Title: Ethical dilemmas with resource constraints in aged care
1Ethical dilemmas with resource constraints in
aged care
- Dr John I Fleming
- Director, Southern Cross Bioethics Institute
2Must we ration in healthcare?
- Healthcare is unsuited to the free market.
- Healthcare is about the flourishing and
well-being of people. - Healthcare has a voracious appetite for funding.
- There are many other worthy social pursuits to
fund. - Therefore rationing in healthcare is unavoidable.
3We need an ethical framework for rationing
- Rationing implies systematic decisionmaking.
- Rationing decisions should be transparent and
morally justified. - Which approaches to rationing are unacceptable,
and why? - What is a morally appropriate system of rationing?
4Ageist rationing
- The clinical argument
- (capacity to benefit)
- The philosophical argument
- (a fair innings)
5Objections to ageist rationing
- Age is a poor surrogate for prognosis
- Aggravated ageing
- A typical or reasonable lifespan?
- Who judges quality of life?
- The eugenic impulse
6Objections to ageist rationing
- Spending on the elderly is not disproportionate
- Social contributions over a lifetime
- The fundamental objection It breaches the
principles of non-discrimination, equal access to
the satisfaction of needs, social solidarity and
respect for the elderly.
7Healthworkers should not be gatekeepers.
- Their concern must be for the individual patient.
- They lack the information to make rationing
decisions. - Their involvement in rationing may cause a breach
of trust. - Instead, they should do all that is truly
possible, both practically and morally.
8Inappropriate philosophies for rationing
- Liberal-welfarism
- Utilitarianism
9The liberal-welfarist philosophy
- Committed to liberty, equality and fraternity,
but also neutrality about the human good. - Liberty/autonomy
- Equality of opportunity
- Fraternity
- Many questions remain unanswered, leaving an
inadequate basis for healthcare allocation.
10The utilitarian philosophy
- A calculation of costs and benefits
- QALYs are the most common application
- QALYs are systematically biased against the
elderly - Utilitarianism is seriously flawed
11Utilitarianism a brief critique
- People are not reducible to numbers
- Comparing the incommensurable
- Human rights are ignored
- What is cost and what is benefit?
- It requires moral luck
- No justice or charity
12Inappropriate principles for rationing
- Neutral principles
- Majority principles
- Arbitrary principles
13Neutral principles
- For a liberal, pluralistic society?
- Avoid choosing one conception of the good
- Assumes the separation of public and private
life - Ultimately precludes state involvement in
healthcare - Favours the status quo
14Majority principles
- Opinion polls
- Confirm majority prejudices
- Methodological flaws
- Marginalises the vulnerable and inarticulate
minority - We always need to critique the views of the
majority - We need responsible leadership
15Arbitrary principles
- Rules or standards with no coherent basis.
- Principlism autonomy, beneficence,
nonmaleficence, justice. - Principles must be balanced and compromised.
- Ultimately autonomy trumps all.
- Social justice is an also-ran.
16What are appropriate principles for rationing?
- What is healthcare about?
- What are our basic values?
- A conception of the human good
- Justice
- Human needs
17Justice
- Part of morality
- Right relations between people
- Commonality of life and interests
- The common good
- Giving to others their due
- Distributive justice
18A conception of the human good
- We desire life and health
- The ultimate goals behind our choices
- Fundamental to rational deliberation
- We do not choose what they will be
- They are given in our very nature
19Life and health
- Human personal existence is a bodily existence.
- Life and health are sought for their own sake.
- They are intrinsically valuable.
- But they are not the only goods.
- What is integral to our flourishing gives rise to
our basic needs.
20Human needs
- Not all healthcare meets genuine needs.
- Healthcare needs do not create absolute duties.
- Not all ways of satisfying needs are morally
warranted. - We must seek what we need, but only in morally
reasonable ways - Not all needs are equal.