Standard of living measures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Standard of living measures

Description:

The diversity of potential SoL measures: monetary & non-monetary. For example: ... SoL measures are used both as outcomes and predictors. 3. 3. SoL measures: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:692
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: lau19
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Standard of living measures


1
Standard of living measures
  • Stephen P. Jenkins
  • Institute for Social and Economic Research
  • Email stephenj_at_essex.ac.uk

2
The diversity of potential SoL measuresmonetary
non-monetary
  • For example
  • money income (aggregated over a number of income
    sources)
  • consumption expenditures (aggregated over a
    number of headings), and other indicators
  • financial wealth and other assets
  • multiple non-monetary indicators of deprivation
    or hardship, and associated summary indices
  • subjective measures of financial well-being,
    satisfaction, and happiness
  • SoL measures are used both as outcomes and
    predictors

3
SoL measures current practice
  • Household income most commonly used measure,
    including in official monitoring of poverty and
    living standards in UK, Europe and elsewhere
  • e.g. BHPS, ECHP, EU-SILC, PSID, SIPP, GSOEP, etc.
  • Consumption expenditure emphasised by economists
  • few detailed comprehensive measures in
    longitudinal surveys (focus of selected items,
    e.g. housing, food, durables)
  • Wealth data
  • detailed regular for e.g. housing fewer
    detailed and comprehensive, or regularly
    collected, measures
  • Material deprivation indicators now
    supplementing UK and EU official monitoring
  • e.g. BHPS, ECHP
  • Subjective measures growing interest
  • e.g. BHPS, GSOEP
  • No survey currently contains all measures

4
Top-level issues
  • What are the most important research questions to
    be addressed using SoL measures, now and
    potentially in the future?
  • Which of the measures cited (or others) should
    receive priority?
  • How important is continuity of measurement
    relative to the existing BHPS, and comparability
    with other UK national surveys?
  • To what extent is cross-national comparability an
    important consideration?

5
Some common definitional issues
  • Optimal data collection frequency?
  • e.g. sub-annual, annual, less frequent
  • Reference period?
  • e.g. current versus annual for income/expenditure
  • How comprehensive a measure is really required?
  • e.g. specific aspects of total income/expenditure/
    wealth versus aggregate itself
  • e.g. domain satisfactions versus overall
    happiness
  • e.g. which indicators of deprivation
  • Which unit(s) necessary for?
  • each adult? each individual? key persons?
    household?

6
Various data collection issues
  • Relative pay-offs to different methods of data
    collection?
  • e.g. face-to-face interviews versus telephone or
    web
  • e.g. interviewer-derived versus self-completion
  • e.g. non-traditional tools of data collection
  • e.g. use of proxy respondents
  • Relative pay-offs to different levels of detail
  • e.g. exact amounts, grouped, unfolding bracket
  • e.g. number of categories in a deprivation
    indicator or happiness measure
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com