12 May 2004 Alan Barr - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

12 May 2004 Alan Barr

Description:

TeV-scale universal extra dimension model. Kaluza-Klein states of ... Dubbed 'Bosonic Supersymmetry' 12 May 2004. Alan Barr. UK ATLAS Physics. UED KK spectrum ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: alan155
Category:
Tags: alan | barr | dubbed

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 12 May 2004 Alan Barr


1
SUSY Spin Measurementswith ATLAS
hep-ph/0405052
  • Alan Barr

So is it really supersymmetry?
If it quacks like SUSY
What else could it possibly be?
Dont be so sure
2
(S)particle reminder
SM
SUSY
Left squark scalar SUSY partner of left
quark
quarks (LR)leptons (LR) neutrinos (L?)
squarks (LR)sleptons (LR)sneutrinos (L?)
Spin-1/2
Spin-0
AfterMixing
?Z0 W gluon
BinoWino0Wino gluino
BW0
Spin-1
4 x neutralino
Spin-1/2
gluino

h0 H0 A0 H
H0H

2 x chargino
Spin-0
Extended higgs sector (2 doublets)
3
RPC SUSY
1-year low-lumi mSUGRA reach
  • Sparticle decays generate
  • Missing ET (LSP)
  • Jets (squarks/gluino)
  • Leptons (sleptons)
  • If we see these at LHC we have discovered SUSY
  • Not necessarily

Gaugino mass term (GeV)
Plot by D. Tovey
Scalar mass term (GeV)
4
Universal Extra Dimensions
Cheng, Matchev
How to get fooled at the LHC
hep-ph/0205314
  • TeV-scale universal extra dimension model
  • Kaluza-Klein states of SM particles
  • same QNs as SM
  • mn2 m02 n2/R2 boundary terms
  • same spin as SM
  • KK parity
  • Lightest KK state stable, and weakly interacting
  • 1st KK mode pair-produced
  • First KK level looks a lot like SUSY

Radius of extra dimension TeV-1
KK tower of masses n0,1,
Dubbed Bosonic Supersymmetry
5
UED KK spectrum
Cheng, Matchev
hep-ph/0205314
Example decay spectrum
1st excited KK level (example masses)
Stable lightestKK particle(weakly interacting)
After adding boundary terms -gt SUSY-like spectrum
Need to measure spins!
6
SUSY decay chain
Spin-0
  • Use mSUGRA LHC point 5 as example
  • Well studied in context of sparticle masses
  • Nice leptonic signal at LHC

Spin-½
Spin-½, mostly wino
Spin-0
Spin-½, mostly bino
Final state jet l l- ET ( decay of
other sparticle)
7
Spin projection factors
P
In rest frame of with ve z-axis aligned with qL
S
Approximate SM particles as massless -gt okay
since m p
8
Spin projection factors
P
In rest frame of with ve z-axis aligned with qL
S
S0
S
Spin-0
Approximate SM particles as massless -gt okay
since m p
9
Spin projection factors
In rest frame of with ve z-axis aligned with qL
?
p
S
Approximate SM particles as massless -gt okay
since m p
10
Spin projection factors
P
In rest frame of with ve z-axis aligned with qL
mql - measure
S
?
S0
p
S
S
Spin projection factor
Spin-0
Approximate SM particles as massless -gt okay
since m p
11
lnearq invariant mass (1)
Back to backin ?20 frame
nearlepton
quark
Probability
l
?
Phase space
?20
l-
  • Phase space -gt factor of sin ½?
  • Spin projection factor in M2
  • lq -gt sin2 ½?
  • l-q -gt cos2 ½?

m/mmax sin ½?
12
lnearq invariant mass (2)
(Lepton from ?2 decay only not directly
measurable)
0
1
0
1
squarkdecay
anti-squarkdecay
l
l-
l
l-
Obvious asymmetry!
Opposite asymmetry!
-gt if same squarks as anti-squarks effect
cancels
13
How to measure?
  • lnearq shows nice charge asymmetry
  • Excellent probe of spin of
  • Experimental problems in measurement
  • Cant tell near lepton from far lepton
  • Plot lq and lq instead -gt contributions from
    both near and far
  • Cant tell quark jet from anti-quark
  • Sum of q and q-bar is measurable
  • pp collider -gt get squark asymmetry from PDFs

14
Production asymmetry
qg -gt squark gluino
x1 and x2 sampled by MC
Valence quarks
Peak near 0.1, 0.1
Parton distribution functionhas more q than
q-bar for Bjorken x 0.1
-gt pp collider produces more squarks than
anti-squarks
(Twice as much for our point)
15
lfarq invariant mass
(Lepton from slepton decay only not directly
measurable)
squarkdecay
anti-squarkdecay
l-
l
l
l-
Some asymmetry inherited from boost of slepton
in ?20 rest frame
16
Parton Level
l-
l
spin-0flat
Chargeasymmetry
Experimentally measurable-gt q and q-bar -gt near
and far leptons
difference/sum
Shape indicates that?20 is spin-½
17
After detector simulation (ATLFAST)
Change in shape due to charge-blind cuts
l-
parton-level 0.6
Events
spin-½
Charge asymmetry,
spin-0
l
detector-level
Invariant mass
-gt Charge asymmetry survives detector sim-gt Same
shape as parton level (but with BG and smearing)
For cuts see C. Lester thesis
18
Cross-check
  • Monte Carlo is HERWIG (6.5)
  • Can turn off spin correlations
  • distribution for scalar ?20
  • consistent with flat
  • not consistent with spin-½ ?20 of previous page
    (linearly increasing)

No asymmetry if spincorrelations turned off
spin-0flat
spin-½ -gt
spin-0 -gt
production asymmetry
19
Further evidence - slepton spin
  • Dilepton invariant mass.
  • Right-handed slepton
  • l and l- are right handed
  • might expect pronounced spin effects (as for lq
    distributions)
  • none because slepton is scalar
  • Scalar particle carrying lepton number
  • sounds like a slepton to me!

Straightline distn
(phase-space)
Back-to-backin slepton frame
Shape after different-family subtraction
20
Conclusions
  • Method for measuring spins of SUSY particles at
    the LHC
  • Measure lq invariant mass distributions
  • equivalent to angular distributions in
  • Look for lepton charge asymmetry
  • Requires initial asymmetry in squark vs
    anti-squark production
  • valence quarks in PDFs at x 0.1
  • Measure spin-½ nature of ?20
  • Also spin-0 slepton from mll
  • Should be enough to kill straw man e.g.
    universal extra dimensions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com