Optimally Resolving Lambertian Surface Orientation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Optimally Resolving Lambertian Surface Orientation

Description:

Using asymptotic expansions of the type: We can derive necessary conditions on SNR: ... require that the maximum allowable variance is 1o, then: Shallow s1, s2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: buy7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Optimally Resolving Lambertian Surface Orientation


1
Optimally Resolving Lambertian Surface Orientation
  • Ioannis Bertsatos
  • Nicholas C. Makris
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2
Motivation
  • Resolve surface slope and shape from intensity
    images corrupted by speckle noise
  • Attain specified design criteria from 2D sonar or
    optical measurements
  • Design specifications are met when both
    conditions are satisfied
  • Estimate becomes unbiased, and attains the
    Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB)
  • CRLB is within the design specifications

Goals
source
receiver
surface normal
3
Overview
  • Orientation from Reflected Intensity
  • Measurement Statistics
  • Asymptotic Optimality Conditions
  • 1D Surface Slope Estimation
  • 2D Albedo and Slope Estimation
  • 3D General Surface Orientation Estimation
  • This research is a combination and extension of
    earlier work
  • by N. C. Makris, 1997 and Naftali and Makris,
    2001

4
Surface Orientation from Reflected Intensity
  • Lamberts Law
  • Measure
  • Non-linear estimation problem

surface radiance
random
known constant
5
Measurement PDF
  • a a1 aj orientation parameters
  • R R1 R2 Rk RN
  • Rk are Independent Identically Distributed (IID)
    measurements corrupted by signal-dependent noise
    (speckle) due to Circular Complex Gaussian Random
    (CCGR) field fluctuations
  • ltRkgt ? sk(a)
  • µk is a measure of the number of independent
    intensity fluctuations in the measurement Rk
  • Can be interpreted as the signal-to-noise ratio
  • SNR ? ltRkgt2/var(Rk) µk

6
Necessary Conditions for Asymptotic Optimality of
MLE
  • Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE)
  • For large sample sizes or SNR, the MLE becomes
    unbiased, and attains the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound
    (CRLB)
  • Using asymptotic expansions of the type
  • We can derive necessary conditions on SNR

for unbiased estimate for minimum variance
estimate
7
Slope Estimation
  • parameter a ?i
  • lt R gt s(?i) ? cos?i

8
  • To attain design specifications on resolution of
    ?i
  • Determine necessary SNR to achieve unbiased,
    minimum variance estimate, then
  • Specify SNR so that the CRLB is within the design
    specs

9
Illustrative Example
  • For the 1D case, the necessary conditions on SNR
    introduced earlier become
  • If ?i 10o, then in order to achieve an
    unbiased, minimum variance estimate, we require
    that
  • SNRv is the limiting value. For SNR ? SNRv the
    estimate asymptotically attains minimum variance,
    so that
  • If the design criteria specify a maximum variance
    of 1o, then we require that
  • If, instead, ?i 80o, then to satisfy the same
    design criteria we now only require that

10
2D Parameter estimate Albedo and Slope
  • Incident directions must be distinct so that 2
    independent equations exist for ? and ?i
  • 2 unknowns incident angle (?) and albedo (?)
  • Assume s1, s2 as shown
  • It is impossible to invert for both parameters in
    this arrangement
  • s1 cannot be collinear to s2

11
3D Surface Orientation Estimation
  • Define S source matrix
  • ST s1 s2 sk sN
  • lt Rk gt ? sk(a) ? skT n
  • lt R gt ? S n
  • 3 orientation
  • parameters
  • a ?, ?, f, or
  • a ?, p, q, or
  • a nx, ny, nz

12
Incident Directions must be Distinct
  • 3 unknowns 3 illumination vectors
  • If all si are coplanar, then we cannot estimate
  • the orientation
  • parameters
  • Need 3 distinct
  • illumination vectors
  • (i.e. 3 equations) to estimate all the unknowns
  • s1 (s2 ? s3) ? 0 ? si must span some
    volume

all si on this plane
n
13
Illustrative Examples
  • Estimate of a ?, p, q, given
  • Specified
  • Fixed
  • Varying
  • ? 1/p

14
Illustrative Examples
  • Estimate of a ?, ?, f, given
  • ? 1/p
  • In order to achieve an unbiased, minimum variance
    estimation, we require that
  • SNRv is the limiting value. For SNR ? SNRv the
    estimate asymptotically attains minimum variance,
    so that
  • If design criteria require that the maximum
    allowable variance is 1o, then

15
Shallow s1, s2 Variable s3
Steep s1, s2 Variable s3
SNR for minimum variance estimation
SNR for minimum variance estimation
(dB)
(dB)
16
Review
  • Optimality conditions for the estimation of
    Lambertian surface orientation can be derived
    from asymptotic expansions of the MLE.
  • For slope estimation (with known albedo), it is
    shown that it is more efficient to illuminate the
    surface from shallow grazing angles.
  • For 3D estimation it is shown that the incident
    vectors must also span some volume.
  • Given fixed source/illumination vectors spanning
    non-zero volume, it is possible to come up with
    specific SNR conditions, so that any resolution
    criteria for surface orientation are met.

Conclusion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com