TsungJen Shih - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

TsungJen Shih

Description:

TsungJen Shih – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: benqcu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TsungJen Shih


1
Does Culture Matter? The influence of cultural
values on public perception nanotechnology
  • Tsung-Jen Shih
  • School of Journalism and Mass Communication
  • University of WisconsinMadison
  • Oct 7, 2009

2
Overview
  • Researchers have paid attention to public opinion
  • Current research Knowledge vs heuristics
  • More attention should be dedicated to difference
    at the national level
  • Why is it important?
  • Integrated regulation
  • Commercialization
  • Cooperation and competition

3
This study
4
Methods
  • 21 countries , with Hierarchical Linear Modeling
  • Individual level
  • US Survey, 2007
  • Eurobarometer 64.3, 2005
  • Country level
  • Human development values-----------World Value
    Survey
  • Cultural worldviews---------Hofstede Schwartz
    value survey

5
  • Many possibilities created by nanotech also, at
    the same time, challenge peoples basic values
    about life.
  • Many religious groups have criticized
    nanotechnology for creating the potential for
    human enhancement and even the creation of life
  • The role of religiosity, traditional value,
    survival value

6
Cultural values
7
(No Transcript)
8
Predicting moral acceptability
Country level
9
  • As cultural theory suggests, risk is selected.
  • How a technology will develop depends on what
    kind of society we want.

Hierarchy
Individualism
Collectivism
Egalitarianism
10
Perception of benefits risks
11
Predicting risk benefits
12
Estimated means
13
Discussion about benefits and risks
  • Perceptual filters
  • Religiosity and confidence affect the way people
    interpret benefits and risks
  • Their effects vary with cultures (survival value
    has an weakening effect on confidence)
  • Perception of benefits and risks also reflect
    preferred ways of life

14
  • Integrating the variables explored previously
  • Two models
  • Human development values
  • Cultural worldviews
  • Effects at the country level were not obvious

15
  • Individual value predispositions, along with the
    evaluation of core properties of nanotechnology,
    are the most important determinants of public
    opinion
  • The important role of values indicated that
    people care more than the technology itself
  • However, the environment in which the individual
    lives also matters as it provides the sources
    from which peoples values originate
  • Aggregate values and worldviews affect both the
    perception of nanotechnology and the effect of
    individual-level variables

16
  • Thank you!

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
  • Why is confidence assumed to affect moral
    acceptability
  • Scheufele et al (2008) suggested that moral
    acceptability was associated with trust in
    scientists at the individual level. As a type of
    general trust, I therefore control confidence as
    a potential mediator.
  • Although the causal direction b/w confidence and
    moral acceptability is not clear, this study
    showed that religiosity played a role at the
    individual level even after confidence was
    controlled.

20
  • Does religious denomination really have no
    effects?
  • The conclusion that the strength of religiosity
    matters more than religious denomination was
    based on country-level results.
  • The results suggested that religious denomination
    did not explain the varied effects of religiosity
    on moral acceptability found in different
    cultures. They also did not affect moral
    perception with respect to nanotechnology.
  • However, the effect of religious denomination at
    the individual level is not clear.

21
HLM
  • Analysis mostly based on HLM
  • Violation of OLS assumption (independence)
  • Taking into account aggregate and individual
    level variables simultaneously
  • Allowing me to examine whether the effect of
    individual-level predictors vary with cultures

22
US
23
Predicting support in the US
24
Comparison of US public opinion surveys in 2004
and 2007
25
Predicting benefits risks
  • Why is cultural theory relevant? The definition
    of risk pertains to a societys preferred
    lifestyles and social relations
  • Individualism (vs collectivism)
  • Egalitarianism (vs hierarchy)
  • Religiosity and confidence as perceptual
    filters

26
  • No individual data regarding cultural worldviews
    and values
  • Questions are too general
  • benefits and risks
  • regulations
  • Not sure whether each construct has the same
    meaning in different cultures

27
Predicting moral acceptability
  • The association b/w religiosity and moral
    acceptability
  • the influence at the individual level
  • the influence at the aggregate level
  • invariant association across cultures?
  • The association b/w human development values and
    moral acceptability
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com