Determinants of Post Secondary Aspirations of Secondary School Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Determinants of Post Secondary Aspirations of Secondary School Students

Description:

Non-English speaking- stronger support from parents. Greater proportions of females than males ... English not spoken at home 11.8% Catholic School 9.1 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Mar5452
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Determinants of Post Secondary Aspirations of Secondary School Students


1
Determinants of Post Secondary Aspirations of
Secondary School Students
  • Mark Bowden (with James Doughney)
  • Economics and Finance

2
The Motivation
  • Widening participation in university.
  • Low socio-economic - ethnic backgrounds?
  • The students decision.
  • Rational? or cultural bias.

3
The Objective
  • Using binary logit model-
  • Identify the key variables
  • Estimate the marginal effects.
  • Boudon or Bourdieu?

4
Summary
  • Economic (Boudon) and Cultural (Bourdieu).
  • SES more important for students with ethnic
    background.
  • Access to internet appears important.

5
Theory
  • Structure Social systems constrain individual
    behaviour.
  • Bourdieu (1973) unconscious decisions- cultural
    capital
  • Boudon (1973) conscious decisions- dependent on
    socio-economic background.

6
Theory (cont)
  • Non-English speaking- stronger support from
    parents
  • Greater proportions of females than males

7
Determinants
From Standardised Residuals Mean -0.00053 Std
Deviation 1.003
Goodness of Fit H-L Statistic p 0.3973
Andrews Statistic p 0.5408
8
Marginal Effects
  • Parent completed university 2.9
  • English not spoken at home 11.8
  • Catholic School 9.1
  • Independent School 8.9
  • Views of Teachers 7
  • Views of Parents 10

9
Marginal Effects
  • Internet at home 14.9
  • Female 9.8
  • Lose touch with friends -3.6
  • Only for the wealthy -3.7

10
Revised Model
Goodness of Fit H-L Statistic p 0.4173
Andrews Statistic p 0.61.30
From Standardised Residuals Mean -0.0028 Std
Deviation 1.009
11
Marginal Effects
  • Not English high SES 13.6
  • Not English low SES 7.7
  • English at home high SES 1.4

12
Model Specification
  • Without the socio-economic status variable
    Goodness of Fit tests rejected at 10.
  • Omitted Variable School results other variables?

13
Acknowledgements
  • Denise Bett, manager of the former Equity and
    Social Justice Branch, Victoria University and
    leader of the Aspirations Online Project Team
  • Kate ORourke, Kathryn ORourke, Katia Honour,
    and Peter OCallaghan, Aspirations Project
    Officers

14
References
  • Boudon, R. (1974) Education, opportunities, and
    social inequality changing prospects in Western
    society, New York, Wiley.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1973) Cultural Reproduction and
    Social Reproduction. In Brown, R. (Ed.)
    Knowledge, education, and cultural change
    papers in the sociology of education. London,
    Tavistock Publications Limited.
  • Foskett, N. Hemsley-Brown, J. (2001) Choosing
    Futures Young people's decision-making in
    education, training and careers markets, London,
    Routledge Falmer.

15
References
  • Marks, G. N., Cresswell, J. Ainley, J. (2006)
    Explaining Socioeconomic Inequalities in Student
    Achievement The role of home and school factors.
    Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 105 -
    128.
  • Nash, R. (1990) Bourdieu on Education and Social
    and Cultural Reproduction. British Journal of
    Sociology of Education, 11, 431-447.
  • Nash, R. (2005) Cognitive habitus and collective
    intelligence concepts for the explanation of
    inequality of educational opportunity. Journal of
    Education Policy, 20, 3-21.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com