Conclusions from Monte Carlo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Conclusions from Monte Carlo

Description:

Local Whittle estimator of d is superior in terms of bias to the MLE. However, the Local Whittle estimator has considerably higher variance than the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: richard881
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conclusions from Monte Carlo


1
(No Transcript)
2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Conclusions from Monte Carlo
  • The constants in the linear and non linear
    autoregressive polynomials are estimated very
    accurately.
  • Local Whittle estimator of d is superior in terms
    of bias to the MLE. However, the Local Whittle
    estimator has considerably higher variance than
    the MLE across all experiments.
  • One-step MLE is generally superior in terms of
    both bias and variance for all the other
    parameters. Cautions against using Local Whittle
    estimator to fractionally filter the series
    before estimating the remaining parameters.
  • The estimates of g are generally poor for all
    designs. The quality of the estimator improves
    with increasing degrees of persistence in the AR
    processes and also with increasing sample sizes.
  • The parameter which is associated with the degree
    of persistence in the linear autoregressive
    processes is generally estimated with a downward
    bias, while the parameter which represents with
    the degree of persistence in the non-linear
    autoregressive processes is estimated with an
    upward bias across experiments. Total persistence
    is extremely well estimated.
  • The value of d does not appear to be related to
    the quality of any of the MLE parameter
    estimates, including d itself.

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com