nd lowest in
    England, 85.2
  • Reduced for 8 councils, compared to last year

13
C23. of LAC adopted _at_ 31 March
14
  • C23. of LAC adopted _at_ 31 March (new definition)
  • The Government believes that more can and should
    be done to promote the wider
  • use of adoption. By 2004/5 councils are expected
    to increase by 40 the number
  • LAC who are adopted
  • South East average, 8.3, is better than the
    average for England, 7.8
  • The Windsor Mhead (1.7 to 10.3) and
    Bracknell Forest (3.6 to 12.5) 2004/5 plans, if
    successful, will significantly improve the
    regional 2004/5 average
  • 5 councils appear in the upper quartile, 9.2 and
    above
  • 12 councils are planning to increase their
    2004/5

15
A3. of children registered during the year
on the CPR previously registered
16
  • A3. of children registered during year on the
    CPR previously
  • registered
  • Good performance is deemed as generally low.
    However, a very low level of
  • re-registrations may mean a council is not
    re-registering some CIN. A high
  • Figure may be explained by geographical issues
    and small coharts
  • Very important for councils to understand year on
    year movement
  • South East average, 13.5, is higher than the
    average for England, 13
  • 6 councils appear in the lower quartile, 10.1
    and below - Isle of Wight, Slough, Wokingham,
    West Sussex, Medway and Windsor Maidenhead
  • Isle of Wight having the lowest in the South
    East, 4.6
  • 5 Councils appear in the upper quartile, 15.3
    and above
  • Milton Keynes reported the 6th highest in
    England, 22.9

17
C21. of children de-reg from the CPR, who had
been on the CPR continuously for 2 years or more
18
  • C21. of children de-reg from the CPR
    continuously on the
  • CPR for 2 years or more
  • Professionals, the child and family should be
    working towards specified outcomes
  • which lead to the childs name being taken off
    the CPR within 2 years. Good
  • performance is deemed as generally low. If
    performance is poor (high) this may
  • possibly explain poor performance associated with
    C20 CP reviews
  • South East average, 8.2, similar to last year,
    8.3. The does not compare favourably with
    average for England, 7.6, big improvement on
    last year, 9.4
  • 4 councils appear in the upper quartile, 11 and
    above - Bucks, Isle of Wight, Milton Keynes and
    Portsmouth
  • Milton Keynes, 15.8 and Isle of Wight, 15.7
    appear in the list of 10 councils reporting the
    highest
  • 5 councils apear in the lower quartile, 4.1 and
    below - West Sussex, Oxford, Hampshire, East
    Sussex and Windsor Maidenhead
  • 11 councils reduced their , compared to last
    year

19
C20. of required CP cases reviewed during
year
20
  • C20. of required CP cases reviewed during year
  • (new definition)
  • This PI tries to measure the effectiveness of the
    interventions provided to children
  • on the CPR. Although WT has always asked for
    this to happen another change to
  • consider at the earliest stages
  • Good performance is deemed as 100
  • South East average, 96.9, compares favourably
    with the average for England, 95.7
  • 7 of the 19 South East councils achieved 100,
    upper quartile
  • 6 councils appear in the lower quartile, 95.5
    and below
  • Lowest South East average attributed to
    Portsmouth, 84.7
  • Kent, Medway, Oxford, Portsmouth and Reading
    plans for 2004/5 are not targeting 100

21
E45. CIN from minority ethnic grps to
proportion of children in the local population
from minority ethnic grps
22
  • E45. CIN from minority ethnic grps to proportion
    of children in
  • the local population from minority ethnic groups
  • Only the band rating of 2 and 3 blobs are used
    until we become more confident
  • about how to interpret this indicator
  • A value of less than 1 would suggest that
    children from minority ethnic groups
  • have poorer access to services than white
    children.
  • A value of 2 and above may indicate they are
    disproportionately identifying
  • people from minority ethnic groups
  • Consider Deprived areas, usually links to
    increased CIN BME
  • South East average, 1.4
  • England average, 1.3
  • 3 councils average, 1 and below - Slough, Surrey
    and Southampton

23
A2. of YP leaving care aged 16 with at
least 1 GCSE at grades A-G, or GNVQ (new
definition)
24
  • A2. of YP leaving care aged 16 with at least 1
    GCSE at grades
  • A-G, or GNVQ (new definition)
  • There is a need for co-operation between SSDs,
    LEAs and schools to improve the
  • attainment of CLA. Useful to compare to the
    councils overall performance
  • Good performance is deemed as generally high and
    increasing
  • South East average, 53.3, is better than the
    average for England, 50.7
  • Only 3 councils appear in the upper quartile,
    59.8 and above - Portsmouth, Slough and
    Southampton
  • Slough achieved the 4th highest in England, 75
  • 5 Councils appear in the lower quartile, 42.7
    and below
  • Isle of Wight reported the lowest in the South
    East Region, 16.6
  • 14 councils planning to improve their during
    2004/5

25
C18. Final warnings, reprimands and
convictions of LAC
26
  • C18. Final warnings, reprimands and convictions
    of LAC aged 10
  • or over
  • A figure of 1 would indicate that CLA are given
    final warnings/reprimands or
  • convicted at the same rate as all children in the
    area effective local policy has a
  • major impact on performance
  • We would hope to see the rate fall to match the
    figure for all children in the local
  • population
  • Despite a reduction on last years average, 3.7,
    the current South East average, 3.5, is higher
    than the average for England, 3.1
  • 3 councils appear in the lower quartile, 2.2 and
    below - Bucks, Medway and West Berks
  • 9 Councils appear in the upper quartile, 3.7 and
    above.
  • 6 councils improved their performance compared to
    last year

27
C19. Health of LAC
28
  • C19. Health of LAC
  • We would expect to see high proportions of LAC
    receiving this basic health
  • care LAC for at least 12 months who had their
    teeth checked by a dentist or had an
  • annual health assessment during the previous 12
    months
  • Good preformance is deemed as generally high
  • South East average, 78.8 compares favourably
    with the average for England, 76.9
  • 5 councils appear in the upper quartile, 84.8
    and above
  • Windsor Maidenhead reported the 9th highest
    in England, 91.7n
  • 2 councils appear in the lower quartile, 71.7
    and below - Hampshire, 57.2 and Surrey, 58.6
  • Hampshire reported the 9th lowest in England
  • 14 councils are planning to improve their
    during 2004/5

29
C24. of LAC who missed at least 25 days
schooling during the previous school year
30
  • C24. of LAC who missed at least 25 days
    schooling during the
  • previous school year
  • Access to school is a key factor in improving the
    stability of the lives of CLA.
  • Continous attendance will lead to improving
    education achievement. Procedures
  • must be in place, ensuring absence is closely
    momonitored dealt with accordingly
  • Good performace is deemed as generally low
  • South East average significantly reduced, 14.3
    to 12.6. The average for England increased,
    12.6 to 12.5
  • 7 councils appear in the lower quartile 9.3 and
    below
  • 4 councils appear in the upper quartile, 16.3
    and above - Southampton, Portsmouth, Reading and
    Bracknell Forest
  • Reading, 23.9, reported the 3rd highest in
    England and Southampton, 23.8, the 4th highest
  • 14 councils improved their performance compared
    to last year

31
A4. of YP looked after 1 April in their 17th
yr (aged 16) in educ/trng/employment aged 19
32
  • A4. of YP looked after 1 April in their 17th yr
    (aged 16) in
  • educ/trng/employment aged 19
  • Research shows care leavers experience high
    levels of unemployment and are at
  • risk of homelessness and social exclusion. This
    PI shows the performance of
  • councils in improving outcomes for YP leaving
    care
  • Good performance is deemed as generally high
  • South East average, 55.3 and England, 56.8.
    Both were 50.1 last year
  • 7 councils appear in the lower quartile, 50 and
    below - Bracknell, Hampshire, Medway,
    Southampton, Milton Keynes, Reading and Wokingham
  • Wokingham lowest in South East, 20
  • 4 councils appear in the upper quartile, 64.9
    and above - Windsor
  • Mhead, W Berks, Southampton and Kent
  • Windsor Mhead highest in South East, 87.5

33
B8. Average gross weekly expenditure per LAC
in foster care or in a children's home
34
  • B8. Average gross weekly expenditure per LAC in
    foster care or in
  • a children's home
  • Very low costs may suggest quality of care is
    poor. South East councils appear in
  • ACA groups 3 4. As expected, costs were higher
    in these groups, along with
  • London
  • South East average, 663.40 is higher than the
    average for England, 632.50
  • Medways cost, 370, reported the lowest in
    England
  • Wokinghams cost reported the highest cost in
    England
  • Wokinghams outturn cost is significantly higher
    than their plan, 1121

35
B9. Average gross weekly expenditure per LAC
in a children's home
36
  • B9. Average gross weekly expenditure per LAC in a
    children's
  • Home
  • High costs indicate likely poor commissioning.
    Low costs may mean care is of
  • a poor quality or that children with lesser needs
    are being placed inappropriately in
  • residential settings
  • South East average, 2005.10, is slightly lower
    than the average for England, 2066.70.
  • Bracknell Forest reported the lowest cost,
    1293.40
  • Wokingham, 3264.10, reported the 3rd highest
    cost in England relates to the low number of
    LAC
  • Wokinghams outturn cost is vastly higher than
    their plan, 2320

37
B10. Average gross weekly expenditure per LAC
in foster care
38
  • B10. Average gross weekly expenditure per LAC in
    foster care
  • Increased efficiency lowers the unit cost.
    Driving down the unit cost at the expense
  • of outcomes would not be appropriate
  • A high cost is likely to indicate poor
    commissioning. A low cost may indicate poor
  • quality care or placed inappropriately in foster
    care
  • South East average, 384.40 is higher than the
    average for England, 362.90
  • Wokingham, 643, reported the 2nd highest cost in
    England
  • Wokinghams outturn cost is vastly higher than
    their plan, 500

39
E44. Relative spend on family support
40
  • E44. Relative spend on family support
  • Adequate provision of such services can prevent
    children being looked after later
  • A low figure would indicate a council was
    providing a relatively small amount of
  • preventative services. Compared to last year, 10
    councils reduced their
  • expenditure
  • South East average, 37.4 is lower than the
    average for England, 38.4
  • 4 councils appear in the lower quartile, 33.60
    and below, Bucks, Portsmouth, Oxford and
    Wokingham
  • 2 councils appear in the upper quartile, 42.8
    and above, Kent and Surrey
  • Compared to last year, 8 councils reduced their
    expenditure
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com