Title: Stewards Consultation
1Stewards Consultation
2Welcome
3Morning Agenda
4Todays Instructions
- New participants in all stakeholder groups
- Webcast available in archives 180 days
- 2nd audience listening on-line
- well note the number as we change slides
- email questions/comments ? from your regular
email program ? to the address below
info_at_stewardshipontario.ca
5Consultation Process Timing
6Blue Box Program PlanUpdate Amendments
7BBPP Update 2005 Program Year
- First full calendar year for program
- Met all legal requirements under WDA
- On track for
- 51.3M direct payments to municipalities
- approved 5.1M in competitive grants to improve
effectiveness efficiency of municipal programs - direct administration costs less than 5 of
program cost
8BBPP Update 2005 Program Year
- Successfully negotiated cost containment plan
with AMO - 2.5M investment in new glass market development
approved - Received processed 2,000 reports from stewards
- 500 potential additional stewards identified but
not yet reported
9BBPP Update 2005 Program Year
- First charges have been laid under Act
- failure to report
- failure to pay fees
- both company officers charged
- Completed first on-site audits of steward reports
10BBPP Update 2005 Program Year
- Original BBPP projected 815,000 tonnes recycled
municipal payments of 54M by 2004 - End 2004 results 824,000 tonnes recycled
municipal payments of 55.5M
11Amendments to BBPP for 2006
- Ministers decision on in-kind payments for
CNA/OCNA members with regards to their
obligations to municipalities - Cost containment strategy including agreements
with AMO on reasonable cost bands municipal
administration costs
12Amendments to BBPP for 2006
- Ministers requirement that Stewardship Ontario
WDO administration costs be capped - no more than 5 of total program costs
- Ministers direction on voluntary stewards
13Amendments to BBPP for 2006
- Revised Stewardship Ontario governance model
(when approved by Minister) - Changes to program rules
- 2006 fee rates
14Proposed 2006 Program Rules
15Background
- Rules changed annually
- update fee rates dates
- improve clarity
- address shortcomings
- Board is considering three changes to Rules for
which they would like stewards to provide comment
16Todays Rules Presentation
- Copy of proposed 2006 Rules provided
- Changes to Rules denoted in 1 of 3 ways
- Underline annual change
- Bold Italics new additions for your information
only - Boxed 3 boxed sections changes for comment
17Brand Owner Definition What has been our
experience?
1
- Many business models in place
- some not clearly covered by Rules
- Licensing arrangements wide-spread
- resulting in 2 possible brand owners in Ontario
- Need to assign obligation
- must be logical, clear, fair meet intent of
program - Companies who have organized corporate structure
for other purposes - exempt from fees related to
Designated Blue Box Waste (DBBW)
18Proposed Changes Brand Owner
1
- Recognize that trademark owner licensee may
both reside in Ontario - Clarifies Private Label manufacturers not
classified as licensee
19Proposed Changes Brand Owner
1
- In event of 2 brand owners in Ontario, obligation
assigned to party more directly connected to
production of DBBW, except Franchisor who shall
be the steward. - Reinforce that Franchisor is Brand Owner of DBBW
- Add any person whose corporate name or business
name registration includes trademark.
20Impact of Proposed Change
1
- Close gaps in current Rules
- currently exploited by small number of companies
- Clarifies obligation in case of trademark owner
licensee - Captures companies registered in Ontario who
benefit from sale of products, but do not meet
current test of residency
21Designation of Steward What has been our
experience?
2
- Confusion around who is obligated for service
packaging, specifically unbranded packaging - Previous franchisee supply rule confusing to
understand difficult to monitor - created un-level playing field within certain
sectors - Most franchisees under sales or 15 tonne
threshold - Franchisor owns trademark benefits from sale of
products with trademark
22Proposed Changes Designation of Stewards
2
- Add Service Packaging to defined terms
- Include Service Packaging to Brand Owner, First
Importer Franchisor designation - Add new section (iv) to capture Any person who
delivers Service Packaging to consumers in
Ontario - to cover mail order/internet shopping
23Proposed Changes Designation of Stewards
2
- In a franchise system, Franchisor owns brand
trademark - consistent with Ministers direction rules for
other stewards - Franchisor will be responsible for all DBBW
within their franchise system
24Impact of Proposed Change
2
- Improves clarity around Service Packaging
- including mail order/internet shopping companies
- Levels playing field for franchise operations
- obligations consistent across similar competitors
- Increases number of franchisors obligated to
report pay fees - Reduces quantity of exempted DBBW
25Steward Exemptions What has been our
experience?
3
- Two tonnage thresholds confusing raises
questions about fairness of program - Some stewards attempt to report business
operations separately to avoid obligations
26Proposed Changes Steward Exemptions
3
- Remove 75,000 kilogram (kg) threshold exemption
for newspapers - Resulting in only one 15,000 kg weight exemption
for all DBBW - Clarify weight exemption test in (ii) to include
the steward and its Affiliates as currently
applies in (i) sales exemption
27Impact of Proposed Change
3
- One consistent clear weight exemption
- Clearly defined 15,000 kg applies to steward
Affiliates - net impact will reduce number of exempted
stewards - Handful of exempt OCNA stewards will be obligated
- however financial impact would be lt150/yr
28Other Important Change
- Reporting payment schedule added as Schedule C
- Stewardship Ontario moving to quarterly payment
schedule as originally planned - Reporting deadline remains March 31st
- First payment of 25 in 2006 obligation due March
31st - penalty interest if payment received after
- March 31st
- last quarter payment due December 1, 2006
29Questions Answersinfo_at_stewardshipontario.ca
302006 Stewards Fees
31Topics to Cover
- Basis for calculating 2006 fees
- Proposed 2006 Stewards Fees
- Next steps
32Blue Box Stewards Fees
- Total industry cost down
- 61.2M for 2006 vs. 64.3M for 2005 (5)
- 74.3/tonne for 2006 vs. 82.5/tonne for 2005
(10)
33Cost Containment
- Negotiated cost containment strategy with
municipalities - apply reasonable cost bands based on better
performing programs - instituted performance measure as basis for
payments - reduction in Blue Box System cost of 24M over
next two years - cap municipal administration cost
- payment to best practice costs in 2008
34Agreed Net Blue Box Cost
140
120
100
80
Net Cost (actual gross cost less 3-year average
revenue)
Net cost (million )
60
Agreed Net Cost
40
20
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
Municipal Reporting Year
35Key Elements of Fees
Program Delivery, MOE Enforcement WDO Charges 5
Payments to Municipalities 91
Administration Start-up 3
Anticipated Shortfall 1
Due to difference in reported sales quantities
generation estimates used to calculate previous
years fees
36Key Elements of Fees Generation Rates
- Generation estimates largely based on waste
composition audits some industry data - Used last year generation rates
- accounting for population growth (1.26)
- extensive waste audit program underway, but
incomplete - As for 2005, used most recent stewards data for
newsprint, telephone directories, paint cans
LCBO glass packaging - these represent more reliable generation figures
than waste audit results
37Recovery Rates
Overall recovery up 6 from 779,843 tonnes to
823,627 tonnes
75
60
45
Recovery Rate ()
30
15
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
0
Printed Paper
Paper-based
Plastics
Aluminum
Steel
Glass
Packaging
Taken from 2004 annual municipal datacall
reported by WDO
38Gross Costs
- Reported by WDO from 2004 municipal datacall
- up 6.5 from 182.4M to 194.4M
- includes interest on municipal capital (4.2M)
- deferred to 2006 negotiated as part of cost
containment strategy - Use material specific costs from last years
allocation study - conditions not changed substantially across
province - preliminary work underway to address
implementation of single-stream recycling
combined recycling organics collection in
Toronto
39Revenue
- Reported by municipalities to WDO
- 83.7M in 2004 from 65.6M in 2003
- 3-year average (used for obligation)
- 73.6M for 2006 fees from 64.9M
- Relative prices will affect relative net costs
allocation among materials
40Industry Share of Blue Box Cost
140
Total 120.92 M
Total 117.55 M
120
100
Industry
Industry
55.46M
58.78M
Program Cost (millions of )
80
Cost Band 10M
60
40
Municipal
Municipal
58.78M
55.46M
20
0
2003
2004
41On Track with Program Plan
- Compared to original Blue Box Program Plan . . .
- for 2004
- plan forecast 814,700 tonnes to be recovered with
an industry obligation of 54M - actual recovery was higher at 823,600 tonnes with
an industry obligation of 55.5M
42Allocation Factors
- No change to the funding formula for 2006
- same allocation factors weighting
- recovery rate 40
- net cost 40
- equalization 20
43Program Delivery Costs for Market Development
- 2003/2004 fees ? 2.5M for glass
- 2005 fees ? 100K for plastics
- preliminary market development underway
- For 2006
- no additional market development fees
- glass plastics work ongoing progress
continues toward 60 diversion goal - this will be reviewed on an annual basis
44Program Delivery, Admin Start-up
Total 5.2M
WDO Charges MOE Enforcement 1.20M
Direct Program Delivery 1.93M
Administration 1.17M
Start-up 0.89M
45Stewards Reports vs. Fee Estimates
Packaging Printed Paper Generation For 2004
Fees
Difference between tonnes reported by stewards
estimates used for previous years fees
100
Estimated Generation for 2004 Fees
1,578,500 tonnes
80
Stewards Reports
60
1,285,000 tonnes
40
20
46Revenue Against Target
- For 2003/2004
- Previously estimated 1.1M
- Board decision to spread over 3 years ? pay 369K
each year - Actual 1.6M (as of Dec. 31 2004)
- higher re-filing, lower new stewards
- For 2005
- Additional 2003/2004 fees interest of 635K in
2005 - Projected net shortfall at Dec. 31 2005 of 1.15M
- Recovery in 2006 Fees
- 50 (575K) in 2006 fees
47Proposed Fee Rates Printed Paper
Proposed
2005 Fees
Material
2006 Fees
Change
(/kg)
(/kg)
CNA/OCNA Newsprint
0.076
0.182
Non-CNA/OCNA Newsprint
0.786
0.757
Magazines Catalogue
0.862
1.522
Telephone Directories
1.302
1.213
Other Printed Paper
9.029
7.668
48Proposed Fee Rates Packaging
Proposed
2005 Fees
Material
2006 Fees
Change
(/kg)
(/kg)
Paper Packaging
7.904
7.673
Plastics
13.907
13.556
Steel
4.745
4.601
Aluminum Food
-1.093
-0.476
Beverage Cans
Foil Other Aluminum
5.502
3.577
Glass
4.003
3.41
49Looking Forward to 2007
- Cost Pressures
- further increases in recovery
- cost of living program changes
- capital investment
- increase in municipal administration allowance
to 3 5 - commodity prices revenue
- Negotiated cost band for 2007 ? 14M reduction
- Ongoing cost containment work implementation of
EE Fund
50Consultation on Further Amendments to BBPP
51Consultation on Further Amendments to BBPP
- Fee setting methodology options include
- revise current allocation factor weightings
- modify the allocation factors
- alternative fee setting approaches
- Aggregation/dis-aggregation of material types
- aggregation of paper grades
- dis-aggregation of packaging grades
52Consultation on Further Amendments to BBPP
- Base year data to be used for 2007 fee setting
purposes - use previous year steward reports for Blue Box
generation estimates - harmonization with other provinces (e.g.
reporting years)
53Consultation on Further Amendments to BBPP
- Harmonize de minimis levels for all stewards
54Process Timing
552007 Fees Jan. to Sept.
56Questions Answersinfo_at_stewardshipontario.ca
57LunchWebcast Resumes at 130