Title: AntiHBc Testing
1Anti-HBc Testing
- National Liaison Committee
- July 8, 2002
2Objectives
- to educate the NLC on the biology of Hepatitis B
(HBV) - to present options for an additional test for
screening donors for HBV (anti-HBc testing) - to discuss the factors to consider for each option
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6Hepatitis B Detection in Donated Blood
- current test is for the detection of the virus,
i.e. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) - anti-HBc tests for the antibody to the Hepatitis
B core antigen
7Anti-HBc Testing
- not for the detection of early infections, i.e.
does not shorten the window period - detects chronic carriers whose HBsAg level is too
low to be detected with current tests
8Frequency of Transfusion Transmitted HBV (TT-HBV)
Potentially Eliminated by Anti-HBc Testing
- British study 1999 1/50,000 units
- USA study 2001 1/50,000 units
- confidence intervals for both studies
- 1/12,800 - 1/333,333 units
- both used HBsAg tests that are less sensitive
than tests used in Canada
9Anti-HBc Testing vs NAT to Prevent TT-HBV
- unlikely to be decreased with minipool NAT
- may be slightly decreased with single unit NAT
10Approximate Residual Risks for Transfusion
Transmitted HIV and HCV
- HIV - 1/2,500,000
- HCV - 1/500,000
11Severity of HBV Infection
- immunocompentent adults
- lt 5 develop chronic infection (with the
potential for liver failure, carcinoma) - chronicity much higher if infected in neonatal
period (up to 90) - fulminant infection occurs but is rare
- unknown for immunosuppressed persons but likely
poorer outcomes - immunization programs targeting children and
adolescents are increasing
12Estimated Potential Benefits of anti-HBc Testing
at CBS per year (800,000 units)
13Testing Options for Anti-HBc
- A number of testing options are possible - each
has its advantages disadvantages.
14Factors to Consider for Each Option
- decrease in HBV transmission
- donor loss
- potential effects on manufactured plasma
derivatives (issue resolved) - logistics
- cost
15Options for anti-HBc Testing
- test first donations relapsed donors, defer if
anti-HBc positive (one time) - rationale - most chronic infections occur in
persons infected at a young age so would increase
ratio true vs false positives - test all donations, defer if anti-HBc positive
(all)
16Options for Anti-HBc Testing
- test all donations, defer only on second anti-HBc
positive donation (repeat) - would decrease number of donors deferred for
false positive results - test all donations, defer only if anti-HBc
positive and anti-HBs negative (re-entry) - would decrease the deferral of non-infectious,
naturally immunized donors
17Safety - Decrease in HBV Transmission
- all/repeat - maximum impact
- one time - less than all/repeat
- re-entry - same (or slightly less??) than
all/repeat
18Causes of Donor Loss
- infectious units
- true positive, naturally immunized,
non-infectious donors (anti-HBs positive) - false positives
19Rate of anti-HBc Positivity in American Red
Cross Donors
- first time donors - 1.3
- repeat donors - 0.2
- weighted first time/repeat donors (22/78) -
0.43
20Donations and Donor Loss - Years 1 and 2 (n
740,000)
21Costs Associated withDonor Loss
- costs of recruiting new donors
- irritation/bewilderment of non-infectious
anti-HBc positive donors, particularly repeat
donors
22Laboratory Costs
- testing personnel and reagents in 11 labs
- assuming repeat reactive rate of 1.4
- does not include SOP development and
implementation - does not include IT support
- does not include replacement of lost donors
23Laboratory Costs
- one time testing
- year 1 - 1,360,000
- subsequent years - 650,000
- testing all donations
- 2,100,000 per year
24Cost of anti-HBc Testing on PRISM
- approximately 2.03 per test
25Anti-HBc -- Risk Management Analysis
- a risk management strategy should be implemented
to reduce the risk of HBV transmission - however, ideally, this risk should be assessed
and prioritized relative to other risks that CBS
faces - re-entry algorithm preferable (good balance
between optimizing safety and minimizing
unnecessary donor loss) - prepare now to implement re-entry option in order
to be able to start as soon as the conversion to
MAK occurs
26Anti-HBc Testing in Other Countries
- USA -- repeat testing, since early 1980s
- Japan -- do test, use re-entry algorithms
- UK - do not test, under discussion
- rest of Europe -- variable
- France, Germany -- all
- Sweden -- one time
27Hema-Quebecs Position
- Board of Directors mandated H-Q to pursue
anti-HBc testing - met with Health Canada (HC) in September 2001, to
explore anti-HBc testing using a re-entry
algorithm - HC opposed to this strategy - met with HC in March 2002, to explore anti-HBc
testing using a repeat strategy - HC open to
this strategy
28Expert Advisory Committee -- Blood Regulations
(EAC-BR)
- 2000-2001 - diverse opinions
- November 23, 2001 - A panel will be struck to
review all scientific data and risk-benefit
analysis - February 13, 2002 -
29Summary
- small but real risk of TT-HBV that can be further
decreased with currently available, fairly
affordable technology - donor loss at a level that could be replaced
- if CBS does not proceed we will be alone in North
America
30EMT Proposal
- EMT has endorsed a policy to proceed with
anti-HBc testing - exactly how and when to implement yet to be
determined although likely plan will be to
implement simultaneously with MAK - this position is supported by the Safety, Science
Ethics Committee of the Board
31EMT Proposal (Contd)
- strategies to collect data that could eventually
lead to Health Canada approval for re-entry of
non-infectious donors should be developed
32Testing for Anti-HBc Next Steps
- presentation discussion at NLC (July,
September) - review of NLC input by SSEC
- presentation of motion by SSEC to the Board
- development of a comprehensive business case
33Testing for anti-HBc -- Additional Reading
- Kleinman SH, Busch MP. HBV amplified and back
in the blood safety spotlight. Transfusion
2001411081-1085. - Kleinman SH. An analysis of possible blood donor
anti-HBc screening scenarios. Submitted to CBS,
September 4, 2001. - Petraszko T. Testing for Antibody to Hepatitis B
Core Antigen. CBS Position Paper, February 2001.