Title: Survey Research Methods
1Survey Research Methods
Week 1. Designing Questionnaires
Steve Fisher, Robert Andersen Anthony Heath
Department of Sociology UNIVERSITY
of OXFORD
2The Logic of Sampling Measurement
3General Problem of MeasurementReliability
Validity
- Reliability
- Refers to the replicability of the measurement
procedure to yield consistent results - Validity
- Refers to the extent to which the measurement
procedure actually measures the concept that it
is intended to measure
4Reliability ValidityQuestionnaire related
problems
- Wording effectsword choice, loaded questions
- Respondent recall
- Social desirability, knowledge questions,
threatening questions - Question order effects
- Response format differences, recency effects in
closed-ended questions - Dont know responses
- Middle position in polar alternatives
5Question wording problemsAssociated factors
- Word selection
- Seemingly trivial changes in wording can affect
response distributions (e.g., forbid versus not
allow) - Ambiguous, lengthy, double-barrelled questions
- Unless you need to establish context, short
questions are best - Have only one thought per question
- Bad Could you please tell me how many children
you have, and what year each of them was born? - Good What are the ages of your children?
- Biased, leading or loaded questions
- Avoid questions that make the respondent feel
they should respond a certain way
6Question wordingExperimental evidence
7Respondent RecallSituational framing
decomposition
- Telescopingbringing distant events closer to the
present than they actually occurred - Limited by Situational framingi.e., placing the
event in the context of other events, especially
well known events - e.g., How many times have you been to the doctor
since last Christmas? - Inaccurate calculation of a large number of
events during a long time period - Limited by Decompositioni.e., breaking time into
smaller periods - e.g., If you want to determine how much alcohol
people drink in a year, ask them how much they
drink each week and calculate the year value
yourself
8Social desirability, threatening questionsUsing
lead-in statements
- People generally have a desire to present a
positive image which can override the norm to
tell the truth - Errors associated with this can be limited by
adding lead-in statements - e.g. 1 Voter turnout
- Did you vote in the last election?
- Many people were not able to vote last election.
Were you able to vote? - e.g. 2 Theft
- Did you ever steal as a child?
- Most people have stolen something when they were
children. Did you ever steal as a child?
9Question OrderingContext effects
- Question responses can be affected by the context
in which the question appears - Question order-effects usually involve a group of
questions dealing with the same issue - Replication problem
- Difficult to compare results of different surveys
over time since it is seldom possible to
replicate an entire questionnaire. - This is seldom taken into consideration in trend
studies, however. - No real solution other than carrying out
experiments within the questionnaire to assess
the impact of context
10Closed-ended questionsPros cons
- Advantages
- Quick easy for respondents
- Less articulate are not at a disadvantage
- Response choices can clarify alternatives
- Fewer irrelevant answers
- Easy to code and analyse
- Disadvantages
- Responses suggest ideas (e.g., No
opinion/knowledge still give opinion) - Frustrates respondents if categories are not
exhaustive - Misinterpretation goes unnoticed
- Complex issues forced into simple categories
- Recency effects
11Open-ended questionsPros cons
- Advantages
- Permits detail, clarification
- Unanticipated answers
- Reveals the logic behind a respondents response
- Disadvantages
- Generalization or comparison difficult
- Coding and statistical analysis difficult
- Irrelevant answers possible
- Bias towards educated
12Recency effectsExperimental evidence
13Dont know Responses Missing data or important
meaning?
- Missing data approach
- Standard question does not include DK category
- Interviewers probe in order to force an opinion
- Important meaning approach
- DKs may represent a lack of knowledge, in which
case they are acceptable responsesprobing
invents data - Converse suggests that much of survey errors
result from random responses by people have no
real opinion - Filter questions can be used to determine
interest and knowledge in a topic before asking
opinions - see Converse, P.E. (1970) Attitudes and
non-attitudes Continuation of a dialogue, The
Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems.
Reading, Mass. Addison-Wesley.
14DK Responses Experimental Evidence
15Measuring a middle positionShould it be built
into the question?
- e.g., Do you think that state funding for
universities should be increased or decreased? - Debate over whether the middle alternative should
be asked explicitly or simply accepted when
offered - Two rationales for omitting the middle category
are - Largely people who lean to one side but with
little intensity - It attracts those who have no opinion (would
rather choose it than dont know) - On the other hand, explicitly offering a middle
position makes good theoretical sense since those
who do opt for it may actually favour the middle
and thus should not be forced into another
category.
16Measuring the middle position Experimental
evidence
17Selective approach to midpoint and DK Rob Johns
- Never have a midpoint without a DK response
- Familiar items should have both, unfamiliar
should have neither - Minority is overestimated if indifference is
common but there is no midpoint, so keep both - Majority is overestimate if there is strong
social desirability pressures and a midpoint, so
omit both - Familiarity and social desirability can be
determined from pre-tests. - Okay to use different formats in the same
questionnaire
18Comparative Survey Research
- Difficult to know whether the same question means
the same thing in different countries - E.g. Chinese report being more politically
efficacious than the Mexicans - King et al (2004) use the following vignettes to
anchor the question - Alison lacks clean drinking water. She and her
neighbors are supporting an opposition candidate
in the forthcoming elections that has promised to
address the issue. It appears that so many people
in her area feel the same way that the opposition
candidate will defeat the incumbent
representative. - Imelda lacks clean drinking water. She and her
neighbors are drawing attention to the issue by
collecting signatures on a petition. They plan to
present the petition to each of the political
parties before the upcoming election. - Jane lacks clean drinking water because the
government is pursuing an industrial development
plan. In the campaign for an upcoming election,
an opposition party has promised to address the
issue, but she feels it would be futile to vote
for the opposition since the government is
certain to win. - Toshiro lacks clean drinking water. There is a
group of local leaders who could do something
about the problem, but they have said that
industrial development is the most important
policy right now instead of clean water. - Moses lacks clean drinking water. He would like
to change this, but he cant vote, and feels that
no one in the government cares about this issue.
So he suffers in silence, hoping something will
be done in the future.
19Constructing a good questionnaireGeneral advice
- Use social conversation as a guide to both
question construction and questionnaire design - Questions should be straight to the point
- One thing per question
- Avoid jargon, slang, abbreviations
- Avoid asking about vague future intentions or
hypothetical questions - Avoid wording that is influential or offensive
- If little is known use open questions otherwise
closed-ended questions with exhaustive and
mutually exclusive response categories are
typically better - Borrow questions from existing literature
- Pre-test
20Next week
- Please do the readings for your group and for the
lecture material BEFORE coming to class