2D CHARGE READOUT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

2D CHARGE READOUT

Description:

800 wires split into three batches of 32, 256 and 512 and grouped as separate ... for 800 wires to 20 with a grouping index of 5 if grouped in one batch useful? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: chamka
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2D CHARGE READOUT


1
2D CHARGE READOUT
  • Chamkaur Ghag
  • School of Physics
  • University of Edinburgh

2
DRIFT I
DRIFT Collaboration
BDMC
  • Directional Recoil Identification From Tracks
    detector at Boulby Mine
  • 1 m3 cubic Negative Ion Drift TPC
  • Central cathode at 20 kV, 270 V/cm drift field
  • Electro-negative gas reduces diffusion
  • MWPC 2D readout planes with an anode-pitch of 2mm
    and 1m2 area

3
DRIFT II
  • DRIFT based on long range of expected WIMP
    induced nuclear recoils in low P gas
  • Tracks reconstructed to give E loss recoil
    direction
  • One of DRIFT II objectives to get better
    reconstruction by increasing spatial resolution
    of charge readout plane
  • Tracks require sampling at narrower pitch than
    DRIFT I - not possible using MWPCs. Need
    different system

DRIFT Collaboration
4
GEMs
Avalanche occurs in holes etched in Kapton sheet
CERN Group
5
MICROMEGAS
Charpak Giomataris 1992
  • Cu/Ni micromesh with holes 40microns square
    etched at a pitch of 50microns held above
    readout plane by Kapton spacers
  • HV to mesh creates a large E field in the
    mesh/anode gap
  • Avalanche occurs with high gains 104 between
    micromesh and readout plane. Acts as a
    parallel-plate avalanche chamber by inducing
    charge in strips.

6
Why MICROMEGAS?
  • Can get high gain and spatial resolution
  • Less likely to generate radiological background
    (made from Kapton, Cu, Ni)
  • Robust, cheap, simple to make, resistant to spark
    damage (compared to GEMs)
  • Can be tiled for larger areas - possible design
    for DRIFT II is 4 separate Micromegas detector
    readout planes each 25cm2 tiled together for
    total active area of 0.25m2

DRIFT Collaboration
7
CHARGE READOUT
  • Cross strip grid on a Kapton PCB with all strips
    at 300micron pitch
  • X direction 820 strips 100micron wide
    Y direction 820 strips 150micron
    wide
  • Maintains equal exposed areas resulting in
    well-correlated charge sharing ? important for
    efficient detection on both coordinates
  • PCB 25micron thick (Pyrolax flexible AP8525),
    standard copper wires 17.5microns thick can get
    lower

Universidade de Santiago
8
CODED GROUPS
  • Large number of tracks and each track requires
    electronics (preamps, amps, digitizers, etc)
    ? EXPENSIVE!
  • First and last 10 of 820 tracks have individual
    outputs to group into veto, calibration, testing,
    etc
  • Remaining 800 coded grouped to minimize the
    number of output channels

9
SIMPLE CODED GROUP
  • e.g., 9 wires read out with 6 outputs
  • 9 wires grouped into three subsets for group
    signal on left
  • Corresponding wires in each group connected for
    code signal on right
  • Which of the group and code signals are triggered
    uniquely identifies wire
  • Signal cannot propagate to outputs of other wires
    due to op-amps arranged as inverting amplifiers
  • Grouping index is 2 each wire must have two
    connections to it (one group plus one code)

If c is no. of channels, N is no. of wires, then
T. Lawson
10
Better Coded Groups
  • More efficient technique is to group the
    groups
  • Means higher grouping index each wire is member
    of more groups hence connected to more outputs
  • e.g., 32 wires are read out with 10 channels with
    grouping index i5
  • 1-32 are wire numbers and A-J the 10 output
    channels. Each wire must be connected to 5
    separate output channels

c i N(1/ i)
11
CODED GROUPS OVERVIEW
  • 800 wires split into three batches of 32, 256 and
    512 and grouped as separate detectors for testing
  • N 32, i 2, c 12
  • N 256, i 4, c 16
  • N 512, i 3, c 24
  • i of 512 lower than 256 so can remove effects of
    scaling up N to test efficiency of grouping
    scheme as function of i as well as N c
  • Total number of output channels for the 800 wires
    is 52. Thus for 820 wires, 72 readout channels
  • Can reduce total number of output channels for
    800 wires to 20 with a grouping index of 5 if
    grouped in one batch useful?

12
Connecting channels to wires
  • Majority of 52 output channels must be connected
    to 64 separate tracks
  • To physically do this, can have wire from output
    running across tracks extended out from the main
    active area of the grid
  • Such extensions would add 3cm to the 25cm
  • Output wire is connected to tracks with vias
    (shown as yellow points) to link output channels
    to their associated tracks as dictated by
    grouping scheme.

13
VIA Connections
  • The track is widened into a circle where the
    connection with the output channel wire is to be
    made
  • A hole is made through this and lined with
    5micron thick Tin-Lead solder
  • layout design depends on size of such vias
    (including required clearance), i.e, if via
    diameter is greater than the 300micron pitch,
    they will not fit in the extended regions

PhotoMachining Inc
14
Non-Adjacent Grouping
  • By coding and grouping all 800 tracks such that
    no 2 consecutive tracks are connected to the same
    output channel we can increase the available
    pitch to 500microns (20 thou)

15
LAYOUT DESIGN
  • Standard vias 600microns wide. To accommodate
    these two options are
  • (1)
  • All four sides of detector utilized alternate
    tracks are read out on each side of the active
    area giving 600 micron pitch
  • -Extended regions add 3cm to all sides
  • -May cause complications with tiling
  • -Output up from 72 to 104 due to repeated
    channels
  • (2)
  • In conjunction with non-adjacent grouping, the
    extended regions are fanned out for tracks to
    reach required pitch
  • -Fanned region adds further 4cm

16
TILED READOUT
If fan out required
Extended region of flexible circuits can be
folded back
4 detectors can now be tiled for a 0.25m2 area
Can now halve number of output channels over 4
detectors by coupling outputs of adjacent sides
of separate detectors
17
NEXT
Vacuum Chamber with drift field
Opening front flange MICROMEGAS mounted on inside
connections out from rear flange
48cm
Drift
micromesh
120cm
strip readout
  • 25cm2 readout grid as Micromegas to be
    manufactured and mounted in vacuum chamber at
    University of Sheffield with much of DAQ
    requirements at Edinburgh
  • Readout mounted on inside of opening flange with
    connections out through rear flange cage fitted
    to define drift field

18
Tests
  • Initial tests possibly to fire alpha source
    across the chamber for easily detectable
    charge-density tracks to establish
  • ability to observe and reconstruct track shape
    dimensions
  • effect on reconstruction efficiency and spatial
    resolution by changing lateral diffusion of
    charge cloud by altering drift field, drift
    distance, or the gas such as comparing CS2 with
    Arisobutane which has no diffusion suppression
  • how well signal from individual wire is
    prevented spreading to outputs of other wires and
    feasibility of reduction of output channels from
    72 to 42 for 820 tracks
  • efficiency of micromeshes including homemade
    woven wire with less action at points than
    manufactured mesh due to rounded edges

19
SUMMARY
  • Charge readout strip development for MICROMEGAS
    with high spatial resolution
  • 25cm2 readout grids with 820 tracks at 300micron
    pitch and tiling capability
  • Tracks coded and grouped to reduce number of
    output channels to 72 for 820 tracks
  • Grouped tracks connected with vias through
    extended regions to output channel wires
    running across
  • Final design dependent on via size non-adjacent
    grouping scheme and fanning-out practical
    solutions
  • Tests to be conducted in vacuum chamber to check
    feasibility of coded groups and setup for further
    development such as increased reduction in output
    numbers

20
Thanks
  • Dr Tom Davinson1
  • Dr Tim Lawson, University of Sheffield
  • Dr Alex Murphy1
  • Mr Colin Thomson1
  • 1 University of Edinburgh
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com