Highlights from the mechanical review committee report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Highlights from the mechanical review committee report

Description:

... the mechanical review committee report. Overall mechanical design ... The CTE mismatch makes it a very unappealing back-up to most of the committee members. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: marina71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Highlights from the mechanical review committee report


1
Highlights from the mechanical review committee
report
  • Overall mechanical design
  • Stress Analyses
  • The magnetic field
  • RF shield
  • The vacuum system
  • The pixel plane
  • Substrate
  • Sensor
  • electronics

2
Overall mechanical design
  • Design review positive. Some issues that we
    should address
  • Table of design loads
  • Cables (during cable dressing procedure and
    steady state)
  • Thermal gradients
  • Transmitted from the beam pipe to the detector?
  • Installation procedure of half planes
  • The vacuum box is the stainless steel used
    non-magnetic?
  • Sealing of the PCB used for cable feed-through
  • Use of a single PCB versus a few PCBs glued
    together
  • Sealing properties of G10 (lateral leaks)

3
An example of leak-proof large pCB made up of 4
panels
  • Large PCBs can be made-up of several boards
    joined together.
  • The CLEO RICH cathode plane is about 2.5 m long
    and was made flat to specs.

4
Operation in a magnetic field
  • Use of magnetic material inside the magnet should
    be avoided to protect the integrity of the
    components for safety issues
  • Steady state magnetic forces
  • Quench effects
  • We should identify immediately the magnetic
    components and find alternative solutions.

5
RF shield
  • The very thin RF/vacuum membrane will not take
    much pressure. Coordination of the initial
    pump-down to guarantee matched pressure. The same
    issue exists during let-up. Is any sort of over
    pressure protection possible?
  • How this system will be leak tested? How could a
    small leak in the RF/vacuum shield be localized?
  • Importance of early prototype work

6
The vacuum system
  • Clarify specs definition (steady state-resilience
    against possible failure modes of different
    components)
  • Interface with the beam specifications.
  • Realistic estimate of the gas loads and possible
    gas accumulation at cold spots.
  • Coordination of vacuum pumping in accelerator and
    vacuum box.
  • Pressure protection to avoid permanent
    deformation of the RF shield
  • Some concerns about the cryo-pumping option (see
    report)

7
The vacuum system and the cryogenic option
  • Suggestion that maintaining the hybrid detector
    at cryogenic temperature (130K?) needs to be
    studied carefully in all its implications for the
    rest of the system
  • Readout electronics
  • Cables
  • Stresses induced by temperature gradients
  • Bump bonds

8
The pixel plane
  • Items reviewed included mechanical design and
    external constraints.
  • In view of the CTE issues, it is important to
    establish
  • The operating temperature required by this
    system
  • sensor assumed to require operating temperature ?
    -5 to -10 ?C
  • Suggestion that the vacuum system may require
    going to cryogenic temperatures must be evaluated
    VERY carefully in all its implications
  • The heat load must be established, including
    whether it is a static or a cycling load, i.e.
    periodicity in electronics power-down up.

9
The substrate choice
  • The fuzzy carbon option has some very good
    aspects generally recognized (low mass, better
    CTE match to Si).
  • Concerns that need to be addressed are
  • Single source reliability, ability to complete
    project/maintain the projected cost/schedule
    agreed upon in the course of the project.
  • The cooling manifold including many joints that
    need to be reliability sealed.

10
Substrate a realistic back-up?
  • Be discussed at length. The CTE mismatch makes it
    a very unappealing back-up to most of the
    committee members.
  • Potential failure of the wire-bonds/bump-bonds
  • Stresses that make it impossible to identify
    where the pixels really are.
  • We heard little about the pocofoam substrates but
    they look really promising?develop a realistic
    back-up solution based on them.

11
Attachment of the hybrid detector to the substrate
  • Glue layer between ROC and substrate
  • Material thickness (radiation length issues),
  • temperature gradient across it,
  • radiation resistance.
  • Temperature profile across the thickness of the
    module

12
The cooling manifold
  • Complex system with several joints. High priority
    item in prototyping effort.
  • The joint between tubes and manifold
  • how to make it solid?
  • How to leak test them (during production after
    the final assembly)?
  • Vibrations generated by flowing fluid (resonant
    frequencies)
  • Leak-proofing the system effects of having a
    leak in the secondary vacuum

13
The cooling system
  • Default option generally liked a lot
  • Perhaps effort should be steered towards aspects
    related to the system design

14
Important items that we should review internally
very soon
  • Alignment issues
  • Method that we will use to determine initial
    alignment of the various pixel planes
  • Factors that may make the planes move
  • Hardware monitoring
  • Assembly issues
  • How is the system going to be assembled, tested
    for integrity at the various steps, which kind of
    stresses we anticipate in this process
  • Testing procedure during assembly leak tests,
    electrical integrity tests, alignment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com